The Antidepressant Efficacy of Low Frequency rTMS as add-on
NCT ID: NCT02966106
Last Updated: 2017-11-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-12-31
2017-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Fewer studies have used right prefrontal, which has less side effects, such as local discomfort and a lower risk of releasing epileptic seizures, than high frequency stimulation .Both stimulus models has been shown to have statistically significant antidepressant effect and recent research clearly indicates that low frequency rTMS of the right prefrontal cortex i associated with an antidepressant effect at the same level as the high frequency model. Therefore the investigators want to examine the antidepressant effect of a specific rTMS low frequency model in a clinical setting using a placebo controlled, randomized double blind design.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The majority of clinically controlled studies have used high frequency stimulation of the left frontal cortex , which has been approved by the USA FDA (1) and later in EU for the treatment of depression.
Fewer studies have used right prefrontal, which has less side effects, such as local discomfort and a lower risk of releasing epileptic seizures, than high frequency stimulation . In addition low frequency rTMS is generally less time-consuming. Both stimulus models has been shown to have a modest, statistically significant antidepressant effect and recent research clearly indicates that low frequency rTMS of the right prefrontal cortex i associated with an antidepressant effect at the same level as the high frequency model. The issue indicates that low frequency due to the more advantagous side effect profile should be the stimulus model of choice in a clinical setting.
Therefore the investigators want to examine the antidepressant effect of a specific rTMS low frequency model in a clinical setting using a placebo controlled, randomized double blind design.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Right prefrontal low frequency rTMS.
Right prefrontal low frequency rTMS (1Hz). A treatment session each day in four weeks apart from weekends. Each session is administered with 2 pulse trains of 180 sec with a 2 min interval
Right prefrontal low frequency rTMS
A treatment session each day in four weeks apart from weekends. Each session is administered with 2 pulse trains of 180 sec with a 2 min interval
Sham-rTMS
Right prefrontal rTMS sham treatment. A treatment session each day in four weeks apart from weekends. Each session is administered with 2 pulse trains of 180 sec with a 2 min interval
Sham-rTMS
Right prefrontal rTMS sham treatment. A treatment session each day in four weeks apart from weekends. Each session is administered with 2 pulse trains of 180 sec with a 2 min interval
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Right prefrontal low frequency rTMS
A treatment session each day in four weeks apart from weekends. Each session is administered with 2 pulse trains of 180 sec with a 2 min interval
Sham-rTMS
Right prefrontal rTMS sham treatment. A treatment session each day in four weeks apart from weekends. Each session is administered with 2 pulse trains of 180 sec with a 2 min interval
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Moderate-severe uni- and bipolar depression according to ICD-10
3. Age 18-80 years
Exclusion Criteria
2. Epileptic seizure \< 2 years
3. Patients with implanted metal parts in the brain or chest
4. Patients with pacemaker
5. Medical diseases with cerebral impact
6. Serious suicidal danger
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Aarhus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Poul Erik Buchholtz, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Aarhus University Hospital, Risskov
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AMB-TMS-16
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id