Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
58 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-01-01
2021-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Previous studies indicate that patient characteristics and clinical and psychological factors are related to the effect of surgical treatment but more knowledge about predictors is important in the selection of patients for arthroscopic subacromial decompression.
Objective:
To identify patient characteristics and clinical and psychological factors for pre-operatively predicting the effect of arthroscopic subacromial decompression.
Method:
Patients meting the inclusion criteria will consecutively be enrolled in the study when referred to arthroscopic subacromial decompression. Prior to surgery, patient characteristics and clinical data will be collected. At six and twelve month postoperatively, the effect of the surgical treatment will be assessed. The relationship between effect of surgery and patient characteristics and clinical factors collected at baseline will be examined.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Shoulder Surgery Traditional vs Accelerated Rehabilitation Trial
NCT03913611
Radiofrequency Microtenotomy for Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
NCT02275689
Enhanced Function and Quality of Life Following 5 Months of Exercise Therapy for Patients With Rotator Cuff Tears
NCT02740946
The Effect of an Evidence-based Physiotherapy Regimen for Patients With Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
NCT02304003
Effects of Supervised Physical Therapy With Early Activation of the Rotator Cuff Versus Home Exercises in Patients After Arthroscopic Subacromial Decompression
NCT01054326
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Treatment of SIS consists of either conservative- or surgical treatment. Conservative treatments include rest, physiotherapy, non-steroid anti inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and glucocorticoid injections, while surgical treatment consists of arthroscopic or open subacromial decompression, bursectomy and rotator cuff repair. Physiotherapy interventions are recommended as first choice of treatment, while surgical treatment can be considered for those who fail to respond to conservative treatment after 3-6 months. Several studies comparing the effect of arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASAD) and supervised physiotherapy exercises, have found no significant differences in outcomes between the two treatment strategies.
In Denmark, the number of patients with SIS has increased by 36% from 2006 to 2010. The number of patients treated surgically has increased by 60% to approximately 6500 a year in the same period. Similar increases are reported in other countries.
The literature indicates that some patients do not benefit from ASAD, and success rates between 65-80% have been reported. In Denmark, 10% of employed patients retire prematurely within two years after surgery. Results of studies investigating if ASAD is more effective in selected subgroups of patients showed that clinical and radiological factors and patient characteristics such as sociodemographic, duration of symptoms and duration of sick leave, were associated with the effect of treatment. In addition, psychological factors are reported to impact outcome in both shoulder patients, and other orthopaedic patients. A preoperative scoring system to select patients for ASAD has been developed. However, this focuses on clinical and radiographic factors, and does not consider patient characteristics and psychological factors. Knowledge about predictors for the effect of ASAD in a broader perspective will be of great importance, from both a patient- and an economic perspective.
Aim: The overall aim of the study is to identify patient characteristic and clinical and psychological factors that preoperatively can predict which patients will achieve effect of ASAD. Furthermore, to investigate the quality of objective methods to assess shoulder function, and the association between patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and objective outcome measures.
Power considerations: Based on data extracted from the Central Denmark Region Electronic Patient Journal (Mid EPJ) an estimation of 150 patients annually undergo ASAD at Aarhus University Hospital. With a planned inclusion period of two years and a drop out rate of 10%, it means that 270 patients will be included. Using an estimate of 20% it is expected that 54 out of 270 patients will not benefit from ASAD. The number of patients without the effect of ASAD will affect the number of potential predictors that can be analyzed.
Outcome assessment: Effect of surgical treatment will be assessed with two instruments: 1) patient evaluated success of treatment with the response options: much improved, moderate improved, unchanged, moderate worse, and much worse and 2) the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS). Effect of surgical treatment will be defined as a much - or moderate improvement evaluated by the patient, or an improvement of more than 12 points in OSS between baseline and follow-up. The 12 point criterion is previous used to develop a preoperative scoring system to select patients for ASAD.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arthroscopic subacromial decompression
Patients referred to arthroscopic subacromial decompression
Arthroscopic subacromial decompression
Arthroscopic subacromial decompression
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Arthroscopic subacromial decompression
Arthroscopic subacromial decompression
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous surgical treatment in the affected shoulder
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Aarhus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Annemette Krintel Petersen, Ph.D
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Dept. of Clinical Medicine, Aaarhus University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dept of Orthopaedic Surgery and dept. of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LSskulder
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.