Trial to Show Non-inferiority / Superiority of an Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy to Standard Microdiscectomy

NCT ID: NCT01622413

Last Updated: 2017-09-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-09-30

Study Completion Date

2017-09-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study compares an endoscopic transforaminal surgical technique for the treatment of a herniated disc to the standard microsurgical procedure. Clinical parameters as well as health economy will be assessed.

The study hypothesis is that the endoscopic approach is equivalent or superior to microdiscectomy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lumbar Disc Herniation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Endscopy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

joimax TESSYS

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Transforaminal Endoscopic Surgery System

Microsurgery

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Microdiscectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard procedure for disc surgery

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

joimax TESSYS

Transforaminal Endoscopic Surgery System

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Microdiscectomy

Standard procedure for disc surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

TES TESS

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* symptomatic lumbar disc herniation
* clinical and radiological evidence of nerve root compression
* failure of conservative treatment for at least 6 weeks

Exclusion Criteria

* previous lumbar spine surgery
* severe or progressive motor deficit
* BMI \> 40
* cauda equina syndrome
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Joimax GmbH

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Carl H Fürstenberg, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Clinic Heidelberg, Department of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Paraplegiology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Clinic of Neurosurgery

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Ligamenta Spine Center

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

University Clinic Heidelberg, Department of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Paraplegiology

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011/001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id