Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
5 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-03-15
2027-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study to Determine the Safety and Tolerability of TG-C in Subjects with Back Pain Due to Degenerative Disc Disease
NCT06144970
Treatment of Discogenic Back Pain
NCT02089139
Safety and Efficacy of the TransDiscal System Versus Medical Management in Treating Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain
NCT01263054
Placebo-controlled Trial of Transdiscal Radiofrequency Annuloplasty
NCT00750191
Value of Functional Anesthetic and Provocative Discography in the Surgical Treatment of Discogenic Pain
NCT01077947
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Investigate the safety and feasibility of the Discogen device to alleviate back/radicular leg pain
2. Assess the mean reduction in back and radicular leg pain following Discogen treatment.
* Primary Safety - collection of all adverse events, including any device- or procedure-related adverse events
* Primary Effectiveness -percent change from baseline for Numerical Pain Scale (NPS) radicular leg pain at 30 and 60 days. The scale ranges from 0(No pain) to 10 (Severe pain).
* Secondary Effectiveness:
* Change from baseline in Oswestry Disability Index at 30 and 60 days. The Index ranges from 0-20% (minimal disability), 21-40% (moderate disability), 41-60% (severe disability), 61-80% (crippled), to 81-100% (bed bound).
* Percent change from baseline NPS back pain at 30 and 60 days
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment Group
Study subjects in the treatment group (Arm 1) will receive 3 daily Discogen treatments unilaterally within a one week (M-M) period, each lasting 25 minutes.
Discogen Low pulsed ultrasound treatment
The device is a customized Low Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound (LIPUS) transducer system and power source. The transducer is biocompatible for skin contact. The system is capable of calibration to desired treatment parameters. The study subject will be placed in the prone position with all appropriate pressure points padded on the exam table. For the first treatment, fluoroscopic imaging (and/or ultrasonic guidance) will be used to guide the placement of the transducer over the anatomic target, unilateral at the L3-4, L4-5 or L5-S1 levels.
The skin of the study subject's back will be marked with non-washable marking pen to indicate the site for placing the transducer during the first treatment. The subsequent treatment (second and third) can be done without using ultrasound guidance. The transducer will be placed on the marked site during the second and third treatment.
The ultrasound signal will be delivered unilaterally for 25 minutes, using a timer visible to the patient. The power ge
Sham Control Group
Subjects in the sham control arm (Arm 2) will receive 3 daily non-powered treatments unilaterally within a one week (M-M) period, each lasting 25 minutes
Discogen Sham Treatment
The ultrasound signal will be delivered unilaterally for 25 minutes, using a timer visible to the patient. The power generator will not be turned on for the sham treatment, but the wave generator will be displayed. All study subjects will receive a total of three daily Discogen treatments over the span of a single M-M work week
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Discogen Low pulsed ultrasound treatment
The device is a customized Low Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound (LIPUS) transducer system and power source. The transducer is biocompatible for skin contact. The system is capable of calibration to desired treatment parameters. The study subject will be placed in the prone position with all appropriate pressure points padded on the exam table. For the first treatment, fluoroscopic imaging (and/or ultrasonic guidance) will be used to guide the placement of the transducer over the anatomic target, unilateral at the L3-4, L4-5 or L5-S1 levels.
The skin of the study subject's back will be marked with non-washable marking pen to indicate the site for placing the transducer during the first treatment. The subsequent treatment (second and third) can be done without using ultrasound guidance. The transducer will be placed on the marked site during the second and third treatment.
The ultrasound signal will be delivered unilaterally for 25 minutes, using a timer visible to the patient. The power ge
Discogen Sham Treatment
The ultrasound signal will be delivered unilaterally for 25 minutes, using a timer visible to the patient. The power generator will not be turned on for the sham treatment, but the wave generator will be displayed. All study subjects will receive a total of three daily Discogen treatments over the span of a single M-M work week
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Adult (\> 21 y.o.) males and females legally able and willing to participate and provide consent in the study and attend follow-up visits
2. Able and willing to complete study forms and communicate with the investigator
3. Presenting with unilateral radicular leg pain with or without axial back pain of \>1 month duration
4. No epidural injections at treatment site within the last three months
5. Leg NPS pain score of 4 - 9 in the last month (on a scale of 0 to 10)
6. Clinical presentation of sensory radiculopathy referable to single-level disc disease/herniation at L3-4, L4-5 or L5-S1
7. MRI lumbar spine negative for extruded disc herniation, tumor, or bleeding, but positive for disc disease/herniation at L3-4, L4-5 or L5-S1 with mild to moderate foraminal or spinal stenosis (less than 50%).
Exclusion Criteria
2. Younger than 21 or older than 75 years
3. Presenting with motor deficits
4. Presenting with a baseline Oswestry Disability Index ≥ 41% (severe disability or worse)
5. Presence of metal hardware within the lumbosacral spine
6. History of spine surgery at the level of treatment.
7. Lumbar spine pathology that may increase procedural risk and/or influence symptoms and/or generate unrelated adverse events (per the discretion of the study PI)
8. Severe lumbar central canal stenosis (greater than 50%)
9. Severe lumbar foraminal stenosis (greater than 50%)
10. Severe herniated lumbar disc 4(Grade 2 and above)
11. Lumbar instability on flexion/extension plain films, greater the Grade 1 spondylolisthesis
12. Unable to understand and complete research questionnaires
13. Any severe medical condition preventing the patient from safely and effectively being treated in the study or reporting study outcomes.
14. BMI greater than 30
15. Implanted spinal stimulators
16. Epidural injections at treatment site within the last three months
21 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Discogen
UNKNOWN
Columbia University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Clark Smith
Associate Professor of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Clark Smith, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Columbia University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Su ZH, Liu J, Yang MS, Chen ZY, You K, Shen J, Huang CJ, Zhao QH, Liu EQ, Zhao L, Feng QJ, Pang SM, Li SL, Lu H. Automatic Grading of Disc Herniation, Central Canal Stenosis and Nerve Roots Compression in Lumbar Magnetic Resonance Image Diagnosis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 6;13:890371. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.890371. eCollection 2022.
PASS 2021 Power Analysis and Sample Size Software (2021). NCSS, LLC. Kaysville, Utah, USA, ncss.com/software/pass.
Fiore P, Panza F, Cassatella G, Russo A, Frisardi V, Solfrizzi V, Ranieri M, Di Teo L, Santamato A. Short-term effects of high-intensity laser therapy versus ultrasound therapy in the treatment of low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011 Sep;47(3):367-73. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AAAU8219
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.