Analgesic Effect of Ketamine in Patients Undergoing Hysteroscopic Endometrial Thermal Ablation Surgery

NCT ID: NCT01106846

Last Updated: 2015-08-07

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-03-31

Study Completion Date

2013-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hypothesis: The intraoperative administration of ketamine will result in a 30% reduction in opiate requirement following endometrial ablation surgery and the intraoperative administration of ketamine will result in a decreased time to meet discharge criteria in the PACU following endometrial ablation surgery.

The research question is "Does intraoperative administration of ketamine result in decreased postoperative opiate requirement and time to discharge from the postanesthesia recovery unit (PACU) following hysteroscopic endometrial ablation".

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Preoperatively:

Subjects will be recruited up to 21days prior to the day of surgery. After informed consent is obtained, subjects will be randomly assigned to one of two groups:

Group A: Saline group Group B: 1% Ketamine group

A verbal rating scale (VRS) will be used to assess pain preoperatively. The patient will be asked to identify the severity of pain by indicating on a scale of 0-10 where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "the worst pain imaginable".

Baseline Quality of Recovery will be obtained. (Appendix F)

Subjects will be randomized prior to surgery to either Group A or Group B. The randomization table is computer generated. There is a 50% allocation to each group.

Intraoperatively:

Standard anesthetic monitoring will be used including monitoring of processed EEG including either the bi-spectral index (BIS) or similar standard of care ASA monitor. A standardized intraoperative anesthetic plan will be utilized by the anesthesia personnel. (Appendix A). Study drug will be prepared and labeled in 10mL syringes by research personnel who will not be involved in the study assessments. Study drug will be administered on initial insertion of Novasure® device (Appendix B).

Postoperatively:

Pain scores in the PACU will be assessed using the VRS upon admission and every 30 minutes thereafter until discharge criteria are met.

Additionally, nausea, vomiting and retching episodes will be recorded using a VRS.

Postoperative analgesic and antiemetic therapy will be standardized and total amounts of these agents will be recorded Assessment of psychomimetic effects including sedation and agitation will be assess postoperatively prior to discharge using the Richmond Agitation/Sedation Scale (Appendix D).

Acute recovery will be assessed using the Modified Post Anesthesia Discharge Scoring System (MPADSS) (Appendix E). A score of 8 or greater will indicate discharge readiness. Time to fulfill discharge criteria will be recorded.

Any other adverse events and medications required will be recorded. These data will be recorded by research personnel who will be blinded to the study group assignments.

Subjects will be contacted by telephone 24 hours after surgery to assess post-discharge quality of recovery (Appendix F).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A: Saline group

Group A: Saline group , infusion of saline intravenously

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Group A: Saline Group

Intervention Type DRUG

Saline continuous infusion

Group B: 1% Ketamine group

Group B: Infusion of ketamine 1% intravenously

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Group B: 1% Ketamine group

Intervention Type DRUG

Administration of 1% ketamine intravenously.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Group A: Saline Group

Saline continuous infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Group B: 1% Ketamine group

Administration of 1% ketamine intravenously.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Saline Ketamine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Gender: Female
* Age: 18-65 years
* Non-pregnant, non-lactating
* Surgery: Outpatient hysteroscopic Novasure® endometrial ablation
* Language: English speaking
* Consent: Obtained

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient refusal
* Under 18 or over age 65
* Non-English Speaking
* Pregnancy, Breast feeding
* Hysteroscopic procedures using Thermachoice® ablation device
* Chronic use or addiction to opiates, sedatives, non-opiate analgesics
* History of heavy alcohol usage (\>4 drinks/day)
* Significant cardiovascular or pulmonary disease
* Psychiatric or emotional disorder
* Allergy to anesthetic agents utilized in the protocol
* Glaucoma
* Thyrotoxicosis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Northwestern University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Shireen Ahmad

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shireen Ahmad, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Northwestern University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Prentice Women's Hosptial

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Schenker JG, Margalioth EJ. Intrauterine adhesions: an updated appraisal. Fertil Steril. 1982 May;37(5):593-610. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)46268-0. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6281085 (View on PubMed)

Jansen FW, Vredevoogd CB, van Ulzen K, Hermans J, Trimbos JB, Trimbos-Kemper TC. Complications of hysteroscopy: a prospective, multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Aug;96(2):266-70. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00865-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10908775 (View on PubMed)

Wong AY, Wong K, Tang LC. Stepwise pain score analysis of the effect of local lignocaine on outpatient hysteroscopy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2000 Jun;73(6):1234-7. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00498-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10856489 (View on PubMed)

Lau WC, Ho RY, Tsang MK, Yuen PM. Patient's acceptance of outpatient hysteroscopy. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1999;47(3):191-3. doi: 10.1159/000010092.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10087415 (View on PubMed)

De Iaco P, Marabini A, Stefanetti M, Del Vecchio C, Bovicelli L. Acceptability and pain of outpatient hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000 Feb;7(1):71-5. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(00)80012-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10648742 (View on PubMed)

MacPherson RD, Woods D, Penfold J. Ketamine and midazolam delivered by patient-controlled analgesia in relieving pain associated with burns dressings. Clin J Pain. 2008 Sep;24(7):568-71. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31816cdb20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18716494 (View on PubMed)

White PF, Way WL, Trevor AJ. Ketamine--its pharmacology and therapeutic uses. Anesthesiology. 1982 Feb;56(2):119-36. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198202000-00007. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6892475 (View on PubMed)

Bowdle TA, Radant AD, Cowley DS, Kharasch ED, Strassman RJ, Roy-Byrne PP. Psychedelic effects of ketamine in healthy volunteers: relationship to steady-state plasma concentrations. Anesthesiology. 1998 Jan;88(1):82-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199801000-00015.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9447860 (View on PubMed)

Deng XM, Xiao WJ, Luo MP, Tang GZ, Xu KL. The use of midazolam and small-dose ketamine for sedation and analgesia during local anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2001 Nov;93(5):1174-7. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200111000-00023.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11682390 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STU00026695

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.