Nonsurgical Management of Cesarean Scar Niche Related Abnormal Uterine Bleeding

NCT ID: NCT05594186

Last Updated: 2022-10-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

158 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-03-01

Study Completion Date

2022-10-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A study of the effect of three different nonsurgical methods for management of abnormal uterine bleeding caused by cesarean scar niche. The study was conducted at the Obstetrics and Gynaecology department of the Saudi German Hospital in Madinah- Saudi Arabia, during the period between March 2019 to October 2022. The study protocol was in accordance with the Helsinki declaration 1964 and the later amendments. A prospective approval was granted by the human research ethics committee of the hospital and the study participants have signed an informed consent.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study included 158 patients aged between 20 and 40 years who had a history of at least one caesarean delivery and presented with abnormal uterine bleeding in the form of postmenstrual spotting defined as bloody or brownish discharge of more than two days after the end of menstruation, with the total duration of (menses and spotting) of more than 7 days, or intermenstrual bleeding that starts after the end of the menses, who were diagnosed to have a caesarean scar niche by saline infusion sonography. Cesarean scar niche was defined as an anechoic triangular indentation at the site of the previous cesarean scar with a depth of at least 2 mm. Exclusion criteria were: pregnancy, desire for fertility within one year of enrolment in the study, any medical condition contraindicating the use of combined oral contraceptive pills, history of abnormal uterine bleeding dating before the last caesarean section, use of any hormonal treatment 3 months prior to enrolment, coagulopathy, and organic causes of bleeding like uterine fibroids, adenomyosis or endometrial hyperplasia. Saline infusion sonography was done, in which instillation of saline solution into the uterine cavity, enhanced the transvaginal ultrasonographic image by providing a sonolucent contrast medium to allow for better visualization and delineation of the defect. Evaluation was performed according to the 2019 modified Delphi procedure where the basic evaluation of CS niche included measurements of the length, depth and width of the defect, the residual myometrial thickness (RMT) and the adjacent myometrial thickness (AMT). All measurements were made in the sagittal plane except the width which was measured in the transverse plane. The 4.5 MHz endovaginal transducer (Canon Xario 200G Ultrasound, Japan) was used.

Using an Open Epi version 3.21 computer-based software, patients were divided into four groups (A, B, C and D). Patients in group A, received Tranexamic acid 1300 mg (2 tablets of 650 mg) three times daily for 5 days starting from the first day of menses for 12 months. Patients in group B, received combined oral contraceptive pill (OCP) once daily for 21 days starting from the first day of menses, then to have a one-week pill free period to allow for a withdrawal bleed, and that was repeated for 12 cycles. Patients in group C, received a combination of Tranexamic acid 1300 mg three times daily for 5 days, and a combined oral contraceptive pill once daily for 21 days, both starting from the first day of menses for 12 consecutive cycles. Patients in group D, had the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system inserted into the uterine cavity. The insertion was done by a skilled gynecologist as an outpatient procedure without anesthesia. The possible long- and short-term side effects of the different interventions were carefully discussed with all patients, and those who were willing to participate had signed the informed consent before participation. The primary outcome was the improvement of postmenstrual spotting as reported by the patients in their menstrual diary at each of the follow up visits (three, six, nine and twelve months) after enrolment in the study.

The participants were asked to complete the menstrual diary card that was designed based on that used in the study of Johannes and colleagues in 1996. The illustrated symbols at the top of the card indicated the heaviness of menstrual bleeding (flooding, heavy, normal, light or spotting) and the names of the months were written on the left side of the card.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intermenstrual Bleeding

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tranexamic acid

Patients in group A, received Tranexamic acid 1300 mg (2 tablets of 650 mg) three times daily for 5 days starting from the first day of menses for 12 months.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Tranexamic acid, Oral contraceptive pills and the Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.

Intervention Type DRUG

Comparing three different nonsurgical management options for abnormal uterine bleeding caused by cesarean scar niche.

Combined oral contraceptive pill

Patients in group B, received combined oral contraceptive pill (OCP) once daily for 21 days (Desogestrel 150 micrograms/ Ethinylestradiol 30 micrograms, tablets), starting from the first day of menses, then to have a one-week pill free period to allow for a withdrawal bleed, and that was repeated for 12 cycles.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Tranexamic acid, Oral contraceptive pills and the Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.

Intervention Type DRUG

Comparing three different nonsurgical management options for abnormal uterine bleeding caused by cesarean scar niche.

Tranexamic acid plus Combined oral contraceptive pill

Patients in group C, received a combination of Tranexamic acid 1300 mg three times daily for 5 days, and a combined oral contraceptive pill once daily for 21 days (Desogestrel 150 micrograms/ Ethinylestradiol 30 micrograms, tablets), both starting from the first day of menses for 12 consecutive cycles.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Tranexamic acid, Oral contraceptive pills and the Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.

Intervention Type DRUG

Comparing three different nonsurgical management options for abnormal uterine bleeding caused by cesarean scar niche.

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system

Patients in group D, had the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system inserted into the uterine cavity. The insertion was done by a skilled gynecologist as an outpatient procedure without anesthesia.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Tranexamic acid, Oral contraceptive pills and the Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.

Intervention Type DRUG

Comparing three different nonsurgical management options for abnormal uterine bleeding caused by cesarean scar niche.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tranexamic acid, Oral contraceptive pills and the Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.

Comparing three different nonsurgical management options for abnormal uterine bleeding caused by cesarean scar niche.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The study included 158 patients aged between 20 and 40 years who had a history of at least one caesarean delivery and presented with abnormal uterine bleeding in the form of postmenstrual spotting defined as bloody or brownish discharge of more than two days after the end of menstruation, with the total duration of (menses and spotting) of more than 7 days, or intermenstrual bleeding that starts after the end of the menses, who were diagnosed to have a caesarean scar niche by saline infusion sonography. Cesarean scar niche was defined as an anechoic triangular indentation at the site of the previous cesarean scar with a depth of at least 2 mm. Saline infusion sonography was done, in which instillation of saline solution into the uterine cavity, enhanced the transvaginal ultrasonographic image by providing a sonolucent contrast medium to allow for better visualization and delineation of the defect. Evaluation was performed according to the 2019 modified Delphi procedure where the basic evaluation of CS niche included measurements of the length, depth and width of the defect, the residual myometrial thickness (RMT) and the adjacent myometrial thickness (AMT). All measurements were made in the sagittal plane except the width which was measured in the transverse plane. The 4.5 MHz endovaginal transducer was used.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Saudi German Hospital - Madinah

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Islam Mohamed Magdi Ammar

Consultant and associate Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Islam Mohamed Magdi Ammar, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Saudi German Hospital - Madinah

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Saudi German Hospital

Al Madīnah, Madinah, Saudi Arabia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Saudi Arabia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SGHM-FEB2019-OBGYN

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.