How Point-of-Care Ultrasound Affects the Diagnostic Process in General Practice.

NCT ID: NCT03375333

Last Updated: 2019-07-05

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Total Enrollment: 579 participants
• Study Classification: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2018-01-15
• Study Completion Date: 2019-07-01

Brief Summary

This study explores how Point of Care Ultrasound (POC-US) is used in general practice in Denmark and how it affects the diagnostic process and treatment of patients.

Twenty general practitioners (GPs) will register information each time they use POC-US during a one month period. The information will include indications and frequencies of the performed POC-US examinations, change in tentative diagnosis, plan, and treatment before and after the use of POC-US in relation to confidence in the tentative diagnosis, findings and quality of the POC-US examination.

This is an observational study without any intervention.

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, observational study aiming to describe: How general practitioners use POC-US in their daily practice, how POC-US influences the diagnostic process, and how POC-US affects the treatment of the patients.

The Use of POC-US will be explored through indication, frequency, time consumption, modification, and findings in order to describe:

• Which organs the GPs scan, when using POC-US?
• Which tentative diagnoses entail the use of POC-US?
• If GPs intend to rule-in/rule-out or explore, when using POC-US?
• How often the GPs use POC-US?
• How often are the GPs able to produce POC-US pictures of relevant structures?
• How much time POC-US adds to the consultation?
• How often a difference in what the GP intends to scan and what POC-US is actually used for occurs (modification of the performed POC-US)?
• How often POC-US leads to a specific finding?

The influences of the diagnostic process will be explored through change in the tentative diagnosis and change in the GP's confidence in the tentative diagnosis. The aim is to describe:

• If POC-US changes the patient's tentative diagnosis
• If POC-US increases the GP's confidence in the tentative diagnosis
• The relationship between the GP's expression of confidence and change in the number of tentative diagnoses
• The relationship between change from symptom diagnoses to disease diagnoses and the GP's expression of confidence in the tentative diagnosis
• The relationship between specific organs scanned and the GP's expression of confidence in the tentative diagnosis

The effects on the treatment of patients will be explored through changes in the plan or treatment for the patient. The aim is to describe:

• If POC-US changes the GP's plan for the patient
• If POC-US changes the treatment for the patient
• The relationship between findings and change in the plan or treatment for the patient.

Study setting:

The study will take place in 20 different general practices in Denmark where the GPs use POC-US.

Interventions

There is no intervention in this study since the GPs are already using POC-US in their examination of patients.

Sample size

There are around 75 GPs in Denmark, who use POC-US. Of those 20 GPs will be included in this study.

It is estimated that the GPs will use POC-US 2-3 times a day, and assuming a participation rate of 80%, there will be 640-960 US scan during the study period of one month.

Recruitment

Participating GPs:

GPs using POC-US will be recruited through the continuous medical educations small-groups program, US networks, conferences, through teaching sessions, and through contacts via the Danish general practice research units. Interested GPs will be asked to register and answer a questionnaire including background information concerning demography,education and use of ultrasound. The participating GPs will be selected randomly among these registrations after considering in-and exclusion criteria.

Participating patients:

Each time the participating GP use POC-US, he/she will ask the patient for informed consent. No restrictions are made regarding age or gender.

Base-line assessment of GPs

The GPs' technical skills will be evaluated at baseline using a standardized protocol (OSAUS).

Data collection

The registration tool will be developed as a questionnaire to be used before and after the GP uses POC-US in the consultation. The questionnaire will include a time log to ensure the before and after registration. Several pilot tests will be performed both in the research group and with GPs using POC-US in order to ensure comprehension, feasibility and compliance.

The GPs will be asked to access a questionnaire in the online database SurveyXact each time they use their ultrasound device during their daily work. The GPs can access the questionnaire on their mobile phone, iPad or computer, using a unique link (respondent link) allocated each participating GP. A key file, connecting each participating GP with the respondent link in Surveyxact (link), will be safely stored at the Research Unit for General Practice in Aalborg.

The GPs will give each patient a unique ID-number A Key file connecting this ID-number and the patients CPR-number (Danish national social security number) will be safely stored at the GP's clinic.

Before questions:

• GP ID number
• Patient ID number
• Date
• Patient gender
• Patient Age
• What is the main reason to use POC-US in this patient? (Rule-in/Rule-out or Explore)
• Which organs/positions is expected to be scanned? (organs on list)
• What is the main tentative diagnosis for this patient? (ICPC2 codes)
• Are there any other possible tentative diagnoses in this case? (ICPC2 codes)
• What is the overall plan for this patient? (Acute admission to hospital, Subacute referral to hospital, Elective referral hospital, Subacute referral to specialist, Elective referral to specialist, Referral to radiology, Other referral e.g. physiotherapist, Follow-up in the clinic, No plan for follow-up, Other)
• Which treatment will be initiated at this stage? (medical treatment, referral for treatment, initiated other treatment, None, Other)

After questions:

• time used on the POC-US examination? (minutes)
• Which organs/positions were scanned? (organs on list)
• Was the GP able to produce ultrasound images of the relevant structures of (inserted text) ? (yes, no - please specify)
• What did the GP find? (Certain positive findings, Uncertain positive findings, Certain negative findings, Uncertain negative findings, Incidental findings - please specify in free text)
• Before POC-US the following tentative diagnoses were registered (inserted text) Has this changed? (yes but the ICPC2 code is unchanged, Yes both diagnosis and ICPC2 code have changed, no)
• What is the tentative diagnosis for this patient now? (ICPC2 codes)
• Are there any other possible tentative diagnoses for this patient (please specify)? (ICPC2 codes)
• How is the GPs confidence in their main tentative diagnosis, after POC-US? (Highly increased confidence, More confident, unchanged confidence, Less confident, Highly reduced confidence)
• Before POC-US the following plan was registered (inserted text) for the patient. Has this plan changed? (yes, no)
• What is the overall plan for this patient, now? (Acute admission to hospital, Subacute referral to hospital, Elective referral hospital, Subacute referral to specialist, Elective referral to specialist, Referral to radiology, Other referral e.g. physiotherapist, Follow-up in the clinic, No plan for follow-up, Other)
• Before POC-US the following treatment was registered (inserted text) for the patient. Has the treatment changed? (yes, no)
• Which treatment will be initiated at this stage? (medical treatment, referral for treatment, initiated other treatment, None, Other)

Patient experience:

After the consultation, patients will be asked to complete a questionnaire about their experience with POC-US in the consultation. (This questionnaire will be described in detail in a separate protocol).

Follow-up

The GPs will be asked to save patient information on the included patients (Key file) in order to identify the patient for an additional follow-up after six months (described in a separate protocol).

Statistics

Descriptive statistics will be used. A prospective statistical analysis plan will be uploaded to clinical trials before datacollection begins.

Research ethics approval

The study is approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency and the Committee of Multipractice Studies in General Practice.

Since the study is an observational study and does not include any intervention, approval by the Danish National Committee on Health Research Ethics have been exempted.

Protocol amendments

Will be declared and all editions and changes of the protocol will be saved.

For further information a full protocol is uploaded to clinical trials.

Conditions

Ultrasound; Diagnostics; General Practice

Study Design

• Observational Model Type: COHORT
• Study Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

20GPs

20 general practitioners, who use ultrasound in the examination of patients.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

1. Broad use of ultrasound

2. Working week of minimum four days

3. A minimum of 1400 patients listed

4. A minimum of two scanning probes

5. Previous participation in formal education in the use of ultrasound

6. Minimum six months experience with ultrasound in general practice.

7. Estimated use of ultrasound on a daily basis (average)

Exclusion Criteria

1. Ultrasound device more than 10 years old

2. Conflict of interest, e.g. if the GP is part of the research group or if the GP has direct financial interest in selling US devices.

3. If less than five patients have been enrolled.

All patients who consult the participating GP for conditions relevant for a POC-US examination will be offered to participate in the study. Patients are excluded if they do not wish to participate or if they are not able to give an informed consent.

• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Sponsors

Aalborg University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Camilla Aakjær Andersen

MD

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Martin Bach Jensen, Professor, GP, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Aalborg University

Locations

Research unit for general practice in Aalborg,department of clinical medicine Aalborg university

Aalborg, , Denmark

Countries

Denmark

References

Andersen CA, Brodersen JB, Mainz J, Thomsen JL, Graumann O, Lokkegaard T, Jensen MB. Does point-of-care ultrasound examination by the general practitioner lead to inappropriate care? A follow-up study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2025 Sep;43(3):613-625. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2025.2487095. Epub 2025 Apr 10.

Reference Type: DERIVED

PMID: 40207775 (View on PubMed)

Aakjaer Andersen C, Brodersen J, Davidsen AS, Graumann O, Jensen MBB. Use and impact of point-of-care ultrasonography in general practice: a prospective observational study. BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 17;10(9):e037664. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037664.

Reference Type: DERIVED

PMID: 32948563 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

RUGPAalborg GULD projektet

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id