Hysteroscopic Guided Endometrial Sampling: Prospective Comparison Between 5Fr and 7Fr Biopsy Forceps (HYSTEROBIO)

NCT ID: NCT04519554

Last Updated: 2020-09-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

146 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-09-20

Study Completion Date

2021-12-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Indication for hysteroscopic guided biopsy compared to blind biopsy have been little evaluated. However, this kind of biopsy is usually performed in many centre. They allow exploration of uterine cavity but also to perform guided biopsies on the most suspicious area. However, with 5Fr forceps, biopsy are often too small to conclude.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Blind biopsies using Novak or Cormier cannula had limits. Demirkiran et al conclude on 673 women that histology was similar between biopsies and hysterectomy in only 67% of cases. Others studies conclude thatit is difficult to conclude about focal disease with blind biopsies.

A study compared blind biopsies to biopsy performed under hysteroscopic guidance in women using Tamoxifene and conclude that guided biopsies were more specific (80% versus 68.9%) and a better positive predictive value (68.9% versus 43.7%) for all kind of endometrial pathologies

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Biopsy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

5FR + 7FR

Each woman is its own control and had biopsies with the 2 size of forceps. In this group first with 5FR then 7 FR

Group Type OTHER

Endometrial sampling

Intervention Type DEVICE

Endometrial sampling with 2 different forceps

7FR + 5FR

Each woman is its own control and had biopsies with the 2 size of forceps. In this group first with 7FR then 5FR

Group Type OTHER

Endometrial sampling

Intervention Type DEVICE

Endometrial sampling with 2 different forceps

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endometrial sampling

Endometrial sampling with 2 different forceps

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* • Woman over 18 year-old with abnormal uterine bleeding (or endometrium thickness over 10mm) and risk factors of endometrial carcinoma, or endometrium thickness over 5mm in a menopausal woman or abnormal uterine bleeding after 45 years old.

* Woman who speak and understand french
* Woman who give her written informed consent
* Woman covered by french medical insurance

Exclusion Criteria

* • Pregnant or breastfeeding patient

* Patient under guardianship, curators or safeguard of justice.
* Patient participating in another ongoing study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Perine CAPMAS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

APHP

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

AP-HP, Bicêtre Hospital

Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Perinne CAPMAS

Role: CONTACT

+33(0)145217701

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2017-A00621-52

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

APHP200243

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The Hysteroscopic Morcellator (HM).
NCT01537822 COMPLETED NA