Evaluation of Unilateral vs Bilateral Hearing Aids for the Treatment of Age-related Hearing Loss

NCT ID: NCT04739436

Last Updated: 2025-04-10

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

278 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-04-26

Study Completion Date

2024-09-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to evaluate the benefit of bilateral hearing aid use compared to a unilateral hearing aid. Patients with mild to moderate bilateral hearing loss who are considering the purchase of a commercially available hearing aid will be considered for participation. Eligible participants will be randomized to one of the following treatment arms: (1) a bilateral hearing aid fitting group, and (2) a unilateral hearing aid fitting group.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Primary objectives:

1. To compare the hearing-aid benefit of unilateral versus bilateral fittings of commercially-available hearing aids that incorporate a dome coupling (open or closed dome as required by degree of hearing loss, or custom coupling if clinically indicated), which represents the most popular style used for mild to moderate hearing loss.
2. To compare other multi-dimensional outcomes including hearing-related quality of life, hearing aid satisfaction in patient-nominated goals, ecological hearing aid outcomes, and hearing aid use.

Secondary objectives:

1. To compare performance outcomes for unilateral versus bilateral hearing aid fittings
2. To explore the differences in long-term patient reported outcomes for their final hearing aid configuration choice
3. To explore patient experiences in each group (unilateral vs bilateral), and patient preference in regards to their choice of final hearing aid configuration.

This study is being conducted at Duke and Vanderbilt Medical Centers, with Duke functioning as the main coordinating center. Study participants will pay out of pocket for the hearing aid(s), but will be able to extend the hearing aid fitting trial period from 60 days (standard of care) to 180 days (6 months). Participants will be given the opportunity to change their hearing aid configuration and/or return their hearing aid(s) for a refund after 3 months, and again at the end of the 6 month study period.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hearing Loss

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bilateral hearing aid fitting group

Group Type OTHER

Hearing amplification

Intervention Type DEVICE

Bilateral vs. unilateral hearing aids for hearing loss

Unilateral hearing aid fitting group

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hearing amplification

Intervention Type DEVICE

Bilateral vs. unilateral hearing aids for hearing loss

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hearing amplification

Bilateral vs. unilateral hearing aids for hearing loss

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 50+ years of age
* Ability to read and understand English
* Mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss (defined by a pure-tone average at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz of \<55 dB HL in each ear, and the 3000 Hz and 4000 Hz threshold \<80 in each ear), based on a hearing test obtained within the last 6 months by a licensed audiologist.
* Symmetrical hearing loss defined by \<20 dB difference between the pure-tone average of 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz between ears)
* Interested in purchasing hearing aids, but is open minded about trying one or two hearing aids
* No prior hearing aid use longer than 3 months (as documented via self-report)
* Adequate literacy to complete questionnaires
* Willing to purchase study-specific hearing aid(s)
* Access to a smart phone and the internet

Exclusion Criteria

* Concerns for middle ear pathology (e.g., air bone gap of \>15 dB at 2 consecutive octave frequencies in either ear)
* Concerns for retrocochlear pathology by audiologist (e.g unilateral tinnitus or ear fullness, referral to ENT/Auditory Brainstem Response testing to r/o acoustic neuroma)
* Severe tinnitus as the reason for seeking amplification
* Co-morbid condition that would interfere with study (e.g., dementia, blindness, neurologic pathology)
* History of fluctuating hearing loss
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Duke University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sherri Smith, AuD,PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Duke Health

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PCORI-HL-2019C1-16059

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Pro00106077

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Evaluation of Hearing Aid Benefit
NCT05198713 COMPLETED NA
Meniere Disease and Hearing Aids
NCT05582148 UNKNOWN NA