Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
34 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-11-30
2024-01-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In the r21 part of this grant, the investigators designed and constructed a combined TMS/EEG/fMRI system. With that equipment the investigators found that TMS pulses have different effects deeper in the brain as a function of the EEG alpha phase. Pulses delivered during a rising phase produce larger blood flow changes deeper in the brain than do pulses delivered during a falling phase.
In the R33 phase of the grant the investigators now take that idea into a small clinical trial in depression to test if synchronized pulses have a larger clinical effect than do non-synchronized pulses.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Individualized (fMRI-guided) TMS Treatment for Depression
NCT06266390
The Antidepressant Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)Compared to ECT
NCT00299403
Electroencephalography-based Precise Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Treatment
NCT06385405
Brain-oscillation Synchronised Stimulation of the Prefrontal Cortex
NCT02920840
TMS With Real-time E-field and EEG Source Imaging
NCT06645613
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The goal of the R33 phase of this R21/R33 grant is to test the hypothesis that synchronized stimulation has clinical implications; specifically that the increased rACC inhibition due to increased cortical activation of the DLPFC by synchronizing the TMS pulse application to an individual patient's alpha rhythm will have a significant effect on the anti-depressive treatment response rate for TMS, sufficient to justify a future, more extensive clinical trial.
In this study, the investigators will look first at the BOLD activity from the rACC as a measure of target engagement because there is a substantial literature suggesting that reductions in activity in the rACC are an integral part of the depression network and may predict eventual antidepressant effect. 1-5 Moreover, the investigators and others have shown that stimulation of the left DLPFC causes a reciprocal change in rACC. 6-9. The studies proposed for the R33 will randomize a cohort of 60 medication free depressed patients to standard TMS treatment (NON-SYNC) or timing optimized TMS treatment (SYNC). For the later cohort the investigators will use the results of the R21 phase to measure the optimum timing of the TMS pulses with respect to each individual's EEG rhythms to maximize inhibition of the rACC following TMS. This will be done at entry into the trial and after the therapy is complete. Both experimental and control group will undergo these measurements but they will only be used in the former group. To enable the 4 week (5 days/wk) TMS treatment plan to be able to use this individually determined timing, the investigators will integrate a second EEG system with our treatment TMS unit. The R33 specific aims are:
Specific Aim 1: Integrate a similar EEG system with our treatment TMS scanner with similar feedback circuitry as that in SA 3 in the R21.
Specific Aim 2: Carry out a 4 week trial (2 extra weeks for responders but not remitters) of anti-depressive therapy randomized between optimum timed TMS (SYNC) and standardized non-synchronous TMS (NON-SYNC) in a cohort of depressed patients to estimate the success rate of such an optimized treatment.
This study will provide the data needed for a go/no-go decision on a full clinical trial for this potential novel therapy.
Hypothesis: In a double blind, randomized (1:1) trial enrolling only at MUSC over three years in 60 treatment resistant depressed patients, we hypothesize that daily prefrontal rTMS over 4-6 weeks with the initial TMS pulse of each train synchronized to the subject's alpha phase (SYNC TMS), will result in improvement in depression, and that these improvements will be greater than the improvements seen using the same form of treatment but not with the initial pulse synchronized (NON-SYNC). As this work is a first ever use of this technology, the investigators wish to compare the antidepressant effects to standard therapy to see if synchronization boosts the clinical effect. A power analysis for this number of subjects exists but the investigators are really most interested in comparing the overall outcome between the two groups, and looking at response predictors. Thus it is not a formal efficacy or even inferiority trial, rather a comparative early phase trial.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
SYNC TMS
Patients will receive daily left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), 120% MT, 3000 pulses/session, for 30 sessions. They will have EEG and the TMS will be delivered at their individual alpha frequency (IAF) (8-12 Hz) and the first TMS pulse in each train of 40 pulses will be synchronized with the EEG so that the TMS pulse fires during the rising phase of the alpha rhythm.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
TMS
Non-Sync TMS
Patients will receive daily left prefrontal transcranial Magnetic stimulation (TMS), 120% MT, 3000 pulses/session, for 30 sessions. They will have EEG and the TMS will be delivered at their individual alpha frequency (IAF) (8-12 Hz) and the first TMS pulse in each train of 40 pulses will NOT be synchronized with the EEG so that the TMS pulse fires during the rising phase of the alpha rhythm. This is the way conventional TMS is delivered now and is FDA approved.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
TMS
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
TMS
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Pretreatment Hamilton score ≥ 20
3. Age between 21 and 70 years
4. Fixed and stable antidepressant medications for 3 weeks prior and during the rTMS trial. Limit on benzodiazapenes to lorazepam (or equivalent) up to 3 mg every day
5. Moderate level of resistance to antidepressant treatment in the current episode, defined as failure of 1-4 adequate medication trials or intolerance to at least 3 trials, and duration of current episode ≤ 3 years
6. No history of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, other \[non mood disorder\] psychosis, depression secondary to a medical condition, mental retardation, substance dependence or abuse within the past year (except nicotine), bipolar disorder, psychotic features in this or previous episodes, amnestic disorder, dementia or MMSE ≤24, delirium, obsessive compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, panic disorder
7. No current Vagus Nerve Stimulation
8. No history of failing to respond to an adequate course of ECT in this or any episode, and no ECT within the past 3 months
9. No contraindication to MRI
10. No contraindication to rTMS (history of neurological disorder or seizure (except induced by ECT), increased intracranial pressure, brain surgery, or head trauma with loss of consciousness for \>15 minutes, implanted electronic device, metal in the head, or pregnancy)
11. No history of autoimmune, endocrine, viral, or vascular disorder. No unstable cardiac disease, uncontrolled hypertension, or sleep apnea
12. No active suicidal intent or plan, or history of attempt within the past 12 months
13. Willing to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients must have a recordable alpha frequency.
21 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
NIH
Medical University of South Carolina
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mark S George, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical University of South Carolina
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Medical University of South Carolina Brain Stimulation Division
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00074695
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.