Nerve and Hematoma Blocks for Pain Relief During Distal Radius Fracture Reduction

NCT ID: NCT07183904

Last Updated: 2025-09-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

180 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-01

Study Completion Date

2025-03-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Distal radius fractures, commonly known as wrist fractures, are among the most frequent injuries seen in emergency departments. These injuries often require a closed reduction, a procedure in which the broken bone is manipulated back into place without surgery. One of the main challenges during this procedure is providing adequate pain control.

Traditionally, many hospitals use a "hematoma block," which means injecting a local anesthetic directly into the site of the fracture. This technique is simple and generally safe, but it does not always provide enough pain relief. Some patients continue to experience significant discomfort, especially in the fingers, during the traction and manipulation required to realign the bone.

Another option is to block the median nerve at the wrist. The median nerve supplies sensation to the thumb, index, and middle fingers. When combined with a hematoma block, this technique may improve digital pain relief during fracture reduction. However, this combined approach has not been well studied in Spain, and there is limited high-quality evidence worldwide.

The purpose of this study is to compare two methods of pain control during closed reduction of displaced distal radius fractures in adults: Hematoma block alone versus Hematoma block combined with median nerve block.

We hypothesize that the combined approach will reduce pain more effectively than the hematoma block alone.

The study is designed as a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial involving 112 adult patients treated at two hospitals in Madrid (Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre and Hospital Universitario de Getafe). Eligible participants are adults aged 18 to 100 years with an acute distal radius fracture (less than 48 hours old) requiring closed reduction. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups.

Pain will be assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at three key moments: during finger traction, during the reduction itself, and at hospital discharge (90-120 minutes after casting). Other information such as age, sex, fracture side, and prior use of pain or psychiatric medication will also be collected.

By answering whether the addition of a median nerve block improves pain control, this study could help establish a new protocol for managing distal radius fractures. If effective, this approach may lead to greater comfort for patients, higher satisfaction, and better overall outcomes in emergency care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Distal Radius Fracture Displaced Distal Radius Fracture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

* Two-arm design with participants randomized 1:1.
* One group receives hematoma block alone (control).
* The other group receives hematoma block combined with median nerve block (intervention).
* Randomization is stratified by study center (Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre and Hospital Universitario de Getafe) and balanced for sex, age, fracture side, and prior medication use.
* Each participant is assigned to only one study arm and followed prospectively.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hematoma Block

Participants will receive a hematoma block only. Under aseptic conditions, 5-10 mL of 2% mepivacaine will be injected directly into the fracture hematoma using a 25-27 gauge needle. No additional nerve block will be performed. This technique is currently the standard of care in the Emergency Department for closed reduction of displaced distal radius fractures.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hematoma Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Injection of 5-10 mL of 2% mepivacaine directly into the fracture hematoma under aseptic conditions.

Hematoma Block + Median Nerve Block

Participants will receive both a hematoma block and a median nerve block. Median nerve block will be administered at the wrist using anatomical landmarks: 3-5 mL of 2% mepivacaine injected between palmaris longus and flexor carpi radialis.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Hematoma Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Injection of 5-10 mL of 2% mepivacaine directly into the fracture hematoma under aseptic conditions.

Median Nerve Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Injection of 3-5 mL of 2% mepivacaine adjacent to the median nerve at the wrist, using anatomical landmarks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hematoma Block

Injection of 5-10 mL of 2% mepivacaine directly into the fracture hematoma under aseptic conditions.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Median Nerve Block

Injection of 3-5 mL of 2% mepivacaine adjacent to the median nerve at the wrist, using anatomical landmarks.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults aged 18 to 100 years.
* Diagnosis of acute displaced distal radius fracture (\< 48 hours since injury).
* Indication for closed reduction and immobilization.
* Ability to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Age under 18 years or open physes on plain radiograph.
* Open or pathological distal radius fractures.
* Local infection at or near the planned injection site.
* Significant neurological disease or cognitive impairment interfering with study participation.
* Presence of osteosynthesis material in the same segment of the affected limb.
* Known allergy or contraindication to local anesthetics used in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fundación para la Investigación Biomédica Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jose Antonio Guerrero Serrano

Dr. (Orthopaedic Surgeon)

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

12 de Octubre University Hospital

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

24/272

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.