Telephone vs. Voice Over IP Speech Comprehension in Hearing Aided Subjects.

NCT ID: NCT03005912

Last Updated: 2018-05-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-04-01

Study Completion Date

2018-05-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Despite modern hearing aids such as cochlear implants, speech comprehension during telephone conversation is challenging for hearing-impaired patients. On the one hand, conventional telephones transmit a limited spectrum of the acoustic signal compared to a normal conversation. On the other hand, lip reading during a phone call is generally not possible. As a result, speech comprehension during a telephone conversation is reduced. In previous studies, the authors demonstrated an improved speech comprehension for hearing-impaired patients using voice-over internet protocol (VoIP) telephony (Skype) compared to conventional telephony.

New bluetooth-enabled hearing aids allow for direct transmission of the telephone signal to the hearing device. As the direct transmission is expected to improve signal-to-noise ratio, speech comprehension is tested in patients with bluetooth-enabled hearing aids for 4 different scenarios: 1. conventional telephony without bluetooth device 2. conventional telephony with bluetooth device 3. VoIP telephony without bluetooth device 4. VoIP telephony with bluetooth device

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Speech comprehension of hearing impaired individuals is limited in telephone conversations due to the limited acoustic spectrum transmitted by conventional analogue telephones, such as background noise, interferences with the hearing aid and the absent possibility of lip-reading. This can provide an impact on quality of life as better speech comprehension reduces exclusion from social interactions as well as potential professional occupations. Furthermore, in elderly population an impaired hearing function is associated with a higher risk of dementia, mortality rate and dependency in the daily activities.

Mantokoudis et al. recently demonstrated that the larger acoustic spectrum of internet telephony (Voice over Internet Protocol \[VoIP\]) results in superior speech comprehension of individuals with hearing aids compared to conventional telephones. Low signal quality during internet telephony does not significantly attenuate speech understanding. Another study revealed that internet telephony combined with a webcam further improves speech comprehension as additional lip reading was possible.

New bluetooth audio streaming devices allow for pairing with smart phones or other devices supporting bluetooth technology such as computers for direct routing of the audio signal to the hearing aid. Current state of research shows significant benefits for hearing impaired individuals using this technology for telephone conversations. The speech comprehension and subjective satisfaction can be improved due to a better sound quality and accuracy and less noise interference.

However, speech comprehension of these new bluetooth devices has not been investigated in combination with internet telephony (VoIP) and it remains unclear whether hearing impaired individuals could benefit of this possibility. This study investigates, whether bluetooth audio streaming devices paired to hearing aids/implants combined with internet telephony improves speech comprehension in hearing impaired individuals.

VoIP and conventional telephone speech comprehension will be compared with and without a wireless bluetooth phone clip (Cochlear Wireless Phone Clip, Cochlear Ltd., 1 University Avenue, Macquarie University, New South Wales 2109, Australia). The phone clip is capable to directly connect to other bluetooth-enabled devices and transmits the audio signal directly to the sound processor of the hearing implant. A microphone in the phone clip enables to record and transmit the user's spoken words to the mobile phone therefore a hands-free use is possible.

Bluetooth connection is a well-established wireless technology transmitting at 2.4 gigahertz at distances up to approximately seven meters. The wireless technology is the same for most of bluetooth and Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) devices. According to the Swiss federal health office the electromagnetic radiation of the bluetooth device as intended to be used in the proposed study fulfils the requirements of the European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC).

Several previous studies demonstrated a significantly increased conventional telephone speech perception with the Cochlear Wireless Phone Clip than without this device. On the other hand, speech perception in hearing impaired people using internet telephony is improved compared to conventional telephony. However, speech perception using the phone clip in connection to internet telephony has not been studied to this date and remains unknown.

The purpose of the proposed study is to quantify VoIP vs. conventional telephone speech comprehension in individuals with or without application of bluetooth phone clip. Potentially better speech comprehension due to the application of the phone clip could alleviate the handicap of communication in individuals with hearing aids. As a consequence the social life and contacts of the affected individuals such as worsening of mental state and dependency in the everyday life could be ameliorated only by using a simple device.

The goal of this study is to measure speech comprehension of individuals with hearing aids using a bluetooth paired phone clip and VoIP telephony. To quantify a potential benefit of this, speech comprehension has to be tested with and without the phone clip for VoIP and conventional telephony in the same individuals. Speech comprehension will be quantified with a signal/noise ratio of the HSM- sentence test (Hochmair, Schulz, Moser)

Upon agreement to participate, patients are invited to the audiological department at Inselspital in Bern. After remaining questions are clarified, the patient has to sign a written informed consent. The investigation will take approximately two hours and takes place in the sound-proof hearing test chambers of the audiological department.

Four different speech comprehension scenarios are tested:

1. Conventional telephony without bluetooth device
2. Conventional telephony with bluetooth device
3. VoIP telephony without bluetooth device
4. VoIP telephony with bluetooth device

To evaluate speech comprehension, the HSM (Hochmair-Schulz-Moser) sentence test is used. This is a test mainly applied to evaluate the speech comprehension in patients with cochlear implants and consists of 30 lists each including 20 short sentences. After initial presentation of exercise sentences without background noise, additional noise is added while the speech signal is kept at a constant volume level. The percentage of speech comprehension is determined by the quantity of correctly understood sentences at a certain signal-to-noise ratio (S/N Ratio). In this study a S/N Ratio of 10dB, with a signal at 70dB and noise at 60dB, will be analysed.

For representativeness of speech comprehension results, participants will use their hearing aids with their daily use volume settings. The phone clip will be programmed for a 1:1 transmission of the telephone conversation and the ambient noise. At the end, the patient has to evaluate the subjective perception of the speech sound quality by means of the Mean Opinion Score (MOS).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hearing-Impairment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conventional acoustic telephony

Telephone speech comprehension in hearing aided patients (Cochlear Implant or GN Resound hearing aid) for a conventional mobile phone call with acoustic transmission of the speech signal.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Conventional acoustic telephony

Intervention Type DEVICE

Quantification of speech comprehension by means of the Hochmair-Schulz-Moser sentence test.

Conventional bluetooth telephony

Telephone speech comprehension in hearing aided patients (Cochlear Implant or GN Resound hearing aid) for a conventional mobile phone call with direct bluetooth transmission of the speech signal to the cochlear implant or hearing aid.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional bluetooth telephony

Intervention Type DEVICE

Quantification of speech comprehension by means of the Hochmair-Schulz-Moser sentence test.

VoIP acoustic telephony

Telephone speech comprehension in hearing aided patients (Cochlear Implant or GN Resound hearing aid) for a VoIP mobile phone call with acoustic transmission of the speech signal.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

VoIP acoustic telephony

Intervention Type DEVICE

Quantification of speech comprehension by means of the Hochmair-Schulz-Moser sentence test.

VoIP bluetooth telephony

Telephone speech comprehension in hearing aided patients (Cochlear Implant or GN Resound hearing aid) for a VoIP mobile phone call with direct bluetooth transmission of the speech signal to the cochlear implant or hearing aid.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

VoIP bluetooth telephony

Intervention Type DEVICE

Quantification of speech comprehension by means of the Hochmair-Schulz-Moser sentence test.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Conventional acoustic telephony

Quantification of speech comprehension by means of the Hochmair-Schulz-Moser sentence test.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional bluetooth telephony

Quantification of speech comprehension by means of the Hochmair-Schulz-Moser sentence test.

Intervention Type DEVICE

VoIP acoustic telephony

Quantification of speech comprehension by means of the Hochmair-Schulz-Moser sentence test.

Intervention Type DEVICE

VoIP bluetooth telephony

Quantification of speech comprehension by means of the Hochmair-Schulz-Moser sentence test.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Bluetooth enabled hearing aid (Nucleus 6 CI or a GN Resound hearing aid) compatible to the phone clip
* Use of hearing aid for ≥ 3 months.
* Native German speaker

Exclusion Criteria

* Mentally or physically unfit to participate
* Vulnerable Person
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cochlear

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Stiftung Besser Hören

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Markus Huth

Oberarzt

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Georgios Mantokoudis, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Attending physician

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tyler RS, Baker LJ, Armstrong-Bednall G. Difficulties experienced by hearing-aid candidates and hearing-aid users. Br J Audiol. 1983 Aug;17(3):191-201. doi: 10.3109/03005368309107884.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6357328 (View on PubMed)

Cray JW, Allen RL, Stuart A, Hudson S, Layman E, Givens GD. An investigation of telephone use among cochlear implant recipients. Am J Audiol. 2004 Dec;13(2):200-12. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2004/025).

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15903146 (View on PubMed)

Ito J, Nakatake M, Fujita S. Hearing ability by telephone of patients with cochlear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 Dec;121(6):802-4. doi: 10.1053/hn.1999.v121.a93864.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10580241 (View on PubMed)

Liu C, Fu QJ, Narayanan SS. Effect of bandwidth extension to telephone speech recognition in cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Feb;125(2):EL77-83. doi: 10.1121/1.3062145.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19206836 (View on PubMed)

Horng MJ, Chen HC, Hsu CJ, Fu QJ. Telephone speech perception by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implantees. Ear Hear. 2007 Apr;28(2 Suppl):66S-69S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31803153bd.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17496651 (View on PubMed)

Fu QJ, Galvin JJ 3rd. Recognition of simulated telephone speech by cochlear implant users. Am J Audiol. 2006 Dec;15(2):127-32. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2006/016).

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17182877 (View on PubMed)

Milchard AJ, Cullington HE. An investigation into the effect of limiting the frequency bandwidth of speech on speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users. Int J Audiol. 2004 Jun;43(6):356-62. doi: 10.1080/14992020400050045.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15457818 (View on PubMed)

Kepler LJ, Terry M, Sweetman RH. Telephone usage in the hearing-impaired population. Ear Hear. 1992 Oct;13(5):311-9. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199210000-00009.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1487091 (View on PubMed)

Rumeau C, Frere J, Montaut-Verient B, Lion A, Gauchard G, Parietti-Winkler C. Quality of life and audiologic performance through the ability to phone of cochlear implant users. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Dec;272(12):3685-92. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3448-x. Epub 2014 Dec 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25527411 (View on PubMed)

Cacciatore F, Napoli C, Abete P, Marciano E, Triassi M, Rengo F. Quality of life determinants and hearing function in an elderly population: Osservatorio Geriatrico Campano Study Group. Gerontology. 1999 Nov-Dec;45(6):323-8. doi: 10.1159/000022113.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10559650 (View on PubMed)

Dalton DS, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BE, Klein R, Wiley TL, Nondahl DM. The impact of hearing loss on quality of life in older adults. Gerontologist. 2003 Oct;43(5):661-8. doi: 10.1093/geront/43.5.661.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14570962 (View on PubMed)

Gates GA, Cobb JL, Linn RT, Rees T, Wolf PA, D'Agostino RB. Central auditory dysfunction, cognitive dysfunction, and dementia in older people. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996 Feb;122(2):161-7. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1996.01890140047010.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8630210 (View on PubMed)

Barnett S, Franks P. Deafness and mortality: analyses of linked data from the National Health Interview Survey and National Death Index. Public Health Rep. 1999 Jul-Aug;114(4):330-6. doi: 10.1093/phr/114.4.330.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10501133 (View on PubMed)

Mantokoudis G, Kompis M, Dubach P, Caversaccio M, Senn P. How internet telephony could improve communication for hearing-impaired individuals. Otol Neurotol. 2010 Sep;31(7):1014-21. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181ec1d46.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20634771 (View on PubMed)

Mantokoudis G, Dubach P, Pfiffner F, Kompis M, Caversaccio M, Senn P. Speech perception benefits of internet versus conventional telephony for hearing-impaired individuals. J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jul 16;14(4):e102. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1818.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22805169 (View on PubMed)

Mantokoudis G, Dahler C, Dubach P, Kompis M, Caversaccio MD, Senn P. Internet video telephony allows speech reading by deaf individuals and improves speech perception by cochlear implant users. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054770. Epub 2013 Jan 24.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23359119 (View on PubMed)

Wolfe J, Morais M, Schafer E. Improving Hearing Performance in Cochlear Nucleus 6 users with true wireless accessories. Cochlear Limited. 2015 May; D710887 ISS2

Reference Type RESULT

Robier M, Bakhos D, Pawelczyk T, Lescanne E. Evaluation of benefit provided by the Cochlear Wireless Phone Clip. Cochlear Limited.2015 Dec; D785163 ISS1

Reference Type RESULT

Martinez Basterra Z, Fernández de Pinedo M, Altuna Mariexcurrena X. Telephone speech recognition improvement in a noisy environment: use of a Bluetooth accessory. Cochlear Limited.2015 Dec; D785163 ISS1

Reference Type RESULT

Kim MB, Chung WH, Choi J, Hong SH, Cho YS, Park G, Lee S. Effect of a Bluetooth-implemented hearing aid on speech recognition performance: subjective and objective measurement. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2014 Jun;123(6):395-401. doi: 10.1177/0003489414526847.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24687593 (View on PubMed)

Marcrum SC. Wireless streaming with the Cochlear Wireless Phone Clip improves speech understanding and reduces listening effort during telephone use in noise. Cochlear Limited.2015 Dec; D785163 ISS1

Reference Type RESULT

Gündüz B, Gökdoğan C, Orçan E, Fikret Çetik M, Tuncer Ü, Özdemiroğlu S. Hearing inventory with the Cochlear Wireless Phone Clip in experienced adult cochlear implant recipients at work and during daily life. Cochlear Limited.2015 Dec; D785163 ISS1

Reference Type RESULT

Duke M, Wolfe J. Evaluation of speech recognition over the telephone with and without the Cochlear Wireless Phone Clip. Cochlear Limited.2015 Dec; D785163 ISS1

Reference Type RESULT

Çiprut A, Derinsu U, Cesur S, Çiçek B, Özkan B, Yücel E. Speech intelligibility with the Cochlear Wireless Phone Clip in experienced cochlear implant recipients. Cochlear Limited.2015 Dec; D785163 ISS1

Reference Type RESULT

Qian H, Loizou PC, Dorman MF. A phone-assistive device based on Bluetooth technology for cochlear implant users. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2003 Sep;11(3):282-7. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2003.816871.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 14518792 (View on PubMed)

Hochmair-Desoyer I, Schulz E, Moser L, Schmidt M. The HSM sentence test as a tool for evaluating the speech understanding in noise of cochlear implant users. Am J Otol. 1997 Nov;18(6 Suppl):S83.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 9391610 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016-01935

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Bluetooth-Study

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Evaluation of Hearing Aid Benefit
NCT05198713 COMPLETED NA