Laparoscopic Vaginal Cuff Suturing Profienciency for OBGYN Residents

NCT ID: NCT03360357

Last Updated: 2020-04-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-09-01

Study Completion Date

2020-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A recent survey of obstetrics and gynecology fellowship program directors showed that graduating OB/GYN residents may be underprepared for advanced laparoscopic training, necessitating an evaluation of the current structure of resident and fellow curriculum. Specifically, only 46% of first year fellows were able to independently perform an abdominal hysterectomy. Out of 28 residents tested using a previously validated laparoscopic cuff suturing model, only 8 (28.6%) passed the assessment.

For this reason, it is necessary to identify the most effective and efficient educational approaches to obtain procedural proficiency. Time and effort has been placed in developing simulation programs. Simulation has shown promising outcomes in improving the performance of trainees and attending physicians with the ultimate objective of generating better surgeons. A previous meta-analysis of simulation-based educational assessments demonstrated that these assessments correlate positively with patient-related outcomes. However, there are limited studies with adequate validity to use simulation for summative evaluations of performance for gynecology residents. The widely used Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program is used for credentialing of general surgeons, however, a systematic review suggested that more validity evidence is required to support its content (selection of tasks and scoring rubric) and the consequences (favorable and unfavorable impact) assessment. Although there has been an increase in the number of models available to teach OB/GYN common gynecologic procedures, there is a lack of evidence to support that these methods are actually allowing residents to create better surgical skills.

To address the current limitations in OB/GYN training, the investigators have developed short, guided drills that cover the steps required for laparoscopic suturing and allow residents opportunities for deliberate practice. These drills will be tested compared to residents watching a laparoscopic suturing video and practicing using a high fidelity, suturing simulation model. Both of these methods are standard educational approaches for teaching laparoscopic skills, but it is unknown if one of the approaches is more effective than the other.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Methods: Describe, in detail, the research activities that will be conducted under this protocol:

This study is a randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic suturing skills, specifically vaginal cuff closure, of OBGYN residents, fellows, and faculty using two different teaching methods and evaluate if there is any significant difference in their performance after teaching with the two different educational approaches. The laparoscopic camera/scope within a box trainer will video record the drills and the cuff suturing evaluation anonymously. These anonymous videos will be used to set proficiency standards for the drills and evaluate which educational approach is most effective.

The educational video and high fidelity simulation practice group will watch a 10 minute educational video on how to suture laparoscopically and then practice using a high fidelity simulation model for 15 minutes.

The second group is going to consist of "guided drills" as their laparoscopic training for 15 minutes. The residents will perform 5 set of exercises:

1. "Needle Dance" (Learning to manipulate the suture)
2. "Loopy Loop" (Learning to place needle through a loop)
3. "Slalom Course" (Passing the needle and suture through 5 rings right handed and left handed)
4. "Dense Matter" (Passing the needle through dense material without losing control of the needle)
5. "Respect for tissue" (Passing the needle through flimsy material without tearing)

After these exercises have been completed the participants will proceed to the 5 minute laparoscopic suturing evaluation. The evaluation will consist of closing the vaginal cuff in a previously validated simulator. The residents will have a determined amount of time to complete this task and the laparoscopic suturing will be filmed anonymously. Once the encounter is finished, the video will be saved, reviewed and graded using the previously validated global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills (GOALS).

* needle handling,
* getting the needle into the loop
* vaginal mucosa incorporation
* depth perception
* bimanual dexterity
* efficiency
* tissue handling
* Autonomy. Each area will consist of a score between 1 and 5. The "passing score" that defines proficiency will be 32 points as this number has been related to advance novice-expert in the past.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Educational Problems

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

guided drills

These people will be going through all the guided drills before being evaluated.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Guided drills

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

These residents will perform 5 set of exercises:

1. "Needle Dance" (Learning to manipulate the suture)
2. "Loopy Loop" (Learning to place needle through a loop)
3. "Slalom Course" (Passing the needle and suture through 5 rings right handed and left handed)
4. "Dense Matter" (Passing the needle through dense material without losing control of the needle)
5. "Respect for tissue" (Passing the needle through flimsy material without tearing)

Self-trained

These people will watch a video and be able to practice by themselves without having any direction regarding how and what to practice.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Guided drills

These residents will perform 5 set of exercises:

1. "Needle Dance" (Learning to manipulate the suture)
2. "Loopy Loop" (Learning to place needle through a loop)
3. "Slalom Course" (Passing the needle and suture through 5 rings right handed and left handed)
4. "Dense Matter" (Passing the needle through dense material without losing control of the needle)
5. "Respect for tissue" (Passing the needle through flimsy material without tearing)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Current OBGYN residents, fellows, and faculty at ACGME accredited residencies in the United States

Exclusion Criteria

* \- Non-current OBGYN residents at at ACGME accredited residencies in the United States
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mayo Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Christopher C. Destephano

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

17-008825

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.