The Effect of Hysterotomy Technique on the Rate of Large Defects in the Hysterotomy Scar

NCT ID: NCT01091181

Last Updated: 2018-05-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

122 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-10-31

Study Completion Date

2017-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The Effect of Cesarean Operative Technique on the Occurrence of Large Hysterotomy Scar Defects.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Having a Caesarean leads to a scar in the uterus, which does not always heal properly. Defective healing can lead to serious complications in the next pregnancy and delivery. Different surgical techniques can be used for a Caesarean section.

The aim is to compare two surgical techniques (different ways of opening the uterus), to investigate whether one or the other technique leads to fewer defective scars in the uterus. Both these techniques are in use at the clinic. After the operation, patients are cared for in the normal way.

Six months after the Caesarean, patients are examined using vaginal ultrasound. Vaginal ultrasound allows to see if the scar after the Caesarean has healed well, or if there are defects in it.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Scars

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

women aimed for emergency cesarean section were randomized into two groups according to surgery technique of opening the uterus: 1 Group - high level of hysterotomy incision; 2 Group - low level of hysterotomy incision. Opening and closing of abdomen performed in the same manner in both groups
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
the surgeon who performed the operation knew what technique to use. Participant were not informed in what group they were. Six months postpartum patients came to ultrasound department and underwent ultrasound examination of uterus and uterine cesarean scar. Sonographer was blinded to the surgery technique.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

high incision group

hysterotomy at cesarean performed 2 cm above plica vesicouterina

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

hysterotomy at cesarean

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

incision to open the uterus at cesarean.

low incision group

hysterotomy at cesarean performed 2 cm below plica vesicouterina

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

hysterotomy at cesarean

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

incision to open the uterus at cesarean.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

hysterotomy at cesarean

incision to open the uterus at cesarean.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ≥ 18 years old
* gestational age ≥ 37 gestational weeks
* cervical dilatation ≥5 cm,
* no previous uterine surgery other than cone biopsy, loop electrosurgical excision procedure, dilatation and curettage, or dilatation and evacuation, undergoing emergency caesarean section.

Exclusion Criteria

• need of immediate caesarean section, defined as delivery of the baby within 20 minutes.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Region Skane

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Olga Vikhareva, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Skane University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Skåne University Hospital Malmö

Malmo, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2-valentin

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

NCT03498339

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: nct_alias

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Myomectomy During Cesarean Section
NCT03095014 COMPLETED PHASE1