Measurement and Prediction of Outcomes of Amplification
NCT ID: NCT00013416
Last Updated: 2009-01-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
1999-10-31
2002-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Quantifying Auditory Perceptual Learning Following Hearing Aid Fitting
NCT00013455
Functioning, Disability, and Quality of Life in the Adult Hearing Impaired
NCT00037986
Predicting Success With Hearing Aids
NCT00371449
Pitch and Loudness Perception by Cochlear Implant Listeners: Psychophysics and Objective Measures
NCT01284790
Evaluation of Open-canal Behind-the-Ear Hearing Aids and Traditional In-the-ear Hearing Aids.
NCT00727909
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
HYPOTHESES:
1. Inter-subject differences in personality traits, coping style, and/or expectations account for a significant and substantial amount of the variance in hearing aid fitting outcomes, independent of hearing impairment and fitting strategy.
2. Prediction of hearing aid fitting outcomes will be substantially improved if the prediction model includes extra-audiological data as well as data on impairment and hearing aid.
3. The post-fitting time course of hearing aid fitting outcome data is different for different outcome variables.
4. Self-report hearing aid fitting outcomes are stable after 3 months of hearing aid use.
5. Fitting outcomes are optimized for individuals with unpredictable loudness perception when clinically measured loudness data are used in the hearing aid fitting protocol.
PROCEDURES: Investigations will explore:(1)the determinants and characteristics of subjective outcome variables, and (2) the value of individual loudness data in hearing aid fitting. Subjects will be elderly men and women with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. The work will be performed at the Memphis VAMC Hearing Aid Research Laboratory.
Determinants and characteristics of subjective outcome variables. When self-reports are used to evaluate hearing aid fitting outcome, it is assumed that the data primarily reflect the efficacy of the hearing aid and the fitting strategy. There is a lack of information about the extent to which other variables might impact self-report data. We will explore this topic with 120 potential hearing aid wearers, followed from their initial expression of interest in amplification through the entire fitting process and for six months after the fitting. Data describing a range of pre-fitting variables as well as hearing impairment, and hearing aid fitting will be collected in a consortium of six clinical sites (including 5 VA sites) coordinated from the Memphis laboratory. The Memphis research team will complete data collection with each subject by collecting outcome data at three post-fitting intervals.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Hearing
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
US Department of Veterans Affairs
FED
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John Fryer, Ph.D., Asst. Director
Role:
Department of Veterans Affairs, Program Analysis and Review Section (PARS), rehabilitation Research & Development Service
Nancy Rocheleau, Program Analyst
Role:
Department of Veterans Affairs, Program Analysis and Rreview Section (PARS), Rehabilitation Research & Development Service
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
VAMC, Memphis
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
C2002R
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.