Distal Nerve Blocks for Closed Reduction of Distal Forearm Fractures
NCT ID: NCT03376100
Last Updated: 2024-11-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
268 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-12-01
2024-05-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Brachial Plexus Nerve Block Versus Haematoma Block for Closed Reduction of Distal Radius Fracture in Adults - The BLOCK Trial. A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial.
NCT06678438
Ultrasound Guided Axillary Nerve Block Compared to Hematoma Block in Patients With Closed Reposition of Distal Forearm Fractures
NCT05674383
Nerve and Hematoma Blocks for Pain Relief During Distal Radius Fracture Reduction
NCT07183904
Ultrasound Guided Supracondylar Nerve Block & Hematoma Block for Closed Reduction of Distal End Radius Fractures
NCT05996315
Ultrasound Guided Hematoma Block in Distal Radius Fractures
NCT06193915
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Among all dislocated fractures of the distal forearm only the true Colles' fracture can potentially be treated adequately with a closed reduction and a cast, while the other fracture types are unstable by definition and require surgical stabilization. Most dislocated forearm fractures, however, require a primary reduction and this procedure requires the patient to be relieved of pain and the muscle traction on the fracture to be minimal. The conventional local anaesthetic procedure used in Denmark is the hematoma block where the local anaesthetic agent is injected directly in the fracture. This is done using either a blind technique or with the aid of X-ray to visualize the fracture line. The radial and median nerves supply periosteal innervation for the radius and the ulna as well as muscular innervation for the majority of muscles in the forearm and wrist. Blocking these nerves at the level of the cubital fossa should relieve pain and minimize muscular traction when performing closed reductions on distal forearm fractures.
The investigators hypothesize that ultrasound guided blocking of the radial and median nerves will improve fracture reduction satisfaction for the true Colles' fractures and improve analgesia for reduction of all fracture types compared to the standard haematoma block.
Patients eligible for screening for inclusion are identified in the Emergency Department (ED) at all recruitment sites upon primary contact. When an X-ray has revealed the relevant fracture, the ED-staff will call the available anaesthesiologist or anaesthesiologist trainee who will perform the inclusion process and randomisation. Participants will be randomized in either the intervention or the control group using the online randomization tool Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap, Aarhus University, Denmark). In both groups, the reduction process will begin 10 minutes after the block has been performed. The technique for the actual reduction may vary amongst physicians. To best reflect the clinical practices and to avoid the risk of an insufficient reduction due to the physician being forced to comply to a technique unfamiliar to him, no further standardisation will be made in this regard. Following casting of the fracture a control X-ray will be performed and subsequently evaluated independently by two skilled orthopaedic surgeons to establish if the reduction was satisfactory. In case of disputes a third orthopaedic surgeon will evaluate the X-ray and make a final ruling. The fracture will be deemed satisfactory using a binary outcome measure (yes/no) if all the following requirements set by the National Clinical Guideline for Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures are met.
Binary data, including primary endpoint will be analysed using chi squared test. For normally distributed measurements the differences between groups will be compared using Student´s t-test. Variables considered not to be normally distributed will be analysed by Mann-Whitney´s U-test. Two-tailed P-values \< 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control Group
Patients with distal forearm fractures randomized to Hematoma Block.
Hematoma Block
Conventional local anesthetic method using hematoma block
Intervention Group
Patients with distal forearm fractures randomized to Ultrasound guided nerve block
Ultrasound guided nerve blocks
Ultrasound guided nerve blocks of the radial and median nerves
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ultrasound guided nerve blocks
Ultrasound guided nerve blocks of the radial and median nerves
Hematoma Block
Conventional local anesthetic method using hematoma block
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age \> 18 years
* Legally competent
Exclusion Criteria
* Allergy or intolerance towards local anaesthetics
* Infection or burns at either injection site
* Multi trauma (defined as other fractures or significant injuries)
* Known pregnancy
* Participation in other studies
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aalborg University Hospital
OTHER
Randers Regional Hospital
OTHER
Herning Hospital
OTHER
Regionshospitalet Viborg, Skive
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Christoffer Grant Sølling
Consultant, Head of Research, MD, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Anette B Christensen, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dept. Anesthesiology-Intensive Care Medicine, Reional Hospital Viborg
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dept. Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Viborg Regional Hospital
Viborg, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
030021
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.