Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
82 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-01-18
2020-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Neuroplasticity in Auditory Aging_Project 2 Aims 1 and 2
NCT03475043
Peripheral and Central Influences on Auditory Temporal Processing & Speech Perception in Older Cochlear Implantees
NCT05554692
Speech Perception With High Cognitive Demand
NCT04698356
Effects of Stimulus Validity on Speech Recognition
NCT00013364
Spectral Dynamics and Speech Understanding by Hearing Impaired People
NCT01867515
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental group
Auditory training with feedback
Auditory training with feedback
Experimental group receives phoneme-level and sentence-level training with feedback
Passive control group
Pre-post testing only; no training
No interventions assigned to this group
Active Control group
Listening task with no feeback
Listening paradigm with no feedback
Active controls listen to acoustic stimuli with no feedback
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Auditory training with feedback
Experimental group receives phoneme-level and sentence-level training with feedback
Listening paradigm with no feedback
Active controls listen to acoustic stimuli with no feedback
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Younger listeners (18-40 years) with normal hearing;
* Older listeners (65-80 years) with normal hearing;
* Older listeners (65-80 years) with bilateral, mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss.
* High School Diploma,
* native speaker of English (based on self-report)
* normal middle-ear function (based on tympanometry)
* normal cognitive function (based on score on Montreal Cognitive Assessment)
* good-to-excellent word recognition scores (based on Northwestern University Test # 6 word recognition scores presented in quiet at suprathreshold levels).
Exclusion Criteria
* motor and/or speech disorders that prevent participant from providing a time-locked response,
* presence of middle ear disease or conductive hearing loss,
* presence of severe or profound hearing loss,
* presence of poor word recognition scores,
* cognitive impairment.
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Maryland, College Park
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sandra Gordon Salant
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sandra Gordon-Salant, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Maryland
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Maryland
College Park, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gordon-Salant S, Yeni-Komshian GH, Bieber RE, Jara Ureta DA, Freund MS, Fitzgibbons PJ. Effects of Listener Age and Native Language Experience on Recognition of Accented and Unaccented English Words. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Apr 26;62(4S):1131-1143. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-ASCC7-18-0122.
Bieber RE, Yeni-Komshian GH, Freund MS, Fitzgibbons PJ, Gordon-Salant S. Effects of listener age and native language on perception of accented and unaccented sentences. J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 Dec;144(6):3191. doi: 10.1121/1.5081711.
Bieber RE, Gordon-Salant S. Adaptation to novel foreign-accented speech and retention of benefit following training: Influence of aging and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Apr;141(4):2800. doi: 10.1121/1.4980063.
Fitzgibbons PJ, Gordon-Salant S. Age effects in discrimination of intervals within accented tone sequences differing in accent type and sequence presentation rate. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Nov;140(5):3819. doi: 10.1121/1.4967512.
Gordon-Salant S, Yeni-Komshian GH, Pickett EJ, Fitzgibbons PJ. Perception of contrastive bi-syllabic lexical stress in unaccented and accented words by younger and older listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Mar;139(3):1132-48. doi: 10.1121/1.4943557.
Gordon-Salant S, Yeni-Komshian GH, Fitzgibbons PJ, Cohen JI. Effects of age and hearing loss on recognition of unaccented and accented multisyllabic words. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Feb;137(2):884-97. doi: 10.1121/1.4906270.
Gordon-Salant S, Yeni-Komshian GH, Fitzgibbons PJ, Cohen JI, Waldroup C. Recognition of accented and unaccented speech in different maskers by younger and older listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Jul;134(1):618-27. doi: 10.1121/1.4807817.
Gordon-Salant S, Yeni-Komshian GH, Fitzgibbons PJ. Recognition of accented English in quiet and noise by younger and older listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Nov;128(5):3152-60. doi: 10.1121/1.3495940.
Gordon-Salant S, Yeni-Komshian GH, Fitzgibbons PJ, Schurman J. Short-term adaptation to accented English by younger and older adults. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Oct;128(4):EL200-4. doi: 10.1121/1.3486199.
Gordon-Salant S, Yeni-Komshian GH, Fitzgibbons PJ. Recognition of accented English in quiet by younger normal-hearing listeners and older listeners with normal-hearing and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Jul;128(1):444-55. doi: 10.1121/1.3397409.
Fitzgibbons PJ, Gordon-Salant S. Age-related differences in discrimination of temporal intervals in accented tone sequences. Hear Res. 2010 Jun 1;264(1-2):41-7. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.11.008. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UMDCP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.