Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
35 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-04-01
2019-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To investigate the correlation between blood concentration of specific inflammation makers and change in depressive symptoms during treatment
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Antidepressant Effect of Right Temporal Low Frequency rTMS Compared to Sham
NCT00622947
The Antidepressant Efficacy of Low Frequency rTMS as add-on
NCT02966106
The Antidepressant Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)Compared to ECT
NCT00299403
Clinical, Cognitive and Neural Effects of Potentiation of ECT by rTMS in Treatment-Resistant Depression
NCT06391723
The Antidepressant Effect of Right Prefrontal Low Frequency rTMS in an Accelerated Treatment Model
NCT03868774
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Both methods expose the brain to an electric current. But while ECT is associated with global cerebral stimulation elicited by an epileptic seizure, rTMS implies non-convulsive focal stimulation through a time varying magnetic field. Thus, the antidepressant effect of rTMS does not depend on seizure activity and consequently requires no anesthesia. In addition, rTMS seems not to be associated with cognitive disturbances.
Previous research indicates that the antidepressant effect of rTMS is associated with specific stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The majority of clinically controlled studies have used high frequency stimulation of the left frontal cortex (1-4). Few have used right prefrontal low frequency rTMS, which has less side effects, such as local discomfort and a lower risk of releasing epileptic seizures, than high frequency stimulation (5-10). Both models have been used with varying results. Meta-analysis of the antidepressant effect of rTMS (11,x) have found a modest, statistically significant antidepressant effect but generally definite conclusions on the antidepressant effect of rTMS has been difficult to draw, probably because of small and selected study populations, varying ways of stimulation and other confounding factors in the clinical setting.
The important clinical question of whether rTMS may substitute ECT in the treatment of depression has almost exclusively been elucidated in studies using high frequency stimulation of the left frontal cortex. Some of these suggest that the effectiveness of rTMS is equal to that of ECT in non-delusional patients (12-19). However, a recent investigation has compared the antidepressant efficacy and side effects of right prefrontal low frequency rTMS with ECT. In this study the mean Hamilton total 17-item (HAM-D score) scores were reduced significantly over time in both groups (ECT: p\<0.001, rTMS: p\<0.001); but ECT was more effective than rTMS on a short term after 3 weeks of treatment. The outcome did not point to right frontal low frequency rTMS as a first line substitute for ECT, but it might have place in the treatment of depression as add on to other types of treatment.
ECT is normally administered 3 times a week for 3-4 weeks. Daily treatment sessions might accelerate remission, but is impossible because of cognitive side effects. However, rTMS seems not to be associated with reduction in cognitive performance and might potentiate the antidepressant efficacy of ECT. Therefore the investigators have found it clinical interesting to investigate in which degree low frequency right prefrontal rTMS used ad add-on may potentiate the antidepressant effect of unilateral ECT and accelerate remission .
In addition we want to investigate te correlation between change in depressive symptoms and
-blood concentration of specific inflammation CNS- makers
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
low frequency rTMS
Right prefrontal Low frequency (1 hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, administered with 2 sessions each week
Low frequency (1 hz) rTMS, as add-on to ECT
Right prefrontal Low frequency (1 hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as add-on to ECT.
Sham-rTMS
Sham right prefrontal rTMS 2 times a week
Sham-rTMS
Right prefrontal Low frequency (1 hz) sham-stimulation using af double blind placebo coil as add-on to ECT.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Low frequency (1 hz) rTMS, as add-on to ECT
Right prefrontal Low frequency (1 hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as add-on to ECT.
Sham-rTMS
Right prefrontal Low frequency (1 hz) sham-stimulation using af double blind placebo coil as add-on to ECT.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients referred for ECT
* Age 18-80 years
* Moderate or severely depressed patients (ICD-10(DSM-IV)
* HAM-D score (17-item) ≥20 and/or Ham-D subscale ≥10.
Exclusion Criteria
* Epilepsy or disposition to epilepsy
* Metallic objects in chest or brain
* Cardiac pacemaker
* Somatic diseases associated with brain dysfunction
* Pregnancy
* Severe agitation or delirium
* Alcohol or drug dependence (ICD-10)
* Use of coercive measures
* The patient does not wish to participate
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Aarhus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Poul Erik Buchholtz
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Poul Erik Buchholtz, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Poul Erik Buchholtz, MD Telephone: 004578472109 Email: [email protected]
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Aarhus University Hospital, Risskov
Aarhus, Risskov, Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1-10-72-509-12
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.