Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
78 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-12-20
2025-06-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ambulatory Telemonitoring of People With Hearing Loss and Having a Cochlear Implant COCHLESURV
NCT02890576
Feasibility of Remote Cochlear Implant Users' Follow-up
NCT03022227
Predictive Study on Hearing Rehabilitation After Cochlear Implant
NCT06086041
Characterisation of Low Frequency Hearing and Vestibular Function in Patients Undergoing Cochlear Implantation
NCT06021132
Speech Performance and Clinic Efficiency With Remote Care Compared With Standard of Care in Adults With a Cochlear Implant in the First 12 Months Post-activation
NCT05552118
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
According to the official recommendations of the French National Authority for Health, a patient implanted for a sufficiently long time should be seen annually at the implantation reference center. This periodicity might appear too low, in which case a patient will have to organise an unscheduled check-up appointment. Such appointments are a source of various problems: firstly, they disorganise the routine of the reference centers not adapted for emergency and semi-emergency situations; secondly, the patient might encounter substantial travelling fees (only 22 refence centers in France), especially if an implant component to replace is out of stock. Having an utility of remote patient monitoring is also beneficial in situations where the access to health care system is restricted, for example, the recent pandemic of Covid 19.
Cochlear™ has recently designed an at-home based patient testing tool, Remote Check application, permitting to complete a series of hearing test from a compatible smartphone. The results are then sent to the implantation reference center and evaluated by healthcare professionals. The data is securely stored on Cloud accessible to authorised clinicians via MyCochlear site.
Although the feasibility and the accuracy in detecting technical problems of remote follow-up of people with cochlear implant had been already assessed, its impact on health care system is still unknown. Hence, this project will be the first to evaluate an interest of implementing remote monitoring in following adults with cochlear implantation.
The main objective of the study is - to determine if the use of telemonitoring through Remote Check application reduces significantly a number of unscheduled check-up appointments in the reference centre during 1 year follow-up period for a patient with a cochlear implant Cochlear™ in comparison to traditional health care approach.
The secondary objectives are:
* To compare a number of scheduled appointments during a period of Remote Check use versus a historical period of a traditional follow-up
* To compare a number of indispensable unscheduled visits (unavoidable with or without Remote Check use) with a number of unnecessary ones (avoidable with Remote Check)
* To measure the compliance of the Remote Check application use
* To assess quantitatively and qualitatively a number of implant failures/dysfunctions identified with Remote Check
* To evaluate for each study participant time spent by clinician to treat Remote Check analysis data uploaded to My Cochlear data base
* To assess patients satisfaction of Remote Check implementation in their healthcare routine
* To evaluate the quality of life specific to the Deaf before and after Remote Check use The study implies four visits for each patient. The inclusion visit (V0) is a routine check-up appointment in the implantation reference center. After the patient is informed and his/her consent is collected, the Remote Check application will be activated on his/her processor. Two next follow-up visits, V1 (V0+ 5 mois (± 0.5 mois)) and V2 (V0 + 11 mois (± 0.5 mois)), are remote visits with hearing test performed through Remote Check application. Final visit, V3 (V0 + 12 mois (± 0.5 mois)), corresponds to patient's annual check-up appointment. In case a problem with processor's functioning is detected during V2, it will be resolved at V3. Equipment verification will be also performed to detect failures missed by Remote Check.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients followed at the implantation reference centers
Patients eligible for implant processor renewal in 2 years and corresponding to inclusion criteria will be enrolled during their routine check-up appointment at the implantation reference centers of the University Hospitals of Montpellier and Toulouse. Patients will be their own controls through the use of their medical history data.
Remote Check
Remote Check is a remote monitoring tool which permits patients with Cochlear Nucleus CP1000 or CP1150 processors to complete hearing tests (pure-tone and speech-in-voice audiometry, electrode impedance measures, implant functioning assessment) at home,
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Remote Check
Remote Check is a remote monitoring tool which permits patients with Cochlear Nucleus CP1000 or CP1150 processors to complete hearing tests (pure-tone and speech-in-voice audiometry, electrode impedance measures, implant functioning assessment) at home,
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subjects who have already renewed their processor at least once
* Subjects implanted for more than 5 years
* Over 20 years old
* Subjects with Apple or Android smartphones compatible with Remote Check
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients unable to give oral informed consent
* Patients residing in geographical zones with limited internet access
* Subjects deprived of liberty by juridical or administrative decision
* Patients subjected to legal protection measures (guardianship or curatorship)
* Subjects for whom French is not a native language
20 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Toulouse
OTHER
Groupement Interrégional de Recherche Clinique et d'Innovation
OTHER
Foundation maladies rares, France
UNKNOWN
Cochlear
INDUSTRY
University Hospital, Montpellier
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Montpellier
Montpellier, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Frédéric Venail
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RECHMPL21_0519
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.