RCT Study of the Gelstix™ Device to Treat Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain GelStix Study
NCT ID: NCT02763956
Last Updated: 2022-02-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
72 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-04-30
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Intervertebral DXM Gel Injection in Adults With Painful Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease
NCT04727385
Study Investigating STA363 Compared to Placebo in Patients With Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain
NCT04673461
Safety and Efficacy of the TransDiscal System Versus Medical Management in Treating Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain
NCT01263054
Regenexx™ PL-Disc Versus Steroid Epidurals for Lumbar Radiculopathy
NCT01850771
Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of the Artificial Cervical Disc - Low Profile Device at Two Adjacent Levels
NCT00637156
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of treatment with the GelStix™ device in a patient population that had no benefit from conservative care.
The primary objective of this study is to quantify the reduction in lumbar pain in a GelStix™ treatment group compared with a control group receiving a saline solution injection as placebo.
The secondary objectives are to assess:
* Disability, using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
* Quality of life (QoL), quantified with the European Quality of Life Five Dimension Five Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L).
* The Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale. This scale assesses the patient's own evaluation of improvement or deterioration over time on a 7-point Likert Scale rated from 'very much improved' to 'very much worse'.
* The use of pain medication
* The disc degeneration process will be assessed by means of MRI twelve months after treatment compared to baseline. Pfirrmann grade, disc height, and the presence of high intensity zones, Modic signs, and Schmorl's nodes will be recorded.
* The incidence and severity of complications and adverse events
The total expected number of patients to be randomized is 72. Taking into account a relevant difference of 1.5 between groups on the NRS, with an SD of 2, 30 patients per group (60 patients in total) will be required to detect a statistically significant difference with a power of 80% at an alpha of 5% (two-tailed) for unpaired Student's T test. Taking into account a 20% drop out rate, 72 patients are expected to be randomized for this study.
The estimated duration for the investigational plan (from start of screening of first participant to end of follow-up of last participant) is 24 months.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Gelstix
The intradiscal insertion of the GelStix™ Nucleus Augmentation Device.
GelStix™ Nucleus Augmentation Device
Intradiscal Gelstix insertion
Placebo
Intradiscal saline solution (1 mL NaCl 0.9%) injection.
Placebo
Intradiscal saline injection
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
GelStix™ Nucleus Augmentation Device
Intradiscal Gelstix insertion
Placebo
Intradiscal saline injection
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* failure to have symptoms resolved or reduced following at least 12 weeks of conservative care (pain medication and/or physical therapy)
* negative medial branches block results
* baseline Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score ≥5/10
Exclusion Criteria
* disc herniations
* annular tear (greater than Grade 4 Modified Dallas Grading)
* coagulopathy or oral anticoagulant therapy (except low-dose acetylsalicylic acid) in conditions that do not allow for a temporary discontinuation
* previous lumbar surgery
* disc height less than 5 mm at the treatment level or less than 50% the original height
* BMI (Body Mass Index (kg/m2) of ≥ 35
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rijnstate Ziekenhuis, Arnhem, The Netherlands
UNKNOWN
Paolo Maino, Sponsor-Investigator
UNKNOWN
Ospedale Regionale di Lugano
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Eva Koetsier MD PhD LLM
MD PhD LLM
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Eva Koetsier, MD PhD LLM
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centro Terapia del Dolore, EOC Lugano
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Rijnstate Ziekenhuis
Arnhem, , Netherlands
EOC Lugano
Lugano, Canton Ticino, Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Koetsier E, van Kuijk SMJ, Maino P, Dukanac J, Scascighini L, Cianfoni A, Scarone P, Kuhlen DE, Hollman MW, Kallewaard JW. Efficacy of the Gelstix nucleus augmentation device for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain: protocol for a randomised, sham-controlled, double-blind, multicentre trial. BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 30;12(3):e053772. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053772.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GelStix-SW/ NSI-TD-003
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.