The Cluster-randomized Evaluation of the IKO-model

NCT ID: NCT03239249

Last Updated: 2022-09-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

7678 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-03-01

Study Completion Date

2021-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to analyze whether and how a systemic school-level approach to dropout prevention (the IKO-model), increase the completion rate from upper secondary school. The hypothesis is that schools that implement the model (i.e. randomized to the experimental group), will reduce the amount of students in risk of dropout, compared to their counterparts in schools randomized to the control group. The main expected outcomes in the study are; 1) increased amounts of students in upper secondary education completing their education within the three-year standard length of education, 2) decreased amounts of school-drop out, and 3) reduced values in mediating variables, such as low achievement, course failures, lack of attendance and lack of school-motivation and -effort. Accordingly, implementation quality and fidelity to the model will be assessed, both with quantitative (survey) and qualitative (interviews and observation) data. A total of five counties and 42 upper secondary schools participate in the evaluation project. One of the counties (Akershus County) have developed and piloted the model and function as a mentor in the other four counties (Oppland, Hedmark, Nord-Trøndelag and Hamar). While 20 schools have been randomized to the experimental group, 22 schools have been randomized to the control group. Schools randomized to the control group will work as earlier with school dropout.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this study is to analyze whether and how a systemic school-level approach to dropout prevention (the IKO-model), increase the completion rate from upper secondary school. The hypothesis is that schools that implement the model (i.e. randomized to the experimental group), will reduce the amount of students in risk of dropout, compared to their counterparts in schools randomized to the control group. The main expected outcomes in the study are; 1) increased amounts of students in upper secondary education completing their education within the three-year standard length of education, 2) decreased amounts of school-drop out, and 3) reduced values in mediating variables, such as low achievement, course failures, lack of attendance and lack of school-motivation and -effort. Accordingly, implementation quality and fidelity to the model will be assessed, both with quantitative (survey) and qualitative (interviews and observation) data. A total of five counties and 42 upper secondary schools participate in the evaluation project. One of the counties (Akershus County) have developed and piloted the model and function as a mentor in the other four counties (Oppland, Hedmark, Nord-Trøndelag and Hamar). While 20 schools have been randomized to the experimental group, 22 schools have been randomized to the control group. Schools randomized to the control group will work as earlier with school dropout.

The implemented model is based on the County of Akershus´ experiences of developing and implementing the IKO-model since 2009. The IKO-model represents a systemic intervention at the school-level level, with the aim of improving the schools' follow-up structures related to students in risk of school dropout.

The basic idea of the model is that there are three groups of students: 1) students with ordinary follow-up needs, 2) students with the right to special education and 3) students without the right to special education, but who need individually targeted efforts from time to time. While there are guidelines and requirements when it comes to the follow-up of students with the right to special education, schools are less systematic in their approaches to students with temporary need for follow-up. Hence, the IKO-model focuses on improving the way schools identify and follow-up students in risk for dropout, but who do not qualify for special education. It is also emphasized, that time-limited and low-cost interventions are sufficient enough to reduce the risk of drop-out for the majority of students within this group, however the most important is to identify problems early and find solutions quickly. The goal is to remove the need for additional interventions as soon as possible and return students to normal education.

Another assumption is that the model will help schools to implement goal-focused targeted interventions at an early stage and ensure that the measures implemented are adjusted based on student needs. At student level the model aim to a) early identify students "in risk" for drop-out , b) charter students´ situation in order to find suitable interventions, and c) follow-up identified students with immediate interventions including an ongoing evaluation of their situation. In order for schools to succeed at identifying, chartering and following-up students, three main school-level components are implemented; 1) a computer assisted early warning system, 2) organizational structures and practices that enables schools to monitor progress and implement effective interventions, and 3) external and school internal communities of learning.

The research question is whether, how and to what extent the IKO-model reduce drop-out from upper secondary school. The hypothesis is that the IKO-model will assist schools in their work with identifying, charting and supporting students in risk through the early warning system, organization-level monitoring practices, and communities of learning. The main outcome assessed is reduced amounts of students that dropout from upper secondary school measured through increased amounts of students accomplishing education within the three-year standard length. The intervention is also expected to reduce amounts of students not in education, activity or employment at follow-up.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

School Drop Out Prevention

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Of all schools (42) in four counties, 20 have been randomized to experimental and 22 have been randomized to control condition. Schools randomized to experimental condition implement the IKO-model, while schools randomized to control condition work with drop-out as previously.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Students and guardians are masked for experimental condition, teachers and collaborating professionals are not.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention group: IKO-model (20 schools)

Schools randomized to experimental group will implement the IKO-drop-out prevention intervention. Each county have a project leader responsible for following up the implementation. The model is described in a manual, that schools should follow.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

IKO-model

Intervention Type OTHER

A systematic model for drop-out prevention.

Treatment as usual (22 schools)

Schools randomized to control group will work as previously with their drop-out prevention. This include various activities, but they are not systematic as in the IKO-model.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Treatment as usual

Intervention Type OTHER

Schools randomized to control group (22) work as previously with school dropout

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

IKO-model

A systematic model for drop-out prevention.

Intervention Type OTHER

Treatment as usual

Schools randomized to control group (22) work as previously with school dropout

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 42 upper secondary schools in 4 Norwegian counties participate in the evaluation project.
* All first grade students in 2016 and 2017 arre followed up in the project.
* All first grade teachers are included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

NA
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Norwegian ministry of Education and Research

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Oslo Metropolitan University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Arendal videregående skole

Arendal, Aust-Agder Fylkeskommune, Norway

Site Status

Sam Eyde videregående skole

Arendal, Aust-Agder, Norway

Site Status

Dahlske videregående skole

Grimstad, Aust-Agder, Norway

Site Status

Setesdal videregående skole

Hornnes, Aust-Agder, Norway

Site Status

Møglestu videregående skole

Lillesand, Aust-Agder, Norway

Site Status

Risør videregående skole

Risør, Aust-Agder, Norway

Site Status

Tvedestrand og Åmli videregående skole

Tvedestrand, Aust-Agder, Norway

Site Status

Storsteigen videregående skole

Alvdal, Hedmark, Norway

Site Status

Solør videregående skole

Braskereidfoss, Hedmark, Norway

Site Status

Ringsaker videregående skole

Brumunddal, Hedmark, Norway

Site Status

Elverum videregående skole

Elverum, Hedmark, Norway

Site Status

Hamar katedralskole

Hamar, Hedmark, Norway

Site Status

Storhamar videregående skole

Hamar, Hedmark, Norway

Site Status

Midt-Østedal videregående skole

Koppang, Hedmark, Norway

Site Status

Skarnes videregående skole

Skarnes, Hedmark, Norway

Site Status

Jønsberg videregående skole

Stange, Hedmark, Norway

Site Status

Stange videregående skole

Stange, Hedmark, Norway

Site Status

Trysil videregående skole

Trysil, Hedmark, Norway

Site Status

Nord-Østedal videregående skole

Tynset, Hedmark, Norway

Site Status

Grong videregående skole

Grong, Nord-Trøndelag, Norway

Site Status

Inderøy videregående skole

Inderøy, Nord-Trøndelag, Norway

Site Status

Leksvik videregående skole

Leksvik, Nord-Trøndelag, Norway

Site Status

Levanger videregående skole

Levanger, Nord-Trøndelag, Norway

Site Status

Meråker videregående skole

Meråker, Nord-Trøndelag, Norway

Site Status

Olav Duun videregående skole

Namsos, Nord-Trøndelag, Norway

Site Status

Mære landbruksskole

Sparbu, Nord-Trøndelag, Norway

Site Status

Steinkjer videregående skole

Steinkjer, Nord-Trøndelag, Norway

Site Status

Ole Vig videregående skole

Stjørdal, Nord-Trøndelag, Norway

Site Status

Verdal videregående skole

Verdal, Nord-Trøndelag, Norway

Site Status

Dokka videregående skole

Dokka, Oppland, Norway

Site Status

Gjøvik videregående skole

Gjøvik, Oppland, Norway

Site Status

Hadeland videregående skole

Gran, Oppland, Norway

Site Status

Nord Gulbrandsdalen videregående skole

Gulbrandsdalen, Oppland, Norway

Site Status

Valdres videregående skole

Leira, Oppland, Norway

Site Status

Lena-Valle videregående skole

Lena, Oppland, Norway

Site Status

Lillehammer videregående skole

Lillehammer, Oppland, Norway

Site Status

Raufoss videregående skole

Raufoss, Oppland, Norway

Site Status

Vinstra videregående skole

Vinstra, Oppland, Norway

Site Status

Gausdal videregående skole

Østre Gausdal, Oppland, Norway

Site Status

Sentrum videregående skole

Kongsvinger, , Norway

Site Status

Øvrebyen videregående skole

Kongsvinger, , Norway

Site Status

Ytre Namdal videregående skole

Rørvik, , Norway

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

48657 (NSD)

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Preventing Violence by Teachers
NCT03893851 COMPLETED NA
Good Schools Study
NCT01678846 COMPLETED NA