Cognitive Behavioural Therapy to Reduce Persistent Post-Surgical Pain After Fracture
NCT ID: NCT03196258
Last Updated: 2020-02-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
8 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-10-01
2019-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy to Optimize Post-Operative Recovery Trial
NCT04274530
Trial of Social Work Services in Fracture Clinic Setting
NCT06973655
Pilot Study Comparing Two Techniques of Taking Care Analgesic in Patients 70 and Older, Awaiting Surgery After Extracapsular Fracture of the Proximal Femur
NCT03185663
Early Standardized Weight Bearing Utilizing Immersion Therapy Following Periarticular Lower Extremity Fractures
NCT01457326
Immediate Weight-Bearing Ankle Study
NCT03032653
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The relationship between psychological factors, behaviors, and cognitive processes and the sensation of pain is well documented. Stress, distress, anxiety, depression, catastrophizing, fear-avoidance behaviors, and poor coping strategies appear to have a significant positive relationship with both acute and chronic pain. Evidence suggests that these psychological factors can cause alterations along the spinal and supraspinal pain pathways which influence the perception of pain. Previous studies suggest that patients' beliefs and expectations may be associated with clinical outcomes, including self-reported pain.
Clinical outcomes following operatively managed fractures of the extremities are variable and many patients continue to experience persistent pain and disability one-year after surgery and beyond. In a recent trial involving patients with open extremity fractures, 65% of patients reported moderate to very severe pain and 35% reported moderate to extreme pain interference at one-year. A systematic review of 20 observational studies of traumatic tibial fracture repairs found the mean incidence of persistent post-surgical pain (PPSP) was 47.4% (range: 10% to 86%) at an average of 23.9 months after surgery. Although several risk factors for PPSP have been identified, many, such as younger age and female gender, are non-modifiable and thus not amendable to direct intervention.
The effect of patients' beliefs and expectations on their recovery following traumatic injuries is an under-investigated area. In response to this gap, Busse et al. developed and evaluated the Somatic Pre-Occupation and Coping (SPOC) questionnaire to identify unhelpful illness beliefs that are predictive of poorer functional outcomes post-fracture. This self-administered questionnaire identified unhelpful illness beliefs among approximately one third of patients with operatively managed extremity fractures. Furthermore, high somatic pre-occupation and poor coping at 6-weeks post-fracture (as measured by the SPOC questionnaire) were found to be strongly associated with PPSP, functional limitations, unemployment, and reduced quality of life 1 year after fracture fixation. This suggests the possibility that fracture patients who exhibit unhelpful illness beliefs can be identified and targeted for concurrent therapy designed to modify such cognitions and improve prognosis. At present, however, there are no approaches that have been shown effective for improving recovery among high-risk patients.
The findings from the FLOW trial highlight the importance of patient beliefs in recovery from orthopaedic trauma. A number of systematic reviews have shown patients' perceptions regarding their illness experience can be modified, and that such efforts can improve outcomes. Moss-Morris and colleagues explored the effect of CBT among patients attending a multidisciplinary chronic pain clinic and found that changes in cognitive processes accounted for 26% of the variation in improved health-related quality of life scores. Collectively, these findings suggest that targeting and modifying unhelpful beliefs through CBT may provide an effective strategy to improve outcomes among high-risk trauma patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
intervention - CBT
Participants in this arm will receive 6 weekly one-on-one, 1-hour sessions of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy session (intervention) in addition to receiving standard of care treatment for their fracture(s).
Cognitive behavioural therapy
Participants who are randomized to the CBT intervention are required to start CBT within 8 weeks of their fracture surgery. The CBT intervention will consist of 6 weekly one-on-one, 1-hour sessions that will focus on addressing maladaptive beliefs related to pain and recovery as well as teaching skills to enhance coping and management of pain symptoms. The specific focus of CBT sessions will be informed by each individual patient's responses on the SPOC questionnaire. All other aspects of post-operative care will be at the discretion of participant's surgeon
control
Participants in the control arm of the study will receive standard of care treatment for their fracture(s) but will not receive any Cognitive Behavioral Therapy.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cognitive behavioural therapy
Participants who are randomized to the CBT intervention are required to start CBT within 8 weeks of their fracture surgery. The CBT intervention will consist of 6 weekly one-on-one, 1-hour sessions that will focus on addressing maladaptive beliefs related to pain and recovery as well as teaching skills to enhance coping and management of pain symptoms. The specific focus of CBT sessions will be informed by each individual patient's responses on the SPOC questionnaire. All other aspects of post-operative care will be at the discretion of participant's surgeon
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Acute open or closed fracture(s) of the appendicular skeleton. Patients with multiple fractures may be included.
3. Fracture treated operatively with internal fixation.
4. Screened for eligibility within 6 weeks of their fracture.
5. Cognitive ability and language skills required to participate in the CBT intervention (in the judgement of site research personnel).
6. Able to start the CBT within 8 weeks of their fracture surgery.
7. Provision of informed consent.
8. Screen positive for unhelpful illness beliefs (SPOC scores ≥74), as assessed at 6 weeks' post-surgical fixation.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Stress fracture.
3. Concomitant injury which, in the opinion of the attending surgeon, is likely to impair function for as long as or longer than the patient's extremity fracture.
4. Active psychosis.
5. Active suicidality.
6. Active substance use disorder that, in the judgement of the treating surgeon, would interfere in the patient's ability to partake in the CBT and/or the study.
7. Already participating in, or planning to start other psychological treatments (including CBT) within the duration of the study (12 months).
8. Anticipated problems with the patient attending CBT sessions and/or returning for follow-up.
9. Incarceration.
10. Other reason to exclude the patient, as specified.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hamilton Academic Health Sciences Organization
OTHER
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
OTHER
Unity Health Toronto
OTHER
McMaster University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St. Joseph Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Moulin DE, Clark AJ, Speechley M, Morley-Forster PK. Chronic pain in Canada--prevalence, treatment, impact and the role of opioid analgesia. Pain Res Manag. 2002 Winter;7(4):179-84. doi: 10.1155/2002/323085.
Johannes CB, Le TK, Zhou X, Johnston JA, Dworkin RH. The prevalence of chronic pain in United States adults: results of an Internet-based survey. J Pain. 2010 Nov;11(11):1230-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.07.002. Epub 2010 Aug 25.
Blyth FM, March LM, Brnabic AJ, Jorm LR, Williamson M, Cousins MJ. Chronic pain in Australia: a prevalence study. Pain. 2001 Jan;89(2-3):127-34. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00355-9.
Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006 May;10(4):287-333. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009. Epub 2005 Aug 10.
Elliott AM, Smith BH, Penny KI, Smith WC, Chambers WA. The epidemiology of chronic pain in the community. Lancet. 1999 Oct 9;354(9186):1248-52. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)03057-3.
Crombie IK, Davies HT, Macrae WA. Cut and thrust: antecedent surgery and trauma among patients attending a chronic pain clinic. Pain. 1998 May;76(1-2):167-71.
Linton SJ. A review of psychological risk factors in back and neck pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 May 1;25(9):1148-56. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200005010-00017.
Wiech K, Tracey I. The influence of negative emotions on pain: behavioral effects and neural mechanisms. Neuroimage. 2009 Sep;47(3):987-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.059. Epub 2009 May 28.
Mondloch MV, Cole DC, Frank JW. Does how you do depend on how you think you'll do? A systematic review of the evidence for a relation between patients' recovery expectations and health outcomes. CMAJ. 2001 Jul 24;165(2):174-9.
Ebrahim S, Malachowski C, Kamal El Din M, Mulla SM, Montoya L, Bance S, Busse JW. Measures of patients' expectations about recovery: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2015 Mar;25(1):240-55. doi: 10.1007/s10926-014-9535-4.
Sprague S, Leece P, Bhandari M, Tornetta P 3rd, Schemitsch E, Swiontkowski MF; S.P.R.I.N.T. Investigators. Limiting loss to follow-up in a multicenter randomized trial in orthopedic surgery. Control Clin Trials. 2003 Dec;24(6):719-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2003.08.012.
Montes A, Roca G, Sabate S, Lao JI, Navarro A, Cantillo J, Canet J; GENDOLCAT Study Group. Genetic and Clinical Factors Associated with Chronic Postsurgical Pain after Hernia Repair, Hysterectomy, and Thoracotomy: A Two-year Multicenter Cohort Study. Anesthesiology. 2015 May;122(5):1123-41. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000611.
Perkins FM, Kehlet H. Chronic pain as an outcome of surgery. A review of predictive factors. Anesthesiology. 2000 Oct;93(4):1123-33. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200010000-00038. No abstract available.
Busse JW, Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Heels-Ansdell D, Kulkarni AV, Mandel S, Sanders D, Schemitsch E, Swiontkowski M, Tornetta P 3rd, Wai E, Walter SD; SPRINT Investigators & the Medically Unexplained Syndromes Study Group. Development and validation of an instrument to predict functional recovery in tibial fracture patients: the Somatic Pre-Occupation and Coping (SPOC) questionnaire. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 Jun;26(6):370-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31822421e2.
Reininga IH, Brouwer S, Dijkstra A, Busse JW, Ebrahim S, Wendt KW, El Moumni M. Measuring illness beliefs in patients with lower extremity injuries: reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Somatic Pre-Occupation and Coping questionnaire (SPOC-NL). Injury. 2015 Feb;46(2):308-14. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.042. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
Bhandari M, Petrisor BA, Jeray KJ. Wound Irrigation in Initial Management of Open Fractures. N Engl J Med. 2016 May 5;374(18):1789-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1601157. No abstract available.
Brodke DJ, Saltzman CL, Brodke DS. PROMIS for Orthopaedic Outcomes Measurement. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016 Nov;24(11):744-749. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00404.
Werner MU, Kongsgaard UE. I. Defining persistent post-surgical pain: is an update required? Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jul;113(1):1-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu012. Epub 2014 Feb 18. No abstract available.
Tan G, Jensen MP, Thornby JI, Shanti BF. Validation of the Brief Pain Inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain. J Pain. 2004 Mar;5(2):133-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2003.12.005.
Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.
Khan JS, Devereaux PJ, LeManach Y, Busse JW. Patient coping and expectations about recovery predict the development of chronic post-surgical pain after traumatic tibial fracture repair. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Sep;117(3):365-70. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew225.
Lin CA, Swiontkowski M, Bhandari M, Walter SD, Schemitsch EH, Sanders D, Tornetta P 3rd. Reaming Does Not Affect Functional Outcomes After Open and Closed Tibial Shaft Fractures: The Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Mar;30(3):142-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000497.
Katsoulis E, Court-Brown C, Giannoudis PV. Incidence and aetiology of anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of the femur and tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 May;88(5):576-80. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B5.16875. No abstract available.
Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet. 2006 May 13;367(9522):1618-25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68700-X.
MacKenzie EJ, Bosse MJ, Kellam JF, Pollak AN, Webb LX, Swiontkowski MF, Smith DG, Sanders RW, Jones AL, Starr AJ, McAndrew MP, Patterson BM, Burgess AR, Travison T, Castillo RC. Early predictors of long-term work disability after major limb trauma. J Trauma. 2006 Sep;61(3):688-94. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000195985.56153.68.
Wegener ST, Castillo RC, Haythornthwaite J, MacKenzie EJ, Bosse MJ; LEAP Study Group. Psychological distress mediates the effect of pain on function. Pain. 2011 Jun;152(6):1349-1357. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.02.020. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
Vranceanu AM, Bachoura A, Weening A, Vrahas M, Smith RM, Ring D. Psychological factors predict disability and pain intensity after skeletal trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Feb 5;96(3):e20. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00479.
Treede RD, Rief W, Barke A, Aziz Q, Bennett MI, Benoliel R, Cohen M, Evers S, Finnerup NB, First MB, Giamberardino MA, Kaasa S, Kosek E, Lavand'homme P, Nicholas M, Perrot S, Scholz J, Schug S, Smith BH, Svensson P, Vlaeyen JWS, Wang SJ. A classification of chronic pain for ICD-11. Pain. 2015 Jun;156(6):1003-1007. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000160. No abstract available.
Fries JF, Bruce B, Cella D. The promise of PROMIS: using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005 Sep-Oct;23(5 Suppl 39):S53-7.
Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G. Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Aug;45(4):384-91. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200108)45:43.0.CO;2-0.
Jenkinson C, Stewart-Brown S, Petersen S, Paice C. Assessment of the SF-36 version 2 in the United Kingdom. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Jan;53(1):46-50. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.1.46.
Fixation using Alternative Implants for the Treatment of Hip fractures (FAITH) Investigators. Fracture fixation in the operative management of hip fractures (FAITH): an international, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017 Apr 15;389(10078):1519-1527. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30066-1. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
Madden K, Scott T, McKay P, Petrisor BA, Jeray KJ, Tanner SL, Bhandari M, Sprague S. Predicting and Preventing Loss to Follow-up of Adult Trauma Patients in Randomized Controlled Trials: An Example from the FLOW Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jul 5;99(13):1086-1092. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00900.
Zhang Y, Alyass A, Vanniyasingam T, Sadeghirad B, Florez ID, Pichika SC, Kennedy SA, Abdulkarimova U, Zhang Y, Iljon T, Morgano GP, Colunga Lozano LE, Aloweni FAB, Lopes LC, Yepes-Nunez JJ, Fei Y, Wang L, Kahale LA, Meyre D, Akl EA, Thabane L, Guyatt GH. A systematic survey of the methods literature on the reporting quality and optimal methods of handling participants with missing outcome data for continuous outcomes in randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Aug;88:67-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.05.016. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
Thabane L, Mbuagbaw L, Zhang S, Samaan Z, Marcucci M, Ye C, Thabane M, Giangregorio L, Dennis B, Kosa D, Borg Debono V, Dillenburg R, Fruci V, Bawor M, Lee J, Wells G, Goldsmith CH. A tutorial on sensitivity analyses in clinical trials: the what, why, when and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Jul 16;13:92. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-92.
Sprague S, Petrisor BA, Jeray KJ, McKay P, Scott T, Heels-Ansdell D, Schemitsch EH, Liew S, Guyatt GH, Walter SD, Bhandari M. Factors Associated With Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Open Fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Jan;32(1):e5-e11. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000993.
Archer KR, Abraham CM, Obremskey WT. Psychosocial Factors Predict Pain and Physical Health After Lower Extremity Trauma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Nov;473(11):3519-26. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4504-6.
Sun X, Briel M, Walter SD, Guyatt GH. Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses. BMJ. 2010 Mar 30;340:c117. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c117. No abstract available.
Briggs AH, O'Brien BJ, Blackhouse G. Thinking outside the box: recent advances in the analysis and presentation of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness studies. Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23:377-401. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.100901.140534. Epub 2001 Oct 25.
Briel M, Lane M, Montori VM, Bassler D, Glasziou P, Malaga G, Akl EA, Ferreira-Gonzalez I, Alonso-Coello P, Urrutia G, Kunz R, Culebro CR, da Silva SA, Flynn DN, Elamin MB, Strahm B, Murad MH, Djulbegovic B, Adhikari NK, Mills EJ, Gwadry-Sridhar F, Kirpalani H, Soares HP, Abu Elnour NO, You JJ, Karanicolas PJ, Bucher HC, Lampropulos JF, Nordmann AJ, Burns KE, Mulla SM, Raatz H, Sood A, Kaur J, Bankhead CR, Mullan RJ, Nerenberg KA, Vandvik PO, Coto-Yglesias F, Schunemann H, Tuche F, Chrispim PP, Cook DJ, Lutz K, Ribic CM, Vale N, Erwin PJ, Perera R, Zhou Q, Heels-Ansdell D, Ramsay T, Walter SD, Guyatt GH. Stopping randomized trials early for benefit: a protocol of the Study Of Trial Policy Of Interim Truncation-2 (STOPIT-2). Trials. 2009 Jul 6;10:49. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-49.
Montori VM, Devereaux PJ, Adhikari NK, Burns KE, Eggert CH, Briel M, Lacchetti C, Leung TW, Darling E, Bryant DM, Bucher HC, Schunemann HJ, Meade MO, Cook DJ, Erwin PJ, Sood A, Sood R, Lo B, Thompson CA, Zhou Q, Mills E, Guyatt GH. Randomized trials stopped early for benefit: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005 Nov 2;294(17):2203-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.17.2203.
Gouveia K, Sprague S, Gallant J, Del Fabbro G, Leonard J, Bzovsky S, McKay P, Busse JW; COPE Investigators. In-person cognitive behavioural therapy vs. usual care after surgical management of extremity fractures: an unsuccessful feasibility trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Jan 6;10(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01430-y.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
28\. Hamner J, Dewitt B. The Development of a Preference-based Scoring System for PROMIS (PROPr): A Technical Report v 1.1. \[Internet\] 2017;available from: http://janelhanmer.pitt.edu/documents/technicalreportv1.1.pdf (accessed August 29, 2017).
Wang L, Chang Y, Kennedy SA, Hong PJ, Chow N, Coubon R et al. Perioperative Psychotherapy for Persistent Post-Surgical Pain and Physical Impairment: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. Br J Anaesth. 2017;\[in review\]
25\. Järvinen TLN, Sihvonen R, Bhandari M, Sprague S, Malmivaara A, Paavola M et al. Blinded interpretation of study results can feasibly and effectively diminish interpretation bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:769-772
Hamner J, Dewitt B. The Development of a Preference-based Scoring System for PROMIS (PROPr): A Technical Report v 1.1 \[internet\] 2017; available from: http//janelhanmer.pitt.edu/documents/technicalreportv1.1.pdf (accessed August 29, 2017)
33\. Busse JW, Bhandari M, Einhorn TA, Schemitsch E, Heckman JD, Tornetta P, 3rd, et al. Re-evaluation of low intensity pulsed ultrasound in treatment of tibial fractures (TRUST): randomized clinical trial. Bmj. 2016;355:i5351
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SPOC-CBT-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.