Pain Alleviation of Forearm Fractures

NCT ID: NCT03377907

Last Updated: 2019-02-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

66 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-02-01

Study Completion Date

2018-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

fractures of upper limb induce much pain . A lot of modalities are available to alleviate pain. fracture hematoma block, and intravenous regional anesthesia seem to be cost effective and attractive options

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Fractures of the forearm are extremely common, Pain relief is of utmost importance in forearm fractures which may need manipulation immediately for reduction followed by operative intervention

The characteristic features of ideal analgesia during reduction are determined by safety, simplicity, affectivity and costs. Giventhe logistic difficulty of providing such anesthesia to such large number of patients simpler alternatives to conventional anesthesia have been tried. Hematoma Block alone, Hematoma Block with sedation, Bier's Block (Intravenous regional anesthesia), regional nerve blocks, sedation have been compared to general anesthesia to evaluate the efficacy, effectiveness, safety in treating such patients

Amongst various techniques, HB and IVRA are attractive options. However, while HB has been demonstrated to be safe simple and has been used effectively for treatment of radius fractures in ER and for immediate pain relief it doesn't provide muscular relaxation and may not be sufficient for any operative intervention

IVRA is suitable for operations of the distal extremities, in situations where it is safe and easy to apply an occlusive tourniquet. The primary advantages of IVRA are its simplicity, reliability, and cost-effectiveness. . It is a regional anesthetic technique that is easy to perform, with success rates varying between 94% and 98%.For these reasons, it remains a popular choice among anesthesiologists.

A combination of blocks is usually done to overcome the deficiencies of individual blocks and to improve operating conditions or to prolong post operative analgesia. However the use of dual technique of IVRA and HB with local anesthetic only offered near absence of post operative analgesia

Lidocaine is the most frequently used LA for IVRA and HB

Different agents have been used as additive to local anesthetic for IVRA including phencyclidines, non-steroidal anti inflammatory drugs, opioids, and muscle relaxants. Ketamine is an effective anesthetic agent for IVRA at concentrations between 0.3% and 0.5%.it improves quality of anesthesia and peri operative analgesia without causing side effects

Ketamine, a phenyl-piper dine derivative, was first synthesized in the early 1960 as an IV anesthetic agent. At sub anesthetic doses, ketamine exerts a noncompetitive blockade of N -methyl aspartate (NMDA) receptors. NMDA receptors play a major role in synaptic plasticity and are specifically implicated in central nervous system facilitation of pain processing. NMDA receptor antagonists have been implicated in perioperative pain management. Ketamine also has local anesthetic qualities, which have been studied as a sole agent for IVRA. In addition to spinal cord NMDA receptors, NMDA receptors have also been identified on peripheral unmyelinated sensory axons. This can explain why ketamine as an NMDA receptor antagonist was able to attenuate the tourniquet pain.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Forearm Fracture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ketamine in hematoma block

Ketamine used in hematoma block

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ketamine in hematoma block

Intervention Type DRUG

ketamine used in local hematoma block only

ketamine intravenous anesthesia

ketamine used in local intravenous anesthesia

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ketamine in local intravenous anesthesia

Intervention Type DRUG

ketamine will be used with lidocaine in local intravenous anesthesia

lidocaine intravenous anesthesia

2.5 mg/kg of lidocaine 2% diluted with saline to a total volume of 40 ml.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lidocaine Hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

2.5 mg/kg of lidocaine 2% in intravenous regional anesthesia

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ketamine in hematoma block

ketamine used in local hematoma block only

Intervention Type DRUG

ketamine in local intravenous anesthesia

ketamine will be used with lidocaine in local intravenous anesthesia

Intervention Type DRUG

Lidocaine Hydrochloride

2.5 mg/kg of lidocaine 2% in intravenous regional anesthesia

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients aged more than 18 years old.
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II.
* Patients scheduled for closed fracture of distal upper extremity within 7 days, requiring open or closed reduction and internal fixation.
* Patients scheduled for procedure lasting less than 90 minutes.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients having cardiovascular co-morbidities.
* Compound or contaminated fracture.
* Peripheral vascular disease, sickle cell disease or coagulation disorders.
* Allergy to the local anesthetics or to the drugs used in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohammed mamdouh mohammed mahmoud

Dr

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University

Asyut, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB17100203

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.