Ethanol Gel Versus Steroid in Refractory Lumbar Discogenic Pain
NCT ID: NCT03415828
Last Updated: 2025-09-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
230 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-05-29
2027-05-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A clinical evaluation was performed by bibliographic route in 2016. Clinical data on more than 600 patients treated by DISCOGEL® were analyzed. These data should be confirmed by monitoring on the long term, with a large cohort of patients, over a two-year follow-up period.
As part of the post-CE surveillance, the manufacturer GELSCOM is responsible of this "Post-Market Clinical Follow-up" (PMCF) study in accordance with Directive 93/42/EEC and MEDDEV guide 2.12/2, to assess the efficacy and the long-term safety of DISCOGEL®.
The study is comparative. The results will evaluate the performance and safety of the CE-marked medical device used in "real life", in comparison with a steroid infiltration, used according to its indication and to the current standards. It will include economic data. Patients and evaluators will be blinded. Both DISCOGEL® and HYDROCORTANCYL 2,5 POUR CENT are authorized products used according to their intended use.
This is an interventional, prospective, national, multi-center, comparative, randomized, single-blind (patient and evaluator) post-market clinical study. The primary objective is to compare the short-term efficacy profile of DISCOGEL® versus intradiscal steroid.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
DISCOGEL ®: Evaluation of the Procedure DISCOGEL ® in Lumbar Radiculopathy on Slipped Disc
NCT03309371
Treatment of Discogenic Back Pain
NCT02089139
Intradiscal Discogel® in Resistant Sciatica
NCT02313350
Intradiscal Gelified Ethanol and Pulsed Radiofrequency Versus Gelified Ethanol Injection for Discogenic Low Back Pain
NCT02343484
Correlation Between RMI of Degenerative Disk Disease and Reduction of Pain After Disk-infiltration Treatments
NCT04142580
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ethanol gel
CE-marked medical device used according to its instructions for use: GELSCOM® Single injection in the selected disc(s) of 0.6 to 2.2 ml
Ethanol gel
Intradiscal injection of ethanol gel
Steroid infiltration
Authorized drug used according to its summary product characteristics: HYDROCORTANCYL 2,5 POUR CENT Single injection in the selected disc(s) of 0.2 to 2.0 ml
Prednisolone acetate
Intradiscal infiltration of steroids
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ethanol gel
Intradiscal injection of ethanol gel
Prednisolone acetate
Intradiscal infiltration of steroids
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 2-month refractory pain to conservative treatment, non-surgical patients;
* Chronic discogenic pain (1 or 2 lumbar discs) with concordant MR imaging;
* Symptomatic for at least 8 weeks despite appropriate medical treatment;
* Patient who agrees to participate in the study and who signed the informed consent form;
* Patient with social protection.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient with pure radicular pain;
* Sick leave of more than 12 months secondary to the symptoms;
* Patients who cannot read or write French;
* History of cognitive-behavioral disorders that could interact with assessment by self-questionnaire;
* Local or general infection, or suspicion of infection;
* Severe coagulation disorders;
* Other rheumatic inflammatory disease;
* Undercurrent serious pathology with life expectancy \< 2 years;
* Female of childbearing age that are known to be pregnant during inclusion visit or wishing to become pregnant before treatment;
* Subject who has forfeited their freedom by administrative or legal award, or is under guardianship or under limited judicial protection
* Patient participating in another interventional clinical trial or testing an experimental drug within 30 days of inclusion in the study.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
CEISO
INDUSTRY
Gelscom SAS
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mathieu de Sèze, Dr
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
CHU Bordeaux Pellegrin
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Pellegrin
Bordeaux, , France
Hospital St-Dié-des-Vosges
Saint-Dié, , France
Hospital SUD La Reunion
Saint-Pierre, , France
Hospital St-Etienne
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, , France
Hospital Valence
Valence, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Mathieu de Sèze, Pr.
Role: primary
Romain Kohlmann, Dr.
Role: primary
Sylvain Grange, Dr.
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2017-A03259-44
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.