Lidocaine and Outpatient Gynecologic Laparoscopy

NCT ID: NCT01250002

Last Updated: 2014-06-26

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 70 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2010-11-30
• Study Completion Date: 2011-10-31

Brief Summary

Although ambulatory gynecological laparoscopy is considered to be a minimally invasive surgical procedure, only 60% of patients undergoing this procedure are satisfied with postoperative pain control. Postoperative pain can lead to physiological, immunological and psychological derangements in patients.It also has been shown to be the most common cause of hospital admission after outpatient surgery.

Opioids constitute the most commonly used pain management strategy after surgery, however they have many undesirable side effects including nausea, vomiting and respiratory depression. Different strategies have been developed to decrease the amount of opioid required after surgery. Opioid sparing drugs as well as regional anesthesia have been shown to be effective. Systemic administration of lidocaine has been shown to decrease opioid consumption, improve recovery of bowel function and promote a better recovery after inpatient procedures. Lidocaine has been shown to have analgesic, antihyperalgesic and anti-inflammatory properties. It also has an excellent safety profile when give by a low-dose infusion.

The improvement of surgical technique and anesthesia care has made major adverse outcomes infrequent, especially in the ambulatory setting. Assessing patient's quality of recovery has become an important outcome in several studies. The patient's capacity to return to his normal activities is one of the most important sign of a successful outpatient procedure and it has significant economic implications.

Quality of recovery -40(QoR-40) is a validated 40 item instrument to assess the quality of post-operative recovery. Myels et al. have concluded that the QoR-40 would be a useful outcome measure to assess the impact on changes in health care delivery, but anesthesia studies underutilize this instrument.

The research question for the study is; does the use of systemic perioperative lidocaine improve quality of recovery after outpatient laparoscopy?

Detailed Description

70 subjects will be randomly allocated into 2 groups, using a computer generated table of random numbers. Group A (study group) will receive lidocaine. Group B (control group) will receive the same volume of saline infusion. The study drugs will be prepared by one of the investigators in the study. Subjects will be recruited up to 21 days prior to surgery.They will be premedicated with intravenous (IV) midazolam 0.04 mg/kg. Routine ASA monitors will be applied. Anesthesia will be induced with remifentanil infusion started at 0.1 mcg/kg/minute titrated to keep blood pressure within 20% of the baseline and propofol 1.0 -2.0 mg/kg. Group A will receive lidocaine 1.5mg/kg bolus and Group B the equivalent volume of saline. Subjects will be monitored with a 5 lead EKG throughout the lidocaine administration and if any arrhythmia is detected. The study drug will be stopped and investigators unblinded.

Tracheal intubation will be facilitated with rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg) or succinylcholine (1-2mg /kg). Immediately after the induction, group A will receive lidocaine infusion (2 mg/kg/hr IV). Group B will receive the equivalent volume of saline; both infusions will be continued until 1 hour after arrival in the PACU. Anesthesia will be maintained with desflurane titrated to maintain a bispectral index (BIS) between 40-60 , remifentanil infusion started at 0.1mcg/kg/min titrated to keep blood pressure within 20 % of baseline values , and rocuronium that will be administered at the discretion of the anesthesiologist. Upon termination of the surgery, neuromuscular blockade will be antagonized with a combination of neostigmine 0.05mg/kg and glycopyrrolate 0.01 mg/kg. Ondansetron 4 mg IV will be administered to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting. Subject will be evaluated for pain in the OR after extubation, using a numeric rating scale, if pain greater than 4/10 they will receive hydromorphone (10 mcg/kg IV). In PACU, subjects will receive IV hydromorphone in divided doses as needed to achieve a verbal rating score for pain <4 out of 10 and they will be evaluated every 15 minutes .They will also receive metoclopramide (20 mg IV ) as rescue antiemetic in PACU. Discharge readiness will be assessed by a PACU nurse using the modified Post Anesthesia Discharge Scoring System (MPADSS) score every 15 minutes for about 3 hours or until ready for discharge.The primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed by an independent observer who will be blinded to group allocation. Study personnel will contact the subject at 24 hours to assess well being, (nausea, vomiting and opioid consumption. Subject will be contacted by telephone by the study staff and will complete the Modified Quality of Recovery 40 (MQOR40) at 24 hours post surgery.

Conditions

Pain

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: DOUBLE

Study Groups

Lidocaine

Lidocaine administration 1.5 mg/kg bolus followed by a 2 mg/kg/hr infusion via intravenous catheter

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lidocaine

Intervention Type: DRUG

Lidocaine administration 1.5 mg/kg bolus followed by a 2 mg/kg/hr infusion via intravenous catheter

Placebo

Placebo will receive the same volume of saline infusion.

Group Type: PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type: DRUG

Placebo will receive the same volume of saline infusion.

Interventions

Placebo

Placebo will receive the same volume of saline infusion.

Intervention Type: DRUG

Lidocaine

Lidocaine administration 1.5 mg/kg bolus followed by a 2 mg/kg/hr infusion via intravenous catheter

Intervention Type: DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Female patients undergoing outpatient laparoscopic gynecologic surgery
• American society of anesthesiologists class (ASA) Physical status (PS) I and II
• Age between 18 and 64 years
• Fluent in English
• Body mass index (BMI) less than 35

Exclusion Criteria

• History of allergy to local anesthetics
• History of chronic opioid use
• Pregnant patients
• Body Mass Index (BMI) greater than 35
• History of electrocardiogram (EKG) abnormalities
• Hepatic Impairment
• History of congestive heart failure
• Electrocardiogram (EKG) abnormalities
• History of heart block (subject with history of heart block)
• Current use of anti-arrhythmic medications

Drop -Outs:

• Patient or surgeon request
• Conversion of the surgery from laparoscopic to open

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 64 Years
• Eligible Sex: FEMALE
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Northwestern University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Gildasio De Oliveira

Gildasio De Oliveira, M.D. Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Gildasio De Oliveira, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Northwestern University

Locations

Prentice Womens Hospital

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Countries

United States

References

Lovatsis D, Jose JB, Tufman A, Drutz HP, Murphy K. Assessment of patient satisfaction with postoperative pain management after ambulatory gynaecologic laparoscopy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007 Aug;29(8):664-7. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)32552-x.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 17714620 (View on PubMed)

Kehlet H, Holte K. Effect of postoperative analgesia on surgical outcome. Br J Anaesth. 2001 Jul;87(1):62-72. doi: 10.1093/bja/87.1.62. No abstract available.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 11460814 (View on PubMed)

McKay A, Gottschalk A, Ploppa A, Durieux ME, Groves DS. Systemic lidocaine decreased the perioperative opioid analgesic requirements but failed to reduce discharge time after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 2009 Dec;109(6):1805-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181be371b.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19923506 (View on PubMed)

White PF. The changing role of non-opioid analgesic techniques in the management of postoperative pain. Anesth Analg. 2005 Nov;101(5 Suppl):S5-S22. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000177099.28914.A7.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 16334489 (View on PubMed)

Koppert W, Weigand M, Neumann F, Sittl R, Schuettler J, Schmelz M, Hering W. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine has preventive effects on postoperative pain and morphine consumption after major abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg. 2004 Apr;98(4):1050-1055. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000104582.71710.EE.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 15041597 (View on PubMed)

Groudine SB, Fisher HA, Kaufman RP Jr, Patel MK, Wilkins LJ, Mehta SA, Lumb PD. Intravenous lidocaine speeds the return of bowel function, decreases postoperative pain, and shortens hospital stay in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Anesth Analg. 1998 Feb;86(2):235-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199802000-00003.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 9459225 (View on PubMed)

Kaba A, Laurent SR, Detroz BJ, Sessler DI, Durieux ME, Lamy ML, Joris JL. Intravenous lidocaine infusion facilitates acute rehabilitation after laparoscopic colectomy. Anesthesiology. 2007 Jan;106(1):11-8; discussion 5-6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200701000-00007.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 17197840 (View on PubMed)

Marret E, Rolin M, Beaussier M, Bonnet F. Meta-analysis of intravenous lidocaine and postoperative recovery after abdominal surgery. Br J Surg. 2008 Nov;95(11):1331-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6375.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 18844267 (View on PubMed)

Gill TM, Feinstein AR. A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements. JAMA. 1994 Aug 24-31;272(8):619-26.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 7726894 (View on PubMed)

Guyatt GH, Cook DJ. Health status, quality of life, and the individual. JAMA. 1994 Aug 24-31;272(8):630-1. No abstract available.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 8057520 (View on PubMed)

Watcha MF, Issioui T, Klein KW, White PF. Costs and effectiveness of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and acetaminophen for preventing pain after ambulatory otolaryngologic surgery. Anesth Analg. 2003 Apr;96(4):987-994. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000053255.93270.31.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 12651647 (View on PubMed)

Myles PS, Hunt JO, Nightingale CE, Fletcher H, Beh T, Tanil D, Nagy A, Rubinstein A, Ponsford JL. Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults. Anesth Analg. 1999 Jan;88(1):83-90. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199901000-00016.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 9895071 (View on PubMed)

Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):11-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 10740540 (View on PubMed)

De Oliveira GS Jr, Fitzgerald P, Streicher LF, Marcus RJ, McCarthy RJ. Systemic lidocaine to improve postoperative quality of recovery after ambulatory laparoscopic surgery. Anesth Analg. 2012 Aug;115(2):262-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318257a380. Epub 2012 May 14.

Reference Type: DERIVED

PMID: 22584558 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

STU00025240

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id