Optimization of Analgesia for Hip Fracture Patients

NCT ID: NCT03609645

Last Updated: 2019-03-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-02-19

Study Completion Date

2020-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hip Fracture is a common orthopedic emergency in elderly people, which causes moderate to severe pain. Until now, different methods of pain treatment have been used, including pain-killer medication, which given in to the vein, and a nerve block.. A nerve block is the defined as injection of a freezing/numbing medication (local anesthetic) around the nerve area in order to stop pain.

Painkiller medications by themselves are not enough to stop pain, especially the pain that start with movement.

At the Toronto Western hospital, patients with hip fracture will generally receive a fascia iliac block (FIB) within 24 hours of hospital admission as a standard of care.

Fascia iliaca block is a nerve block done by injecting local anestheticat the level of the groin. This done to provide pain relief and is done either in the emergency room or in the inpatient area.

Studies have shown that nerves supplying other areas in the hip may be blocked to relive hip pain fracture.

Additional to this method, there is a newer type of nerve block, called the femoral articular branch block (FAB) that aim to block the nerves supplying the hip joint.

This new block has been described based on better understanding of the anatomy of the nerves that control hip pain. This block consists on an injection in the groin at a similar location as the Fascia iliaca block except that the needle has to go slightly deeper (by a few centimeters) to reach a better target.

Based on the current understanding on anatomy it is possible that this new technique may provide better pain control than a Fascia Iliaca Block.

The purpose of the study is to investigate the degree of pain relief achieved by the two different nerve block techniques: 1) Fascia iliaca block (FIB) and 2) Femoral and AON articular branches block (FAB).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The anterior hip joint is innervated by articular branches from the femoral nerve (FN), the obturator nerve (ON) and the accessory obturator nerve (AON). The posterior and inferior parts of the hip joint capsule are innervated by the sacral plexus via a) the sciatic nerve, b) the sciatic branch to the quadratus femoris muscle and c) the superior gluteal nerves. Gerhardt et al showed that nociceptive fibers are predominantly present in the anterior and superolateral parts of the joint capsule, suggesting that the femoral and obturator nerves should be the most important nerves to target for hip analgesia.

The 3-in-1 block and FIB are currently used to provide hip analgesia. However, recent MRI imaging studies have shown that proximal local anesthetic spread was not consistent following a 3-in-1 block and did not consistently cover the obturator nerve. Similar findings were reported for the FIB.

A recent study on the innervation of the anterior hip revealed the relevant landmarks for the articular branches of the FN, AON and ON. This study found that high branches of femoral nerve, which were given off superior to the inguinal ligament, play a greater role in the anterior hip innervation than previously reported. These high articular branches of the FN and AON are consistently found between anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) and iliopubic eminence (IPE). With the help of ultrasound imaging, these landmarks can be identifiable and it is possible to target them directly in order to provide hip analgesia.

These recent data suggests that blocking these branches as they course deep to the iliopsoas muscle should result in superior hip joint analgesia compared to a FIB since the local anesthetic spread from a FIB is neither proximal nor deep enough to cover these articular branches consistently. Real-time ultrasound can help identify these proximal FN and AON branches using the anterior inferior iliac spine and the iliopubic eminence as landmarks.

The overall aim of this study is to determine in a prospective, randomized, double blind manner, the analgesic profile associated with two different regional anesthetic techniques: (1) FIB and (2) Femoral articular branches (FAB) block.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hip Fractures

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This is a double-blinded randomized prospective study involving patients with hip fracture who are undergoing surgical fixation.
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
An unblinded study personnel not directly involved in patient care will prepare all study drugs. The anesthesiologist, patient, surgeon and the investigator collecting outcome data will be unaware of study group allocation.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Fascia iliaca block (FIB)

Group will receive Fascia iliaca block (FIB) with local anesthetic and femoral articular branch block (FAB) with normal saline (Placebo).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fascia iliaca block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

FIB Placebo Block: 20mL of Normal Saline Active drug: 20mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine with epinephrine (1:400, 000)

FAB block Placebo Block: 20mL of Normal Saline Active Drug: 20mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine with epinephrine (1:400,000)

Femoral articular branches block(FAB)

Group will receive Fascia iliaca block (FIB) with normal saline (Placebo) and Femoral AON articular branch block (FAB) with local anesthetic.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Femoral articular branches block(FAB)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

FIB Placebo Block: 20mL of Normal Saline Active drug: 20mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine with epinephrine (1:400, 000)

FAB block Placebo Block: 20mL of Normal Saline Active Drug: 20mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine with epinephrine (1:400,000)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fascia iliaca block

FIB Placebo Block: 20mL of Normal Saline Active drug: 20mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine with epinephrine (1:400, 000)

FAB block Placebo Block: 20mL of Normal Saline Active Drug: 20mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine with epinephrine (1:400,000)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Femoral articular branches block(FAB)

FIB Placebo Block: 20mL of Normal Saline Active drug: 20mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine with epinephrine (1:400, 000)

FAB block Placebo Block: 20mL of Normal Saline Active Drug: 20mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine with epinephrine (1:400,000)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA Physical Status I-III
* 60 years old or older
* BMI 18-40
* Scheduled for hip fracture surgical fixation

Exclusion Criteria

* Bilateral hip fracture
* Lack of mental ability to provide informed consent
* Pre-existing neuropathic pain or sensory disorders of the surgical limb
* Contraindication to regional anesthesia (Intolerance to the study drugs, bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy, malignancy or infection at the site of the block)
* Chronic opioid use defined as \>30 mg of daily oral morphine equivalents
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Health Network, Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Philip Peng, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Health Network-Toronto Western Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Toronto Western Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Rongyu Jin

Role: CONTACT

4166035800 ext. 2016

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Zhi-bin Wang

Role: primary

9052323369

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

17-6067

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.