Virtual and Video Counseling Versus In-Office Counseling for Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT ID: NCT05086406
Last Updated: 2025-02-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
128 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-05-01
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Patient Satisfaction With Virtual Visits
NCT04855708
The Effect of Vertical Versus Horizontal Vaginal Cuff Closure on Vaginal Length After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT02276261
Patient Satisfaction With Initial Phone Call Versus Office Visit Following Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy, a Randomized Controlled Trial.
NCT03809468
Study Comparing Conventional vs. Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT00485355
A Retrospective Review of Enseal Laparoscopic Vaginal Assisted Hysterectomy (LAVH) Versus Traditional LAVH
NCT01217866
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
In-Office Visit Group
This control group will undergo standard in-office pre-operative counseling visit.
No interventions assigned to this group
Virtual Visit Group
This study group will receive pre-operative counseling via video, created by the Department of Gynecology at Cleveland Clinic Florida, followed by a virtual visit with a gynecologic surgery provider.
Combination of Video and Virtual Pre-operative Counseling
Intervention will be a pre-operative counseling video followed by a virtual visit with a gynecologic surgery provider, using standard and secure communications.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Combination of Video and Virtual Pre-operative Counseling
Intervention will be a pre-operative counseling video followed by a virtual visit with a gynecologic surgery provider, using standard and secure communications.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age of 20 years or older
* Understand English language (written and spoken) without difficulty
Exclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of malignancy
* No access to technology that would allow for watching counseling video and/or completion of virtual visit
20 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Cleveland Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Katrin Arnolds, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cleveland Clinic Florida Gynecology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cleveland Clinic Florida
Weston, Florida, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Krantz TE, Rogers RG, Petersen TR, Dunivan GC, White AB, Madsen AM, Jeppson PC, Ninivaggio CS, Cichowski SB, Komesu YM. Peer-Centered Versus Standard Physician-Centered Video Counseling for Midurethral Sling Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 Aug;26(8):470-476. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000784.
Greene KA, Wyman AM, Scott LA, Hart S, Hoyte L, Bassaly R. Evaluation of patient preparedness for surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;217(2):179.e1-179.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.017. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
Fountain CR, Havrilesky LJ. Promoting Same-Day Discharge for Gynecologic Oncology Patients in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Sep-Oct;24(6):932-939. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 10.
Kenton K, Pham T, Mueller E, Brubaker L. Patient preparedness: an important predictor of surgical outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Dec;197(6):654.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.08.059.
Brubaker L, Litman HJ, Rickey L, Dyer KY, Markland AD, Sirls L, Norton P, Casiano E, Paraiso MF, Ghetti C, Rahn DD, Kusek JW. Surgical preparation: are patients "ready" for stress urinary incontinence surgery? Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Jan;25(1):41-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2184-x. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FLA 21-022
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.