Benign Liver Optimal Core Study (Tissue Acquisition Comparison in Benign Liver Disease)

NCT ID: NCT03245580

Last Updated: 2022-04-07

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

153 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-03-08

Study Completion Date

2020-09-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary purpose of this prospective, randomized, multicenter study is to evaluate and compare the amount and quality of tissue samples yielded in a liver biopsy comparing 2 different techniques of EUS guided CORE liver biopsy for benign disease. The two techniques: "modified Wet suction" and "Slow pull" technique of collecting tissue from a liver biopsy via Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Each subject will have a biopsy performed via one of 2 different techniques: "modified wet suction", or "slow pull" technique. A randomization process will determine which technique. Each subject shall undergo 2 passes (2 cores of tissue will be obtained - ideally from the right and left lobe of the liver.

Quality of tissue obtained via the 2 different techniques will be evaluated by number of fragments, length of specimens and number of tracts observed by the local pathologist and compared between the tissues obtained from the two techniques. .

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Liver Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

prospective, randomized, multicenter study
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1 -modified wet suction

Intervention:Procedure Core Liver Biopsy Technique: Modified Wet Suction

Group Type OTHER

Core Liver Biopsy

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Diagnostic EUS examination followed by liver biopsy to obtain core sample in benign liver disease.

Arm 2- Slow Pull

Intervention: Procedure Core Liver Biopsy Technique: Slow Pull

Group Type OTHER

Core Liver Biopsy

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Diagnostic EUS examination followed by liver biopsy to obtain core sample in benign liver disease.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Core Liver Biopsy

Diagnostic EUS examination followed by liver biopsy to obtain core sample in benign liver disease.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects that plan to undergo a liver biopsy via EUS to confirm possible underlying liver disease or to determine stage, grade and presence of fibrosis for suspected benign etiology.
* History of abnormal LFTs
* Documented history of chronic liver disease
* Question of underlying liver disease as cause of abnormal imaging or symptoms which may be attributed to liver disorder
* Fatty liver disease
* Subjects 18 years of age or older
* Subject must be able to hold anticoagulants as per institutional standard of care
* Subjects must be deemed physically able to undergo anesthesia. This includes either Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC) or general anesthesia.
* Subjects (or the subjects Legally Authorized Representative \[LAR\]) that have agreed to participate in the study and have signed Informed Consent
* Women of child bearing potential who are not pregnant as proven by a negative pregnancy test may be included.

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects that are unable to tolerate anesthesia for the procedure
* Subjects 17 or under
* Subjects whose anticoagulants cannot be held
* Subjects who cannot have or refuse EUS guided procedure
* Subjects who are pregnant
* INR \>1.5
* Platelets 50,000 or less
* Subjects requiring control of bleeding on initial upper endoscopy
* Subjects requiring endoscopic mucosal resection
* Subjects with large volume ascites
* Subjects requiring pancreatic biopsies
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Parkview Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Neil Sharma, M.D.

President, Parkview Cancer Institute;Director Advanced Interventional Endoscopy & Endoscopic Oncology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Neil R Sharma, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

parkview cancer institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University South Alabama

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Santa CLara Valley Medical Center

San Jose, California, United States

Site Status

Parkview Regional Medical Center

Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Indiana University

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Oschner Health System

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Geisinger Medical Center

Danville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Baylor Medical Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PRC17-0714

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Accurate Point of Care Liver Disease Diagnostics
NCT05986916 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING