Efficacy of a Coupler-based Fitting Approach for Experienced Users Receiving Replacement Hearing Aids

NCT ID: NCT03569228

Last Updated: 2025-05-25

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

163 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-10-28

Study Completion Date

2023-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hearing loss is among the top service-connected disabilities in Veterans. Hearing aids are the primary intervention for hearing loss. Half of the hearing aids dispensed in the VA are to Veterans who are receiving replacement amplification. Many Veterans would like their replacement hearing aids mailed to them, but they are required to travel to the clinic so that the fit of the hearing aid can be verified. There are standard fitting procedures, such as those used in infants and children, that use a coupler to simulate the patient's real ear to verify the hearing aid fitting. The results of this study should determine the efficacy of a coupler-based hearing-aid fitting protocol that would not require the Veteran to attend the fitting appointment, thereby contributing to improved Veteran-Centric care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In the VA system, hearing loss is the second-most common service-connected condition affecting 933,182 Veterans, exceeded only by tinnitus which affects 1,121,709 Veterans (data from Veterans Benefit Report for Fiscal Year 2016). In FY 2016, the VA dispensed 750,075 hearing aids at a net procurement of nearly $270 million (report generated from VA Denver Acquisition and Logistics Center \[DALC\] Remote Order Entry System \[ROES\]). Half of the hearing aids dispensed were to experienced hearing aid users receiving replacement hearing aids (Dennis, 2014). VA Audiology caseload is significant and Veterans can experience long wait-times for fitting appointments to obtain new hearing aids (Office of the Inspector General, 2014).

The purpose of the fitting appointment is to program and verify the hearing aids and orient the patient to hearing aid use/care. For patients obtaining replacement hearing aids, the orientation typically is unnecessary, and the programming is simplified; consisting mainly of matching the individual's real-ear aided response (REAR) and hearing aid output to appropriate target values. In contrast to adults, REAR measurements are not well-tolerated by children due to the requirement for placement of a probe tube in the ear canal. Therefore, a hearing aid fitting procedure that circumvents the need for in situ REAR measurements (real ear coupler difference or RECD) is the standard-of-care (SoC) for children. Considerable research clearly has shown the equivalency of in situ REAR and RECD fitting procedures (e.g., Moodie et al., 1994). RECD fitting procedures rarely are used with adults; however, such an approach could preclude the need for direct physical contact with the patient at the time of the hearing aid fitting. Three experiments are proposed. The purpose of the first study is to evaluate coupler-based fitting approach for groups of experienced users obtaining replacement hearing aids and compare the accuracy of those fittings to the prescription and their outcomes to norms. The second study aims to develop correction factors for venting of open-fit hearing aids. The third study will focus on comparing coupler-based fittings of open-fit hearing aids (using correction factors developed from study two results) to an SoC (active control) group who will have their open-fit hearing aids fitted in face-to-face appointment via standard in situ REAR procedures. In Study 1 and 3, both groups will return for in situ REARs and self-report outcomes assessment one month after the hearing-aid fitting. The results of this study should determine the efficacy of a RECD-based, hearing-aid fitting approach for experienced hearing-aid users who are receiving replacement hearing aids consisting of a variety of styles. If the approaches are equivalent, then this study will provide an evidence-based, RECD fitting approach that should result in greater patient satisfaction and reduced costs.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hearing Loss

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Study 1. Participants obtaining replacement in-the-ear (ITE) or behind-the ear (BTE) hearing aids will be assigned to the ITE or BTE coupler-based fitting groups.

Study 2: Participants will be fitted with open-fit hearing aids using simulated audiograms.

Study 3. Participants obtaining replacement open fit or receiver-in-the canal hearing aids will be randomly assigned to the standard of care fitting groups (open or closed) or the coupler-based fitting groups (open or closed).
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Study 1 (In-the-Ear) Group

Experienced users of in-the-ear (ITE) hearing aids will receive replacement ITE hearing aids that are fitted and verified in a test box coupler, then mailed to the patient for a 4-week field trial.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Study 1 - ITE hearing aids

Intervention Type DEVICE

Experienced users of in-the-ear (ITE) hearing aids will receive replacement ITE hearing aids that are fitted and verified in a test box coupler, then mailed to the patient for a 4-week field trial.

Study 1 (Behind-the-Ear) Group

Experienced users of behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aids will receive replacement BTE hearing aids that are fitted and verified in a test box coupler, then mailed to the patient for a 4-week field trial.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Study 1 - BTE hearing aids

Intervention Type DEVICE

Experienced users of behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aids will receive replacement BTE hearing aids that are fitted and verified in a test box coupler, then mailed to the patient for a 4-week field trial.

Study 2 (Open-Fit corrections)

Participants with hearing loss will be fitted monaurally with 12 stock non-custom, receiver in the canal (RIC) or receiver in the aid (RITA) hearing aids using the standard in-situ approach and test box measures will be made of each fitting to develop correction factors for these styles.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Study 3 (open-fit comparison)

This group will serve as the active comparator group for experienced hearing aid user receiving replacement receiver in the canal (RIC) or receiver in the aid (RITA) hearing aids with OPEN coupling using the standard of care approach, then undergoing a 4-week field trial.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Study 3 (open-fit comparison)

Intervention Type DEVICE

This group will serve as the active comparator group for experienced hearing aid user receiving replacement receiver in the canal (RIC) or receiver in the aid (RITA) hearing aids with OPEN coupling using the standard of care approach, then undergoing a 4-week field trial.

Study 3 (closed-fit comparison)

This group will serve as the active comparator group for experienced hearing aid user receiving replacement receiver in the canal (RIC) or receiver in the aid (RITA) hearing aids with CLOSED coupling using the standard of care approach, then undergoing a 4-week field trial.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Study 3 (closed-fit comparison)

Intervention Type DEVICE

This group will serve as the active comparator group for experienced hearing aid user receiving replacement receiver in the canal (RIC) or receiver in the aid (RITA) hearing aids with CLOSED coupling using the standard of care approach, then undergoing a 4-week field trial.

Study 3 (experimental open-fit)

Experienced hearing aid user receiving replacement receiver in the canal (RIC) or receiver in the aid (RITA) hearing aids with OPEN coupling that are fitted and verified in a test box coupler, then mailed to the patient for a 4-week field trial.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Study 3 (experimental open-fit)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Experienced hearing aid user receiving replacement receiver in the canal (RIC) or receiver in the aid (RITA) hearing aids with OPEN coupling that are fitted and verified in a test box coupler, then mailed to the patient for a 4-week field trial.

Study 3 (experimental closed-fit)

Experienced hearing aid user receiving replacement receiver in the canal (RIC) or receiver in the aid (RITA) hearing aids with CLOSED coupling that are fitted and verified in a test box coupler, then mailed to the patient for a 4-week field trial.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Study 3 (experimental closed-fit)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Experienced hearing aid user receiving replacement receiver in the canal (RIC) or receiver in the aid (RITA) hearing aids with CLOSED coupling that are fitted and verified in a test box coupler, then mailed to the patient for a 4-week field trial.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Study 1 - ITE hearing aids

Experienced users of in-the-ear (ITE) hearing aids will receive replacement ITE hearing aids that are fitted and verified in a test box coupler, then mailed to the patient for a 4-week field trial.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Study 1 - BTE hearing aids

Experienced users of behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aids will receive replacement BTE hearing aids that are fitted and verified in a test box coupler, then mailed to the patient for a 4-week field trial.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Study 3 (open-fit comparison)

This group will serve as the active comparator group for experienced hearing aid user receiving replacement receiver in the canal (RIC) or receiver in the aid (RITA) hearing aids with OPEN coupling using the standard of care approach, then undergoing a 4-week field trial.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Study 3 (closed-fit comparison)

This group will serve as the active comparator group for experienced hearing aid user receiving replacement receiver in the canal (RIC) or receiver in the aid (RITA) hearing aids with CLOSED coupling using the standard of care approach, then undergoing a 4-week field trial.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Study 3 (experimental open-fit)

Experienced hearing aid user receiving replacement receiver in the canal (RIC) or receiver in the aid (RITA) hearing aids with OPEN coupling that are fitted and verified in a test box coupler, then mailed to the patient for a 4-week field trial.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Study 3 (experimental closed-fit)

Experienced hearing aid user receiving replacement receiver in the canal (RIC) or receiver in the aid (RITA) hearing aids with CLOSED coupling that are fitted and verified in a test box coupler, then mailed to the patient for a 4-week field trial.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Study 1 and 3

* experienced hearing-aid users who are obtaining replacement VA-issued hearing aids of the same style and manufacturer as their current hearing aids
* no more than a moderate sensorineural hearing loss (defined as \< 60 dB HL pure-tone average at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz AU)
* symmetrical hearing between the ears as defined as no more than a 20 dB difference in pure-tone thresholds at two consecutive frequencies
* 50% word-recognition abilities in quiet as measured during the diagnostic audiologic evaluation
* An education-adjusted score of \>21 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment
* ability to read and write in English

Study 2 Veterans aged 18-85 years with sensorineural hearing loss

Exclusion Criteria

Study 1 and 3

* outer or middle ear pathology as determined by otoscopy, immittance, and/or audiometric testing (e.g., conductive or mixed losses)
* a significant change in hearing on audiogram obtained during the current study and that obtained when fitted with the current (to-be replaced) hearing aids as defined by a 15 dB decline in thresholds at three consecutive frequencies in either ear
* lack of phone or non-use of the phone
* unwilling or unable to be mailed hearing aids
* co-morbid condition that would preclude their participation

Study 2

* co-morbid condition that would preclude their participation
* outer or middle ear pathology as determined by otoscopy, immittance, and/or audiometric testing (e.g., conductive or mixed losses)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Candice M Quinn, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

C2777-R

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Fatigue and Hearing Loss.
NCT04875117 COMPLETED