REACH Implicit Bias Training Project

NCT ID: NCT03415308

Last Updated: 2024-03-18

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

114 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-04-18

Study Completion Date

2022-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The overall goal and theme of the Duke Center for Research to Advance Equity in Healthcare is to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in health through interventions that affect the clinical encounter. To achieve this goal, there is an urgent need for interventions that address implicit bias in healthcare. Implicit bias training is widely used to raise self-awareness and provide self-management tools. The overall objective is to test the hypothesis that implicit bias training for healthcare providers will reduce racial and ethnic disparities in patient- centered care. The proposed project will lay the groundwork for testing that hypothesis by using patient focus groups to garner a deeper understanding of perceptions of implicit bias in the clinical encounter; provider and health system stakeholder semi-structured interviews to inform refinement of the existing implicit bias training at Duke; and perform a pilot study of implicit bias training for providers. At the conclusion of this study, the investigators will have the necessary preliminary data to propose a definitive trial to determine the impact of an implicit bias training intervention for providers on racial and ethnic disparities in patient-centered care. This research will ultimately lead to the delivery of equitable, evidence-based, patient-centered care for all.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Despite substantial improvements in the overall health of our nation, racial and ethnic disparities in health and healthcare remain ubiquitous. Disparities are apparent after controlling for access to care, insurance, income, patient preferences, and clinical need, suggesting that providers and health systems are important contributors to racial disparities in healthcare. In its landmark report, "Unequal Treatment," the Institute of Medicine concluded that providers contribute to disparities through the effects of implicit bias. Implicit bias occurs when thoughts and feelings outside of conscious awareness and control affect judgment and/or behavior. It is closely related to stereotyping, but not necessarily associated with explicit bias (i.e., prejudice). It leads to involuntary "blind spots" in virtually all of us. Implicit racial bias in providers is associated with Blacks (compared to Whites) experiencing lower patient-centered communication, worse doctor-patient relationships, lower confidence in the doctor, and poorer health outcomes. Therefore, to address health disparities, there is an urgent need for interventions that address implicit bias in healthcare.

Across society, implicit bias training is increasingly used in public service, business and healthcare settings to raise self-awareness and provide self-management tools for avoiding actions based on implicit bias. While such interventions are well-conceived and intuitively attractive, they have not been rigorously tested. In order to make optimal use and insure sustained support for such training, its effectiveness must be rigorously demonstrated. The overall objective is to test the hypothesis that implicit bias training for healthcare providers will reduce racial/ethnic disparities in patient-centered care. Before investigators can definitively test this hypothesis, additional groundwork must be done.

This project will provide the preliminary evidence necessary to ultimately evaluate an implicit bias training intervention in a pragmatic, randomized clinical trial conducted at the health system level. To do so, investigators will achieve these specific aims:

Aim 1. Identify patient preferences for constructs, and related outcomes, that reflect the expression of implicit bias in clinical encounters. Investigators will use qualitative methods to gather data on the elements associated with the patient perception of implicit bias (e.g. communication, respect, patient-centeredness) to ensure that our selected outcomes reflect the breadth of patients' concerns.

Aim 2. Refine an existing implicit bias intervention with input from providers, health system stakeholders and expert consultation. Investigators will conduct a series of semi-structured interviews to gather insights from stakeholders regarding how to best refine the design of our existing implicit bias intervention to ensure that we have addressed potential facilitators and barriers to uptake, use, and sustainability.

Aim 3. In a pilot trial, determine the feasibility of delivering the refined implicit bias reduction intervention and assessing patient centered outcomes. Investigators will conduct a feasibility trial using the refined intervention emerging from Aim 2. These feasibility outcomes will prepare investigators for a future, fully-powered randomized trial of implicit bias training.

At the conclusion of this study, investigators will be prepared to test the impact of implicit bias training on racial/ethnic disparities in the clinical encounter, and thus move us toward delivery of equitable, evidence-based, patient- centered clinical care.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Communication Bias, Racial Relation, Doctor Patient

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

OTHER

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patient Focus Groups

Identify patient preferences for constructs, and related outcomes, that reflect the expression of implicit bias in clinical encounters. I

Focus Groups

Intervention Type OTHER

Investigators will use qualitative methods to gather data on the elements associated with the patient perception of implicit bias (e.g. communication, respect, patient-centeredness) to ensure that our selected outcomes reflect the breadth of patients' concerns.

Stakeholders Cognitive Interviews

Investigators will conduct a series of semi-structured interviews.

Cognitive Interviews

Intervention Type OTHER

To gather insights from stakeholders regarding how to best refine the design of our existing implicit bias intervention to ensure that we have addressed potential facilitators and barriers to uptake, use, and sustainability

Pilot Testing of Implicit Bias Training

Refined intervention emerging from Aim 2. T

Pilot Testing of Implicit Bias Training

Intervention Type OTHER

Determine the feasibility of delivering the refined implicit bias reduction intervention and assessing patient centered outcomes by giving providers a refined implicit bias training.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Focus Groups

Investigators will use qualitative methods to gather data on the elements associated with the patient perception of implicit bias (e.g. communication, respect, patient-centeredness) to ensure that our selected outcomes reflect the breadth of patients' concerns.

Intervention Type OTHER

Cognitive Interviews

To gather insights from stakeholders regarding how to best refine the design of our existing implicit bias intervention to ensure that we have addressed potential facilitators and barriers to uptake, use, and sustainability

Intervention Type OTHER

Pilot Testing of Implicit Bias Training

Determine the feasibility of delivering the refined implicit bias reduction intervention and assessing patient centered outcomes by giving providers a refined implicit bias training.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Aim 1:

* Had at least 2 non-urgent ambulatory care visits any Healthcare facility in the past year (via self-report)
* Proficient in English

Aim 2:

* Providers from Durham-based ambulatory clinics in the Duke Health System or Stakeholder

Aim 3:

* Providers from the Duke Health System providing care to a continuity patient panel.

Exclusion Criteria

Aim 1:

* Less than 2 non-urgent visits
* Patient not identifying as black, white or Hispanic
* Non-English speaking

Aim 2:

* Not a Duke provider or stakeholder

Aim 3:

* Not a Duke Health system provider/affiliated provider
* Does not provide clinical care at a Duke affiliated facility
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Duke University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gary G Bennett, Ph.D

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Duke University

Kimberly S Johnson, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Duke University

Laura P Svetkey, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Duke University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Duke University

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Svetkey LP, Bennett GG, Reese B, Corsino L, Pinheiro SO, Fischer JE, Seidenstein J, Olsen MK, Brown T, Ezem N, Liu E, Majors A, Steinhauser KE, Sullivan BH, van Ryn M, Wilson SM, Yang H, Johnson KS. Design and pilot test of an implicit bias mitigation curriculum for clinicians. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jun 6;11:1316475. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1316475. eCollection 2024.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38903809 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pro00088354

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Message Testing for CKD
NCT05462158 COMPLETED NA
CKD Report Card Pilot Trial
NCT04119570 COMPLETED NA