Marcaine Use in Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery

NCT ID: NCT01861665

Last Updated: 2018-10-12

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

27 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-06-30

Study Completion Date

2017-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this trial is to compare incisional pain in patients receiving pre-incisional versus post operative Marcaine injection.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Post-operative pain control is a key component of a patient's experience with surgery. In laparoscopic surgery, small (5 to 12mm) incisions are made, usually at the umbilicus and/on at either side of the lower abdomen, to allow insertion of a laparoscopic camera ("scope") and various laparoscopic instruments. The advantages for the patient of this approach compared to conventional open surgery include faster recovery with a significantly shorter hospital stay, less pain and less requirements for pain medication with a better cosmetic outcome. In many cases, the patient will go home within 24 hours of surgery. Many laparoscopic surgeons administer local anesthesia at the incision sites to assist in post-operative pain control. The best method for administration of the local anesthetic for optimal pain relief remains unclear. Some research has demonstrated that perhaps preemptive administration of local anesthetic improves post-operative pain control although in these studies, differences in patient populations and perception of pain between different patients makes comparison difficult. Optimizing analgesia protocols would benefit patients resulting in better pain relief and less use of narcotic analgesics with their associated side effects.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Post-operative Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Patients are acting as their own control receiving Bupivicaine (Marcaine) on both sides. One arm is pre incision the other arm is post incision.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Marcaine administered pre-incision.

Pre-operative administration, using both the specific drug - Marcaine 0.25%- and total amount - 5cc per incision.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Marcaine- 0.25%

Intervention Type DRUG

Marcaine 0.25% administered pre-incision.

Marcaine administered post-incision

Marcaine 0.25% administered post-incision, total amount 5cc per incision.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Marcaine 0.25%.

Intervention Type DRUG

Marcaine 0.25% administered post-incision.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Marcaine- 0.25%

Marcaine 0.25% administered pre-incision.

Intervention Type DRUG

Marcaine 0.25%.

Marcaine 0.25% administered post-incision.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* • Ages 18-50

* BMI 20-35
* Gynecologic ambulatory cases only
* Total of 3 incisions, with left and right incisions both being 5mm-10mm in size
* Not taking pain medications prior to surgery
* Length of surgery up to 3 hours
* PACU stay up to 6 hours
* Willing and able to sign informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* • Age or BMI out of range

* Surgery longer than 3 hours or PACU stay longer than 6 hours
* patients with chronic pelvic pain
* Oncologic cases
* Pregnant patients
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Glenn Schattman, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Weill Medical College of Cornell

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Weill Cornell Medical College

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Singer T, Huang JY, Schattman GL, Joseph M, Stubbs RE, Rosenwaks Z. RCT- Comparing Bupivicaine Adminstration in Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery Using Either a Pre-Incision or Post-Closure Injection. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 19 (6): S46, 2012.

Reference Type RESULT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1004010977

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.