Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Removing Skin Tags With Digiclamp
NCT ID: NCT03259295
Last Updated: 2023-02-15
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-12-01
2019-06-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Using a Novel Skin Tag Removal Device
NCT06463613
Study to Evaluate Outcomes of Patients Receiving Treatment for Wound Care, Pain Management or Surface Skin Scar Therapy
NCT02445235
Evaluating the Efficacy of the Melanocyte Keratinocyte Transplantation Procedure in the Treatment of Vitiligo
NCT04374435
Management of Complex Wounds Using a Constant Tension External Tissue Expander
NCT01171521
Characterization of Dyschromic Hypertrophic Scar
NCT04619589
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The Digiclamp device was invented to make skin tag removal procedures more accessible. The Digiclamp represents a new option that when placed in the hands of primary care clinicians, it will allow them to remove skin tags without having to purchase expensive devices or to refer them to a Dermatologist. The device is disposable, and relatively painless when used correctly, and requires minimal training.
The investigator is planning to enroll 100 subjects, who will have skin tags removed using the Digiclamp device. Subjects will return for follow up at 2-3 months after skin tag removal.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Skin tag removal initial visit plus follow-up
Removal of skin tags 1 cm or less using Digiclamp and follow-up 2-3 months after skin tag removal to assess functionality and effectiveness of the device.
Digiclamp (Skin tag removal initial plus follow-up)
Skin tag will be assessed for size, location, and overall appearance. After assessment and confirmation that the skin tag is not infected or possibly malignant, the site will be photographed, prepped with an antimicrobial solution, anesthetized, and removed using the Digiclamp. A bandaid will be applied to the site. Site of skin tag removal will be photographed to document lesion recurrence and presence of scar tissue or hyperpigmentation. Subjects will be asked to complete a brief survey about their satisfaction with the use of Digiclamp.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Digiclamp (Skin tag removal initial plus follow-up)
Skin tag will be assessed for size, location, and overall appearance. After assessment and confirmation that the skin tag is not infected or possibly malignant, the site will be photographed, prepped with an antimicrobial solution, anesthetized, and removed using the Digiclamp. A bandaid will be applied to the site. Site of skin tag removal will be photographed to document lesion recurrence and presence of scar tissue or hyperpigmentation. Subjects will be asked to complete a brief survey about their satisfaction with the use of Digiclamp.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Subjects whose skin tags appear infected or may need to be evaluated by pathology
* Subjects whose skin tags are located in genital areas or eyelids
* Pregnant subjects
* Subjects with bleeding disorders.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
XDG Technologies, LLC
INDUSTRY
University of Florida
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Juan C Roig, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Florida
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Office of Raymond Marquette, MD
Ocala, Florida, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Watson BT, Hennrikus WL. Postaxial type-B polydactyly. Prevalence and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Jan;79(1):65-8. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199701000-00007.
Schmook T, Stockfleth E. Current treatment patterns in non-melanoma skin cancer across Europe. J Dermatolog Treat. 2003;14 Suppl 3:3-10. doi: 10.1080/jdt.14.s3.3.10.
Kahana M, Grossman E, Feinstein A, Ronnen M, Cohen M, Millet MS. Skin tags: a cutaneous marker for diabetes mellitus. Acta Derm Venereol. 1987;67(2):175-7.
Banik R, Lubach D. Skin tags: localization and frequencies according to sex and age. Dermatologica. 1987;174(4):180-3. doi: 10.1159/000249169.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PRO00002692
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
20171314 - WIRB
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.