Effects of Hip Distraction Without a Perineal Post on Venous Blood Flow and Peripheral Nerve Conduction
NCT ID: NCT03417934
Last Updated: 2019-08-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
40 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-01-08
2018-08-13
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Warmed Irrigation in Hip Arthroscopy Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy
NCT03453866
Positioning for Hip Arthroscopic Surgery to Reduce Postoperative Numbness
NCT05038709
A Study of Posterior Hip Precautions After Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT03341442
Dislocation Precautions
NCT03806114
Clinical Analysis of Suction Drainage in Cementless Hip Replacement
NCT04333264
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Hip Arthroscopy Procedure
The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate the effects of hip distraction without a perineal post on the lower extremity during hip arthroscopic procedures by peri-operative monitoring of various prognostic markers for venous, nerve and tissue injury.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Has elected to undergo a standard hip arthroscopic procedure that is expected to require access to the central compartment of the hip joint (bilateral hip enrollment is allowed)
* Is able to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this clinical investigation and has signed an informed consent document
Exclusion Criteria
* Significant peripheral vascular disease characterized by diminished dorsalis pedis or tibial pulse
* Significant peripheral neuropathy demonstrated by nerve conduction velocity test
* Preoperative use of statins or other medications known to elevate serum CPK-MM levels within one week of surgery
* Total hip replacement of the indicated hip(s)
* History of substance abuse within past 12 months (this includes any chronic narcotic use)
* Any significant psychological disturbance past or present, psychotic or neurotic, that could impair the informed consent process
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Colorado, Denver
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Omer Mei-Dan, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Colorado, Denver
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Colorado, Hip Preservation Center, Orthopedic Department
Boulder, Colorado, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Byrd JW, Chern KY. Traction versus distension for distraction of the joint during hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 1997 Jun;13(3):346-9. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(97)90032-3.
Kelly BT, Buly RL. Hip arthroscopy update. HSS J. 2005 Sep;1(1):40-8. doi: 10.1007/s11420-005-0105-3.
Smart LR, Oetgen M, Noonan B, Medvecky M. Beginning hip arthroscopy: indications, positioning, portals, basic techniques, and complications. Arthroscopy. 2007 Dec;23(12):1348-53. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.06.020. Epub 2007 Oct 3.
Eriksson E, Arvidsson I, Arvidsson H. Diagnostic and operative arthroscopy of the hip. Orthopedics. 1986 Feb;9(2):169-76. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19860201-07.
Mei-Dan O, Kraeutler MJ, Garabekyan T, Goodrich JA, Young DA. Hip Distraction Without a Perineal Post: A Prospective Study of 1000 Hip Arthroscopy Cases. Am J Sports Med. 2018 Mar;46(3):632-641. doi: 10.1177/0363546517741704. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
Baber YF, Robinson AH, Villar RN. Is diagnostic arthroscopy of the hip worthwhile? A prospective review of 328 adults investigated for hip pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999 Jul;81(4):600-3. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.81b4.8803.
Byrd JW. Chapter 16. Complications associated with hip arthroscopy. In Operative Hip Arthroscopy (2nd edition); Springer: New York, 2005.
Ilizaliturri VM Jr. Complications of arthroscopic femoroacetabular impingement treatment: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Mar;467(3):760-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0618-4. Epub 2008 Nov 19.
McCarthy JC, Lee JA. Hip arthroscopy: indications, outcomes, and complications. Instr Course Lect. 2006;55:301-8.
Bushnell BD, Anz AW, Bert JM. Venous thromboembolism in lower extremity arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2008 May;24(5):604-11. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.11.010. Epub 2008 Jan 7.
Bushnell BD, Dahners LE. Fatal pulmonary embolism in a polytraumatized patient following hip arthroscopy. Orthopedics. 2009 Jan;32(1):56. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20090101-01.
Jones SC, Fernau R, Woeltjen BL. Use of somatosensory evoked potentials to detect peripheral ischemia and potential injury resulting from positioning of the surgical patient: case reports and discussion. Spine J. 2004 May-Jun;4(3):360-2. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.08.023.
Chung I, Glow JA, Dimopoulos V, Walid MS, Smisson HF, Johnston KW, Robinson JS, Grigorian AA. Upper-limb somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in lumbosacral spine surgery: a prognostic marker for position-related ulnar nerve injury. Spine J. 2009 Apr;9(4):287-95. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.05.004. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
Pereles TR, Stuchin SA, Kastenbaum DM, Beric A, Lacagnino G, Kabir H. Surgical maneuvers placing the sciatic nerve at risk during total hip arthroplasty as assessed by somatosensory evoked potential monitoring. J Arthroplasty. 1996 Jun;11(4):438-44. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(96)80034-9.
Demers C, Marcoux S, Ginsberg JS, Laroche F, Cloutier R, Poulin J. Incidence of venographically proved deep vein thrombosis after knee arthroscopy. Arch Intern Med. 1998 Jan 12;158(1):47-50. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.1.47.
Delis KT, Hunt N, Strachan RK, Nicolaides AN. Incidence, natural history and risk factors of deep vein thrombosis in elective knee arthroscopy. Thromb Haemost. 2001 Sep;86(3):817-21.
Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Forgie M, Kearon C, Dreyer J, Kovacs G, Mitchell M, Lewandowski B, Kovacs MJ. Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2003 Sep 25;349(13):1227-35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa023153.
Ennis RS. Deep Venous Thrombosis Prophylaxis in Orthopedic Surgery. eMedicine; June 12, 2009. http)/emedicine.medscape.com/article/1268573-overview. Webpage accessed December 8, 2009.
Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 May;10(2):307-12. doi: 10.1111/j..2002.384.doc.x.
Merritt CR. Ultrasound safety: what are the issues? Radiology. 1989 Nov;173(2):304-6. doi: 10.1148/radiology.173.2.2678243. No abstract available.
BlueCross BlueShield of Texas. Intra-operative Neurophysiologic Monitoring (Sensory-Evoked Potentials, Motor Evoked Potentials, EMG Monitoring). Medical Policy Bulletin (MED 205.011); Effective Date: 12/11/03.
Martin HD, Palmer IJ, Champlin K, Kaiser B, Kelly B, Leunig M. Physiological changes as a result of hip arthroscopy performed with traction. Arthroscopy. 2012 Oct;28(10):1365-72. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.04.139. Epub 2012 Aug 21.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
17-0930
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.