Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-10-31
2016-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
However, advances in telemedicine in this context, let consider the possibility of addressing these hearing aids fitting via the same computer interface, but remotely controlled by the hearing care professional. The purpose of this study is to assess the ability to perform these tests no longer in front of the patient settings, but away from it, and without visual and sound contact other than through a computer interface.
At the end, this project wants to show that a remote fitting is an acceptable procedure that provides comparable results to-face fitting in terms of speech perception, speech in noise audiometry, hearing loss related quality of life in order to be able to offer this type of strategy.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Telemonitoring in Cochlear Implant Patient Care
NCT05566353
Study of SelfFit Mobile Medical App for Hearing Loss Diagnostics and Hearing Device Fitting / Fine Tuning
NCT01877317
Effectiveness and Acceptability of Remote Fine-Tuning of Hearing Aids in Danish Adults
NCT06992778
Coupler-Based Hearing-Aid Fitting Approach for Experienced Users
NCT02772757
Cochlear Implant and Vestibular Function.
NCT02584361
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Currently, the fitting of hearing aids is using a computer interface that allows to adjust the gain and compression of acoustic amplification. This adjustment is made face to face, patient and audiologist being located in a soundproof space to test the effectiveness of the hearing aid.
However, advances in telemedicine in this context, let consider the possibility of addressing these hearing aids fitting via the same computer interface, but remotely controlled by the hearing care professional. The purpose of this study is to assess the ability to perform these tests no longer in front of the patient settings, but away from it, and without visual and sound contact other than through a computer interface.
2. Objectives Main objective: To show that the remote fitting of hearing aids using the platform developed by AudioProConnect provides speech perception scores similar to those obtained by a face-control, after 5 weeks of use among experienced hearing aid users.
Secondary Objectives: To compare the duration and the quality of both types of fitting, speech in noise testing, deafness related quality of life and assess the wearing time of hearing aids.
3. Methods DESIGN: Biomedical research on health product, prospective, multicenter, randomized, and crossover study to assess the remote fitting of hearing aids: Study REFIT-HEARING Study Population: adults with bilateral hearing aids. Inclusion criteria: Patient aged between 18 and 85 years old, with hearing loss and using two hearing aids for more than one year, and compatible with AudioProConnect platform.
Exclusion criteria: Patient with fluctuations of pure tone audiometry, cognitive disorders or severe speech disorders. Patient unable to move in an audiology laboratory.
Primary Outcome: Evaluation of speech perception score with PBK test free-field at 60 dB.
Secondary endpoints: assessment of quality control by measuring the pitch gain, duration of fitting in minutes, speech in noise audiometry, the wearing time of hearing aids in hours, the quality of life related to hearing loss via the APHAB questionnaire.
Number of patients: 60 subjects Procedure (number of visits, length of inclusions, duration of follow-up, study schedule patient visits content, brief description of intervention): After the investigator has verified the criteria of inclusion / non inclusion and the subject has signed the written informed consent, the subject will be followed for a period ranging from 2 months to 5 months, during which he attended four visits in a audiology laboratory referenced in this project. During these visits, a fitting of hearing aids face to face or remotely will be realized, and it will be asked to answer a questionnaire to assess quality of life between the two fitting techniques.
Study Schedule:
Inclusion period: 3 months (M3-M6) Duration of the study for one subject: 2 months to 5 months (M6 to M8 or M6 to M11) Duration statistical analysis / recovery: 3 months (M11-M14) Global Study duration: 14 months
4. Outlook At the end, this project wants to show that a remote fitting provides comparable results to-face fitting in terms of speech perception, in order to be able to offer this type of strategy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
face to face fitting
face to face fitting of hearing aids
Remote fitting
remote fitting of hearing aids
Face to face fitting
face to face fitting of hearing aids
remote fitting
remote fitting of hearing aids
Remote fitting
remote fitting of hearing aids
Face to face fitting
face to face fitting of hearing aids
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Remote fitting
remote fitting of hearing aids
Face to face fitting
face to face fitting of hearing aids
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* User of two hearing aids for more than a year
* Carriers of adjustable digital hearing aids by means of a software of the usable manufacturer on Windows® PC (in stand-alone or as plug-in in the software NOAH®) to be integrated into the platform AudioProConnect. It is the case of almost all the current hearing aids (Phonak, Starkey, Siemens, Unitron, etc.)
* Subject able to understand the nature, the aim and the methodology of the study.
* Affiliation or recipient with the mode of social security.
* Collection of the informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Cognitive disorders or severe phasic hampering the understanding of the language or the repetition of the speech (Subject not being capable of participating in a vocal audiometry during the last regulation of its hearing aids)
* Incapacitated to move in a laboratory of audioprosthesis
* Fickle bearing of the hearing aid (\<6h /day ou \< 5day/7)
* Tip not adapted little finger
* Presence of plugs of earwax at the time of the tests
* Patient minor(miner) or protected adults or in the incapacity to give its consent according to the article L1121-8 Of the Public Code of the Health (CSP)
* Pregnant or breast-feeding women according to the article L1121-5 du CSP.
* Vulnerable people according to the article L1121-6 du CSP.
18 Years
84 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
AudioPro Connect
INDUSTRY
Alliance Audition Montpellier
OTHER
Audition Conseil Perpignan
OTHER
Audition Conseil à Nîmes
OTHER
University Hospital, Montpellier
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Frédéric VENAIL, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Montpellier
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hôpital Gui de Chauliac - Service ORL
Montpellier, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Venail F, Picot MC, Marin G, Falinower S, Samson J, Cizeron G, Balcon M, Blanc D, Bricaud J, Lorenzi A, Ceccato JC, Puel JL. Speech perception, real-ear measurements and self-perceived hearing impairment after remote and face-to-face programming of hearing aids: A randomized single-blind agreement study. J Telemed Telecare. 2021 Aug;27(7):409-423. doi: 10.1177/1357633X19883543. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
9594
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.