Study Investigating Role of Unalike Patient Positioning on PROMIS Scores

NCT ID: NCT03446950

Last Updated: 2020-06-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

155 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-03-06

Study Completion Date

2020-05-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective is to assess the impact of patient positioning using the candy cane stirrups as compared to boot stirrups on physical functioning outcomes at 6 weeks post-op

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patient positioning is an important component of vaginal surgery allowing the surgeon access to the vagina while minimizing patient discomfort and neurological injury. The data on appropriate patient positioning for gynecological vaginal surgery is limited with most providers basing the choice between candy cane and boot stirrups on personal preference. This study has the following aims:

* Aim 1: To perform a randomized controlled trial comparing candy cane stirrups to boot stirrups in patients undergoing vaginal surgery with the primary outcome of change in physical function at 6 weeks post-op as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement and Information System (PROMISĀ®) 20-Item Physical Functioning Short-Form.
* Aim 2: The investigators aim to measure the angles at the level of hip, knee and foot joints during the surgery in both the candy cane and boot stirrups to assess any association between angles and physical function

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Physical Activity Surgery Vaginal Hysterectomy Vaginal Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

To compare patient positioning during vaginal surgery we plan to conduct a single site single blinded randomized controlled trial where patients planning elective vaginal surgery will be randomized to be positioned in Candy cane or Boot stirrups
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Participants will be blinded to their intervention group. Investigators following up with participants at 6 weeks will be blinded to the group allocation of the participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Candy Cane

Participants in this arm will be positioned with their legs in candy cane stirrups. Patients will then undergo scheduled vaginal surgery and be asked to complete PROMIS questionnaires before and after surgery.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Vaginal Surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients will undergo elective surgery on vagina or bladder

Boot Stirrups

Participants in this arm will have their feet placed in boot stirrups. Patients will then undergo scheduled vaginal surgery and be asked to complete PROMIS questionnaires before and after surgery.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Vaginal Surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients will undergo elective surgery on vagina or bladder

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Vaginal Surgery

Patients will undergo elective surgery on vagina or bladder

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \> 18 years
* English speaking
* Scheduled to undergo vaginal or urological surgery with University of Louisville Urogynecology physicians

Exclusion Criteria

* Immobile or wheelchair bound
* Pre-existing neurological condition limiting physical function
* Age \< 18 years
* Patient's with dementia or unable to give informed consent
* Non-English speaking
* Unwilling to follow up in 6 weeks
* Patient's undergoing laparoscopic, robotic or abdominal surgery or surgery through a combined approach
* Patients undergoing surgery under local anesthesia
* Patients who will be awake during positioning
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Louisville

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sean Francis

Chairperson & Assoc Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sean L Francis, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Louisville

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Louisville Physicians

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fleisch MC, Bremerich D, Schulte-Mattler W, Tannen A, Teichmann AT, Bader W, Balzer K, Renner SP, Romer T, Roth S, Schutz F, Thill M, Tinneberg H, Zarras K. The Prevention of Positioning Injuries during Gynecologic Operations. Guideline of DGGG (S1-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/077, February 2015). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2015 Aug;75(8):792-807. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1557776.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26365999 (View on PubMed)

Bohrer JC, Walters MD, Park A, Polston D, Barber MD. Pelvic nerve injury following gynecologic surgery: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;201(5):531.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.023. Epub 2009 Sep 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19761997 (View on PubMed)

Gumus E, Kendirci M, Horasanli K, Tanriverdi O, Gidemez G, Miroglu C. Neurapraxic complications in operations performed in the lithotomy position. World J Urol. 2002 May;20(1):68-71. doi: 10.1007/s00345-001-0241-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12088195 (View on PubMed)

Cardosi RJ, Cox CS, Hoffman MS. Postoperative neuropathies after major pelvic surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Aug;100(2):240-4. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02052-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12151144 (View on PubMed)

Litwiller JP, Wells RE Jr, Halliwill JR, Carmichael SW, Warner MA. Effect of lithotomy positions on strain of the obturator and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves. Clin Anat. 2004 Jan;17(1):45-9. doi: 10.1002/ca.10168.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14695587 (View on PubMed)

Power H. Patient positioning outcomes for women undergoing gynaecological surgeries. Can Oper Room Nurs J. 2002 Sep;20(3):7-10, 27-30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12271555 (View on PubMed)

Sung VW, Wohlrab KJ, Madsen A, Raker C. Patient-reported goal attainment and comprehensive functioning outcomes after surgery compared with pessary for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;215(5):659.e1-659.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.013. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27319365 (View on PubMed)

Gupta A, Meriwether K, Tuller M, Sekula M, Gaskins J, Stewart JR, Hobson D, Cardenas-Trowers O, Francis S. Candy Cane Compared With Boot Stirrups in Vaginal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;136(2):333-341. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003954.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32649498 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

18.0061

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.