Post Market Non-Inferiority Study Comparing Triojection® to Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation

NCT ID: NCT02525120

Last Updated: 2018-06-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

49 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-07-31

Study Completion Date

2020-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of this study is to compare the early clinical outcomes following non-surgical treatment with Triojection® to surgical discectomy. Early is defined as less than or equal to 6 months.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The objective of this study is to compare clinical, economic and safety outcomes between Triojection and surgical discectomy. The study will include two follow-up phases: 1) an initial follow-up period during the first 6 months after treatment and (2) a long-term follow-up lasting an additional 18 months (2 years total).

The hypothesis is that over the first six months after treatment, Triojection® will be non-inferior to discectomy with respect to the improvement in leg pain. This will be demonstrated using a non-inferiority margin of 19.4 points on the difference between baseline leg pain score and the average leg pain score recorded at 1 week, 1, 3 and 6 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lumbar Disc Herniation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Triojection System for ozone injection

Triojection is a system including a single-use sterile syringe cartridge and an accessory console. The console is interfaced to a supply of medical oxygen and uses this supply to fill the syringe with oxygen. Ozone is produced by applying a high voltage to electrodes physically located within the syringe. When a concentration of 35µg/ml is reached, the cartridge is removed from the console. The sterile syringe, containing the gas, is extracted from the protective housing and the gas is administered directly to the center of the herniated disc through a spinal needle.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Triojection

Intervention Type DEVICE

Triojection is system intended to deliver a specific amount of ozone to a herniated disc.

Surgical discectomy

The surgical group will be receive a standard surgical discectomy to remove the herniated disc material.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Surgical discectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients will receive surgery to remove the herniated disc material.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Triojection

Triojection is system intended to deliver a specific amount of ozone to a herniated disc.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Surgical discectomy

Patients will receive surgery to remove the herniated disc material.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient is willing to provide informed consent.
2. Clinical and radiographic evidence of one, and only one, symptomatic protruding or extruded disc between L1 and S1.
3. The herniated disc should have a disc height of at least 50% that of the normal adjacent disc levels, as determined by the investigator.
4. The signal intensity of the herniated disc material should be equal or greater than the nucleus pulposus of the herniated disc.
5. The patient must have pain in a dermatomal distribution consistent with their radiographic findings
6. Leg pain greater than or equal to 5 on the NRS scale
7. Symptoms for at least 6 weeks
8. Willingness to complete all follow-up evaluations
9. Patient aged 18-65 years
10. BMI\<40

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with a disc herniation extending past the facet joint
2. Presence of a non-contiguous disc fragment
3. Impairment of bladder/bowel function or motor impairment in the affected leg
4. An epidural steroid injection in the past 2 weeks
5. Previous discectomy, arthroplasty or fusion at any lumbar level
6. In patients with L5-S1 disc herniation, a congenital condition where the L5 vertebral body is either fused to the sacrum or the L5-S1 disc is not fully formed as a normal adult disc.
7. Symptomatic lumbar stenosis or listhesis
8. Symptomatic sacroiliac joint
9. Symptomatic foraminal stenosis due to severe degenerative disc disease
10. History of spinal tumor, fracture or infection
11. Females of childbearing age that are known to be pregnant or wishing to become pregnant during the study
12. Fibromyalgia
13. Active infection
14. Metastatic cancer within the past 5 years
15. Pending litigation against a health care provider
16. More than 3 months of continuous sick leave prior to enrollment.
17. Known drug or alcohol abuse
18. Diagnosed psychiatric disease or psychological distress caused by recent trauma like divorce, death of a member family or loss of a job
19. Patient known to be affected by favism (G6PD deficiency)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

genae international,ag

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Minimus Spine, Inc

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Josip Buric, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Centro Chirurgico San Paolo, Pistoia, Italy

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University General Hospital Attikon

Athens, Haidari, Greece

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII

Bergamo, Lombardy, Italy

Site Status

Ospedale Regionale di Lugano- Civico e Italiano

Lugano, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Greece Italy Switzerland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1CP-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Treatment of Discogenic Back Pain
NCT02089139 TERMINATED NA