Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
18 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-07-31
2013-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Computer-Based Auditory Rehabilitation
NCT02147847
Neuroplasticity in Auditory Aging_Project 2 Aims 1 and 2
NCT03475043
Speech Intelligibility and Cognition: Are Inpatients Impaired by Noise?
NCT00695162
Hearing Aids for Veterans With Functional Hearing Difficulties
NCT06117254
Improving Speech in Noise Perception for Individuals With Age-related Hearing Loss
NCT07192757
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
We have developed perceptual learning paradigms that drive this rehabilitative reorganization and significantly improve speech discrimination in new HA users. We now propose to test improved training paradigms in new and experienced HA users and older subjects with normal hearing. In Exp. 1 we will evaluate baseline speech discrimination in these populations using speech-reception thresholds (SRTs) in sentences, consonant-vowel-consonant nonsense syllable tests (CVC-NST), tests of tone-pattern discrimination, and tests of auditory short-term verbal memory (ASTVM). An analysis of the correlations of these measures will provide information about basic processes underlying impaired word and sentence identification. In Exp. 2 we will investigate the effects of CVC-identification training using performance-adapted masking noise. Based on our previous results, we anticipate that training will significantly improve CVC-NST scores. We will examine the extent to which training improves SRTs, tone-pattern processing, and ASTVM. In Exp. 3 we will train subjects in a tone-pattern identification task to evaluate the extent to which non-phonetic factors (e.g., familiarity with the computerized hearing tests, placebo effects of training, improvements in auditory attention, etc.) may contribute to training benefit. In Exp. 4 we will compare the benefits of training with single-consonant syllables with the benefits of two-consonant syllable training studied in Exp. 2. Finally, in Exp. 5 we will study the benefits of CVC training using consonant-specific noise levels adjusted to compensate for intrinsic differences in the discriminability of different consonants and compare them to the benefits of global adaptive training from Exp. 2. The experiments will clarify fundamental mechanisms underlying deficits in speech discrimination and ASTVM, provide insight into the nature of training-related improvements, and elucidate the parameters needed to optimize hearing rehabilitation.
Relevance to the VA patient care mission: HAs are relatively ineffective in improving the ability of hearing-impaired subjects to understand speech in many everyday listening situations. These experiments will clarify the extent to which perceptual training can improve speech discrimination and enhance ASTVM in these conditions in new and experienced HA users and older subjects with normal hearing. Perceptual training could potentially benefit millions of veterans who wear HAs as well as older veterans with normal hearing who experience difficulties in understanding and remembering speech.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm 1
Hearing impaired listeners with hearing aids underwent two months of consonant identification training in their homes.
Consonant Identification Training
Subjects received psychophysically adaptive, consonant identification training in consonant discrimination on PCs in their homes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Consonant Identification Training
Subjects received psychophysically adaptive, consonant identification training in consonant discrimination on PCs in their homes.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Older subjects with mild sensorineural hearing loss who have recently received hearing aids.
* Some young subjects with normal hearing for developing training paradigms.
Exclusion Criteria
* Dementia.
18 Years
78 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
US Department of Veterans Affairs
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David L. Woods, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
VA Northern California HCS
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Woods DL, Doss Z, Herron TJ, Yund EW. Age-related changes in consonant and sentence processing. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(8):1277-91. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2011.08.0150.
Woods DL, Yund EW, Herron TJ, Ua Cruadhlaoich MA. Consonant identification in consonant-vowel-consonant syllables in speech-spectrum noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Mar;127(3):1609-23. doi: 10.1121/1.3293005.
Woods DL, Yund EW, Herron TJ. Measuring consonant identification in nonsense syllables, words, and sentences. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(3):243-60. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2009.04.0040.
Yund EW, Woods DL. Content and procedural learning in repeated sentence tests of speech perception. Ear Hear. 2010 Dec;31(6):769-78. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e68e4a.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
C4739-R
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.