Impact of Marking Surgical Incision on Patient's Abdomen
NCT ID: NCT01803334
Last Updated: 2020-09-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
4 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-06-30
2013-07-08
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Can Investigators Reduce Urinary Catheter Use and Lower Urinary Tract Infection Among Women Undergoing Benign Gynecologic Surgery?
NCT03127280
Pelvic Floor Support After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Conditions: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Vaginal Cuff Closure Techniques
NCT03753516
Postoperative Restrictions for Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Procedures
NCT06909058
Marcaine Use in Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery
NCT01861665
Mechanical Bowel Preparation Before Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT01576965
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
We hypothesize that preoperative marking and instruction about incision expectations will improve patient's postoperative satisfaction with scar appearance and symptoms as well as decrease incision site pain compared to traditional preoperative counseling.
Patients that will undergo laparoscopic surgical intervention will be identified. The patient will be randomized into two groups: preoperative marking the abdomen versus conventional preoperative counseling.
If the patient is randomized to the marking the abdomen group (study group) she will then have the anticipated incision needed to place the trocars during her surgery marked on her abdomen by the surgeon attending physician involved in the patient care during the preoperative counseling visit. If she is randomized to the control group, then she will undergo traditional preoperative counseling by the same team without marking the abdomen.
After completed the surgery, information regarding type of surgery, reason for the procedure, estimated blood loss, surgical length, complications, location and size of abdominal incisions made on the patient's abdomen will be collected. Then at the 6 weeks post op visit, patient's satisfaction with the incision scar will be evaluated with a validated patient scar assessment questionnaire form and by one 5 point Likert scale question used in previous studies. The pain at rest at the incision site will be evaluated by a Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS). Patients will also be asked to evaluate their generalized pain using a modified McGill Present Pain Intensity Scale.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Marking abdomen
If the patient is randomized to the marking the abdomen group (study group) she will then have the anticipated incision needed to place the trocars during her surgery marked on her abdomen by the surgeon attending physician involved in the patient care during the preoperative counseling visit.
Marking abdomen
If the patient is randomized to the marking the abdomen group (study group) she will then have the anticipated incision needed to place the trocars during her surgery marked on her abdomen by the surgeon attending physician involved in the patient care during the preoperative counseling visit.
Control
If she is randomized to the control group, then she will undergo traditional preoperative counseling by the same team without marking the abdomen.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Marking abdomen
If the patient is randomized to the marking the abdomen group (study group) she will then have the anticipated incision needed to place the trocars during her surgery marked on her abdomen by the surgeon attending physician involved in the patient care during the preoperative counseling visit.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Diagnosed with a benign surgical pathology
3. Patient scheduled for elective minimally invasive gynecologic surgery
Exclusion Criteria
2. History of prior laparoscopic surgery
3. Emergency surgery
4. Inability to provide informed consent
5. Unable to follow up in the office for post operative visits
6. Skin hypersensitivity or allergy to marker dye
7. Positive pregnancy test
18 Years
89 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
AdventHealth
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jose A carugno, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
AdventHealth
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Florida Hospital
Orlando, Florida, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
322259
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.