Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for Diagnosis and Treatment of Fractures in the Costal Cartilage
NCT ID: NCT07338617
Last Updated: 2026-01-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2026-01-31
2028-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Does using both ultrasound and CT scans find more costal cartilage fractures than CT scans alone?
* Does discovering costal cartilage fractures change how patients are treated, such as whether more patients receive surgery or if different fractures are repaired?
* How do costal cartilage fractures heal, and do they affect lung function, pain, or the risk of complications after surgery?
Patients with cartilage injuries will be followed up at 1, 3, and 12 months after their injury. They will be checked for pain, instability, and healing using ultrasound and sometimes CT scans. The study will also assess lung function, quality of life, and pain levels.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ultrasound for Diagnosing Costochondral Joint Separation
NCT06766721
Pocket Sized Ultrasound (PsUS) and Pediatric Elbow Fractures
NCT05870345
Effects of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Multidisciplinary Medical Wards
NCT06529315
Bedside Ultrasound in Detection of Pneumothorax Post Transthoracic Lung Biopsy
NCT03397290
Point-of-Care Ultrasound (PoCUS) Low-Contact Curriculum Using Near-Peer Training and Remote Supervision
NCT06777641
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Computed tomography (CT) is the best radiological method for diagnosing rib fractures. CT with 3D reconstructions is also a valuable preoperative mapping tool for patients who are to undergo stabilizing surgery for rib fractures. However, CT is not as sensitive for fractures in the rib cartilage, which can therefore be missed. Ultrasound has proven to be more sensitive than CT in identifying fractures in the rib cartilage.
It is unknown whether point of care ultrasound (POCUS) performed by surgeons can identify more cartilage fractures or if this affects the treatment strategy.
The purpose of this study is to investigate whether we can find more rib fractures using POCUS in combination with CT than with CT alone. We also want to study the natural course of rib cartilage fractures using POCUS, CT, and clinical examination. We will also examine whether POCUS changes our plan for treating the patients.
The project is designed as a prospective, comparative study to evaluate a standardized protocol for POCUS for identifying cartilage injuries and for assessing radiological healing of cartilage injuries.
Adult patients treated at the Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital with at least one rib fracture and/or sternum fracture will be asked to participate in the study until the predetermined number of 100 patients is reached.
CT scans of included patients will be reviewed by a radiologist for the presence and extent of fractures of the sternum, cartilage, and ribs, as well as the presence of pneumothorax and/or hemothorax, lung contusion, and lung laceration.
The surgeon reviews the patient's medical record to determine if the patient meets the inclusion criteria. The surgeon then performs POCUS and documents any cartilage injuries. Afterward, the surgeon assesses the CT scan. If the surgeon notes fractures during CT review or POCUS that were not described in the radiologist's report, the CT scan is re-reviewed by the radiologist. If the fractures cannot be found during the re-review, they are considered missed. The surgeon decides during CT review whether there is an indication for surgery according to current guidelines and documents which fractures are planned to be fixed. If cartilage injuries are detected by POCUS, an assessment is made to determine whether the cartilage fractures affect the indication for surgery and/or which fractures are planned to be fixed. During surgery, the injuries that are fixed are documented.
Injuries are graded according to the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), the presence of flail segment, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and New Injury Severity Score (NISS).
Demographic data on included patients are collected: age, sex, height, weight, BMI, smoking status, comorbidities (COPD, asthma, pulmonary emphysema, diabetes mellitus).
Patients with cartilage injuries are followed up at 1, 3, and 12 months after the trauma. The following data are collected at follow-up visits: clinical and radiological healing. Clinical healing means absence of tenderness or palpable and/or perceived instability over the fracture. CT and POCUS are performed after 3 months. If complete radiological healing of the chest wall is lacking, repeat CT and POCUS are performed after 12 months. Radiological healing means signs of healing on CT, divided into groups of complete healing, partial healing, and no healing according to the radiologist's assessment, as well as healing or no healing according to the surgeon's assessment during POCUS.
Other variables collected at follow-up visits are lung function measured by spirometry, quality of life estimated with EQ5D, pain estimated by opioid equivalent consumption, visual analogue scale (VAS), and a graphical representation.
The natural course of fractures in the rib cartilage is incompletely explored. Cartilage fractures can contribute to instability in the chest and are currently usually operated on with the same methods as fractures in the bone itself. Knowledge about healing time and the proportion of cartilage fractures that heal may affect the choice of treatment method and improve the patient's chance of recovery from the injuries.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Study group
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Erik Öberg Westin
Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Eva-Corina Caragounis, Ph. D., Ass. Prof.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Institution of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University. Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ziegler DW, Agarwal NN. The morbidity and mortality of rib fractures. J Trauma. 1994 Dec;37(6):975-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199412000-00018.
Sirmali M, Turut H, Topcu S, Gulhan E, Yazici U, Kaya S, Tastepe I. A comprehensive analysis of traumatic rib fractures: morbidity, mortality and management. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003 Jul;24(1):133-8. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(03)00256-2.
Ciraulo DL, Elliott D, Mitchell KA, Rodriguez A. Flail chest as a marker for significant injuries. J Am Coll Surg. 1994 May;178(5):466-70.
Tanaka H, Yukioka T, Yamaguti Y, Shimizu S, Goto H, Matsuda H, Shimazaki S. Surgical stabilization of internal pneumatic stabilization? A prospective randomized study of management of severe flail chest patients. J Trauma. 2002 Apr;52(4):727-32; discussion 732. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200204000-00020.
Granetzny A, Abd El-Aal M, Emam E, Shalaby A, Boseila A. Surgical versus conservative treatment of flail chest. Evaluation of the pulmonary status. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2005 Dec;4(6):583-7. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2005.111807. Epub 2005 Sep 15.
Marasco SF, Davies AR, Cooper J, Varma D, Bennett V, Nevill R, Lee G, Bailey M, Fitzgerald M. Prospective randomized controlled trial of operative rib fixation in traumatic flail chest. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 May;216(5):924-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.12.024. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
Liu T, Liu P, Chen J, Xie J, Yang F, Liao Y. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Surgical Rib Fixation in Polytrauma Patients With Flail Chest. J Surg Res. 2019 Oct;242:223-230. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 May 14.
Bottlang M, Long WB, Phelan D, Fielder D, Madey SM. Surgical stabilization of flail chest injuries with MatrixRIB implants: a prospective observational study. Injury. 2013 Feb;44(2):232-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.011. Epub 2012 Aug 19.
Granhed HP, Pazooki D. A feasibility study of 60 consecutive patients operated for unstable thoracic cage. J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2014 Dec 30;8(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13032-014-0020-z. eCollection 2014.
Gasparri MG, Tisol WB, Haasler GB. Rib stabilization: lessons learned. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2010 Oct;36(5):435-40. doi: 10.1007/s00068-010-0048-3. Epub 2010 Sep 24.
Marasco S, Saxena P. Surgical rib fixation - technical aspects. Injury. 2015 May;46(5):929-32. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.12.021. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
Schulz-Drost S, Grupp S, Pachowsky M, Oppel P, Krinner S, Mauerer A, Hennig FF, Langenbach A. Stabilization of flail chest injuries: minimized approach techniques to treat the core of instability. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017 Apr;43(2):169-178. doi: 10.1007/s00068-016-0664-7. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
Bauman ZM, Beard R, Cemaj S. When less is more: A minimally invasive, intrathoracic approach to surgical stabilization of rib fractures. Trauma Case Rep. 2021 Mar 11;32:100452. doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2021.100452. eCollection 2021 Apr.
Pieracci FM, Johnson JL, Stovall RT, Jurkovich GJ. Completely thoracoscopic, intra-pleural reduction and fixation of severe rib fractures. Trauma Case Rep. 2015 Nov 4;1(5-8):39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2015.10.001. eCollection 2015 Oct. No abstract available.
Zhang J, Hong Q, Mo X, Ma C. Complete Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Rib Fractures: Series of 35 Cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Feb;113(2):452-458. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.01.065. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
Nowack T, Nonnemacher C, Christie DB. Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery as an Adjunct to Rib Fixation. Am Surg. 2022 Jun;88(6):1338-1340. doi: 10.1177/0003134820943642. Epub 2020 Aug 26. No abstract available.
Fraser SF, Tan C, Kuppusamy MK, Gukop P, Hunt IJ. The role of a video-assisted thoracic approach for rib fixation. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017 Apr;43(2):185-190. doi: 10.1007/s00068-016-0641-1. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
Xia H, Zhu P, Li J, Zhu D, Sun Z, Deng L, Zhang Y, Wang D. Thoracoscope combined with internal support system of chest wall in open reduction and internal fixation for multiple rib fractures. Exp Ther Med. 2018 Dec;16(6):4650-4654. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.6817. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
Oberg Westin E, Fagevik Olsen M, Ortenwall P, Caragounis EC. Retrospective comparison of operative technique for chest wall injuries. Injury. 2023 Mar 10:S0020-1383(23)00248-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.03.012. Online ahead of print.
Tay-Lasso E, Alaniz L, Grant W, Hovis G, Frank M, Kincaid C, Brynn S, Pieracci FM, Nahmias J, Barrios C, Rockne W, Chin T, Swentek L, Schubl SD. Prospective single-center paradigm shift of surgical stabilization of rib fractures with decreased length of stay and operative time with an intrathoracic approach. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023 Apr 1;94(4):567-572. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003811. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
Tichenor M, Reparaz LB, Watson C, Reeves J, Prest P, Fitzgerald M, Patel N, Tan X, Hessey J. Intrathoracic plates versus extrathoracic plates: a comparison of postoperative pain in surgical stabilization of rib fracture technique. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2023 Nov 3;8(1):e001201. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001201. eCollection 2023.
Marasco S, Liew S, Edwards E, Varma D, Summerhayes R. Analysis of bone healing in flail chest injury: do we need to fix both fractures per rib? J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Sep;77(3):452-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000375.
Pishbin E, Ahmadi K, Foogardi M, Salehi M, Seilanian Toosi F, Rahimi-Movaghar V. Comparison of ultrasonography and radiography in diagnosis of rib fractures. Chin J Traumatol. 2017 Aug;20(4):226-228. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2016.04.010. Epub 2017 May 26.
Sano A. Rib Radiography versus Chest Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Rib Fractures. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Nov;66(8):693-696. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1645887. Epub 2018 May 1.
Lee WS, Kim YH, Chee HK, Lee SA. Ultrasonographic evaluation of costal cartilage fractures unnoticed by the conventional radiographic study and multidetector computed tomography. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2012 Feb;38(1):37-42. doi: 10.1007/s00068-011-0117-2. Epub 2011 May 25.
Nummela MT, Bensch FV, Pyhalto TT, Koskinen SK. Incidence and Imaging Findings of Costal Cartilage Fractures in Patients with Blunt Chest Trauma: A Retrospective Review of 1461 Consecutive Whole-Body CT Examinations for Trauma. Radiology. 2018 Feb;286(2):696-704. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162429. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
Sermonesi G, Bertelli R, Pieracci FM, Balogh ZJ, Coimbra R, Galante JM, Hecker A, Weber D, Bauman ZM, Kartiko S, Patel B, Whitbeck SS, White TW, Harrell KN, Perrina D, Rampini A, Tian B, Amico F, Beka SG, Bonavina L, Ceresoli M, Cobianchi L, Coccolini F, Cui Y, Dal Mas F, De Simone B, Di Carlo I, Di Saverio S, Dogjani A, Fette A, Fraga GP, Gomes CA, Khan JS, Kirkpatrick AW, Kruger VF, Leppaniemi A, Litvin A, Mingoli A, Navarro DC, Passera E, Pisano M, Podda M, Russo E, Sakakushev B, Santonastaso D, Sartelli M, Shelat VG, Tan E, Wani I, Abu-Zidan FM, Biffl WL, Civil I, Latifi R, Marzi I, Picetti E, Pikoulis M, Agnoletti V, Bravi F, Vallicelli C, Ansaloni L, Moore EE, Catena F. Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF): the WSES and CWIS position paper. World J Emerg Surg. 2024 Oct 18;19(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13017-024-00559-2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
286117
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.