Construct Validity of a Diagnostic Hysteroscopy Training Model

NCT ID: NCT02475252

Last Updated: 2022-08-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

15 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-04-30

Study Completion Date

2016-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In a prospective case-control study, the investigators compare the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) scores in medical students and gynecologic experts performing a hysteroscopy on a training model for diagnostic hysteroscopy. The investigators hypothesize that OSATS on a hysteroscopy training model has construct validity to discriminate between experts and novices.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In a prospective case-control study, 140 medical students (,novices') and 10 senior gynecologists (,experts') will watch a demonstration detailing how to perform a hysteroscopy on a training model. All probands will perform a hysteroscopy themselves within 1 hour after the demonstration. Their performance will be judged using an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) assessment. Using metrical and non-metrical measurements, construct validity of the hysteroscopy training model to distinguish between experts and novices will be assessed. Secondary endpoints are differences in OSATS scores within the group of novices based on gender and handyness, as well as satisfaction of the novices with the learning experience.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Menorrhagia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experts

Surgically experienced gynecologists with a personal history of at least 50 hysteroscopy procedures will perform a hysteroscopy on a training model.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

hysteroscopy on a training model

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Diagnostic hysteroscopy on a diagnostic hysteroscopy training model using a pelvic dummy and all surgical instruments also used in the original procedure. The performance of all participants will be scored using an OSATS scoring sheet developed for assessing surgical proficiency.

Novices

Medical students will perform a hysteroscopy on a training model.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

hysteroscopy on a training model

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Diagnostic hysteroscopy on a diagnostic hysteroscopy training model using a pelvic dummy and all surgical instruments also used in the original procedure. The performance of all participants will be scored using an OSATS scoring sheet developed for assessing surgical proficiency.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

hysteroscopy on a training model

Diagnostic hysteroscopy on a diagnostic hysteroscopy training model using a pelvic dummy and all surgical instruments also used in the original procedure. The performance of all participants will be scored using an OSATS scoring sheet developed for assessing surgical proficiency.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* medical Student
* no previous experience in gynecologic surgery
* no previous gynecologic surgery Training
* gynecologist with a personal history of at least 50 hysteroscopies)

Exclusion Criteria

* language barrier
* unwillingness to participate
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ruhr University of Bochum

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Clemens Tempfer

Prof. Clemens Tempfer, MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clemens B Tempfer, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ruhr University Bochum

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dept. OBGYN Ruhr University Bochum

Herne, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HSK-2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.