Neural Predictors of Social Emotion Regulation Training

NCT ID: NCT03487081

Last Updated: 2020-01-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

62 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-07-02

Study Completion Date

2019-02-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the basic psychological and neural mechanisms underlying the social regulation of emotion - that is, how one person's actions can impact, or regulate - the emotions of another person - and how this ability changes with practice. As such, this study is not designed to directly address clinical health outcomes and provide no treatment or intervention.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Prior research has demonstrated that helping others regulate their emotions has benefits for the support provider. But little is known about the basic brain mechanisms underlying this ability or how this ability can change with practice. To address these questions, this study has two parts. In the first, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is used to gain insight into the brain systems involved in helping others regulate negative emotions by comparing them to the brain systems involved in regulating the participants' own negative emotions. In the second part, participants engage in three weeks of structured practice, or training, in either socially regulating others' emotions or in self-regulating their own emotions. The investigators predict that helping others regulate their emotions will involve many of the same brain regions implicated in regulating one's own emotions, in addition to regions involved in perspective taking and the reward of helping others. Further, when relating the brain data from part 1 to the regulation practice data from part 2, the investigators expect that individuals who in part 1 show greater activity in brain regions supporting either social or self-regulation may be more likely in part 2 to show corresponding improvements in regulation performance. The results of these studies are intended to lay the groundwork for future studies investigating the social regulation of emotion in older adults and clinical populations for whom social support can be beneficial.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Emotions Rumination

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Social regulation

Following the fMRI session, participants in the social regulation group will be asked to rate their mood twice a day for 3 weeks. Furthermore, every other day, they will receive one event written by another participant. They will be asked to help the other person use emotion regulation strategies to feel less negative. The participant will answer brief questions related to his/her feelings after receiving the event and after providing social emotion regulation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Social regulation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will be instructed to help another person think about their negative events differently using an emotion regulation strategy called reappraisal.

Self regulation

Following the fMRI session, participants in the self regulation group will be asked to rate their mood twice a day for 3 weeks. Furthermore, every other day, they will write an event that caused them negative emotions. They will be asked to use emotion regulation strategies to decrease their negative emotions. The participant will answer brief questions related to his/her feelings after writing the event and after implementing the emotion regulation strategy.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Self regulation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will be instructed to think about their negative events by reframing the meaning of the event. This is a typical strategy in emotion regulation research known as reappraisal.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Social regulation

Participants will be instructed to help another person think about their negative events differently using an emotion regulation strategy called reappraisal.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Self regulation

Participants will be instructed to think about their negative events by reframing the meaning of the event. This is a typical strategy in emotion regulation research known as reappraisal.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Native English speaker
* Right handed

Exclusion Criteria

* Current or past history of neurological or psychiatric illness
* Use of psychoactive drugs
* Individuals who have metal devices or implants that cannot be removed from their body (e.g., piercings, pacemakers, copper intrauterine devices (IUDs))
* Pregnant women
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute on Aging (NIA)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Columbia University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kevin Ochsner

Professor of Psychology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kevin Ochsner, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Psychology, Columbia University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Columbia University

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01AG043463

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

AAAR8654

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Neurofeedback for Tourette Syndrome
NCT01702077 COMPLETED NA