The Effect of Controlled Feedback on the Rehabilitation of Individuals With Disability Due to Stiff Shoulder Following Trauma

NCT ID: NCT03196674

Last Updated: 2017-08-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-08-31

Study Completion Date

2018-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will compare the effect of manipulated vs. non-manipulated feedback during the rehabilitation of individuals with disability due to stiff shoulder following multiple trauma. This will be accomplished using the state-of-the-art real-time motion capture technology.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this intervention, comparative study, 30 individuals with stiff shoulder following fracture to the proximal humerus (4 weeks to 6 months following the injury) will be treated at the Gait and Motion Laboratory at the Hadassah Medical Center in Jerusalem. Each subject will undergo a 12-session treatment (2-3 times a week, 30 minutes per session). In each session, reflective markers will be placed on the upper or lower body of the patient. Ten fast infra-red cameras will detect the movement of the patient and provide real-time feedback when obtaining a correct movement pattern, as instructed by the therapist, pretrial. The motion capture system will provide visual and auditory feedback of success, via a large screen, located on the wall. This could be manipulated so that the feedback is provided for a slightly higher range than instructed by the therapist.

The subjects will be randomly divided into two groups. One group will receive the non-manipulated feedback treatment for 6 sessions and then the manipulated feedback treatment for the remaining 6 sessions and vice versa for the second group. The shoulder passive and active range of motions, pain and activity levels will be tested 3 times: at baseline, following 6 and 12 sessions. A satisfactory questionnaire will be filled out by each patient twice, following 6 and 12 sessions.

The study will test for no differences in the overall progress of the patients during the 12-session rehabilitation period. The study will further test for differences in all outcome measures between the manipulated and non-manipulated treatment sessions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fracture Humerus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

manipulated feedback

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Biofeedback via motion capture

Intervention Type OTHER

The motion capture system will provide visual and auditory feedback of success, via a large screen, located on the wall. This could be manipulated so that the feedback is provided for a slightly higher range than instructed by the therapist.

non-manipulated feedback

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Biofeedback via motion capture

Intervention Type OTHER

The motion capture system will provide visual and auditory feedback of success, via a large screen, located on the wall. This could be manipulated so that the feedback is provided for a slightly higher range than instructed by the therapist.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Biofeedback via motion capture

The motion capture system will provide visual and auditory feedback of success, via a large screen, located on the wall. This could be manipulated so that the feedback is provided for a slightly higher range than instructed by the therapist.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Restricted shoulder motion (up to 90 degrees in abduction and flexion) following proximal humerus fracture, 4 weeks to 6 months following injury, without rotatory cuff tear
* Normal or corrected eyesight and hearing.

Exclusion Criteria

* Neurological deficiencies that restrict upper limb.
* Previous injury to the shoulder
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sigal Portnoy

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Uri Safran

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Shaul Beit

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Isabella Shvartz

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Isabella Shvartz

MD

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hadassah Medical Center

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Israel

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Isabella Schwartz, MD

Role: CONTACT

(972) -(0)2-5844474

Hadas Lemberg, PhD

Role: CONTACT

00 972 2 6777572

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Adamovich SV, Fluet GG, Tunik E, Merians AS. Sensorimotor training in virtual reality: a review. NeuroRehabilitation. 2009;25(1):29-44. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2009-0497.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19713617 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Shoulder- HMO-CTIL

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.