Effectiveness of Hearing-aid Based Wind-noise Algorithm
NCT ID: NCT00738244
Last Updated: 2011-09-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
60 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2007-11-30
2009-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Subjects will be seen for four visits to the laboratory. The first visit will involve documentation of informed consent, and measurement of hearing thresholds. The second, third and fourth visits will consist of testing with the following measures (in random order for each subject) to determine if the various implementations of the wind noise reduction algorithm 1) impact speech perception ability, and/or 2) impact sound quality perception. Each session will take approximately 1.5 hours, with a maximum of six hours over all the sessions. The two speech perception tests that will be utilized include : 1) Connected Speech Test and Hearing in Noise Test, 2) The Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) (Nilsson, Soli, \& Sullivan, 1994; Koch, Nilsson \& Soli, 1995. Overall Impression of Sound Quality and Ratings of Annoyance will be used as subjective, or self-reported, measures of preference. Overall Impression will be influenced by the audibility and masking effect of the noise bursts, whereas Annoyance ratings are significantly correlated to the high frequency emphasis of the stimulus, a potential impact of the extreme suppression conditions (e.g., -18 dB) (Warner \& Bentler, 2002; Miedema \& Vos, 2003). Both measures will be analyzed as a function of the different time constants, gain reduction levels, and level of presentation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CROSSOVER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Normal hearing listeners
No interventions assigned to this group
2
Listeners with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Normal or mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
NIH
University of Iowa
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ruth Ann Bentler
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ruth A Bentler, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Iowa
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Wendell Johnson Center, University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.