Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
66 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-02-01
2018-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pain Palliation in Forearm Fractures in the Emergency Department
NCT06588907
Hematoma Block as an Adjunct to Procedural Sedation for Forearm Fracture Reduction
NCT00763880
The Effect of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Fracture Mandibular Surgeries
NCT06167187
Morphine and/or Nalbuphine as Adjuvants in Ultrasound Guided Interscalene Block: for Shoulder Surgeries
NCT03034382
Ultrasound-Guided Infraclvicular Block Using Dexmedetomidine Versus Nalbuphine as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine in Upper Limb Orthopedic Surgery
NCT07279727
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The characteristic features of ideal analgesia during reduction are determined by safety, simplicity, affectivity and costs. Giventhe logistic difficulty of providing such anesthesia to such large number of patients simpler alternatives to conventional anesthesia have been tried. Hematoma Block alone, Hematoma Block with sedation, Bier's Block (Intravenous regional anesthesia), regional nerve blocks, sedation have been compared to general anesthesia to evaluate the efficacy, effectiveness, safety in treating such patients
Amongst various techniques, HB and IVRA are attractive options. However, while HB has been demonstrated to be safe simple and has been used effectively for treatment of radius fractures in ER and for immediate pain relief it doesn't provide muscular relaxation and may not be sufficient for any operative intervention
IVRA is suitable for operations of the distal extremities, in situations where it is safe and easy to apply an occlusive tourniquet. The primary advantages of IVRA are its simplicity, reliability, and cost-effectiveness. . It is a regional anesthetic technique that is easy to perform, with success rates varying between 94% and 98%.For these reasons, it remains a popular choice among anesthesiologists.
A combination of blocks is usually done to overcome the deficiencies of individual blocks and to improve operating conditions or to prolong post operative analgesia. However the use of dual technique of IVRA and HB with local anesthetic only offered near absence of post operative analgesia
Lidocaine is the most frequently used LA for IVRA and HB
Different agents have been used as additive to local anesthetic for IVRA including phencyclidines, non-steroidal anti inflammatory drugs, opioids, and muscle relaxants. Ketamine is an effective anesthetic agent for IVRA at concentrations between 0.3% and 0.5%.it improves quality of anesthesia and peri operative analgesia without causing side effects
Ketamine, a phenyl-piper dine derivative, was first synthesized in the early 1960 as an IV anesthetic agent. At sub anesthetic doses, ketamine exerts a noncompetitive blockade of N -methyl aspartate (NMDA) receptors. NMDA receptors play a major role in synaptic plasticity and are specifically implicated in central nervous system facilitation of pain processing. NMDA receptor antagonists have been implicated in perioperative pain management. Ketamine also has local anesthetic qualities, which have been studied as a sole agent for IVRA. In addition to spinal cord NMDA receptors, NMDA receptors have also been identified on peripheral unmyelinated sensory axons. This can explain why ketamine as an NMDA receptor antagonist was able to attenuate the tourniquet pain.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ketamine in hematoma block
Ketamine used in hematoma block
ketamine in hematoma block
ketamine used in local hematoma block only
ketamine intravenous anesthesia
ketamine used in local intravenous anesthesia
ketamine in local intravenous anesthesia
ketamine will be used with lidocaine in local intravenous anesthesia
lidocaine intravenous anesthesia
2.5 mg/kg of lidocaine 2% diluted with saline to a total volume of 40 ml.
Lidocaine Hydrochloride
2.5 mg/kg of lidocaine 2% in intravenous regional anesthesia
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ketamine in hematoma block
ketamine used in local hematoma block only
ketamine in local intravenous anesthesia
ketamine will be used with lidocaine in local intravenous anesthesia
Lidocaine Hydrochloride
2.5 mg/kg of lidocaine 2% in intravenous regional anesthesia
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II.
* Patients scheduled for closed fracture of distal upper extremity within 7 days, requiring open or closed reduction and internal fixation.
* Patients scheduled for procedure lasting less than 90 minutes.
Exclusion Criteria
* Compound or contaminated fracture.
* Peripheral vascular disease, sickle cell disease or coagulation disorders.
* Allergy to the local anesthetics or to the drugs used in the study.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mohammed mamdouh mohammed mahmoud
Dr
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University
Asyut, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB17100203
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.