Vertebral Body Tethering Outcomes for Pediatric Idiopathic Scoliosis
NCT ID: NCT03194568
Last Updated: 2024-09-23
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-07-12
2022-01-26
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Casting Vs Bracing for Idiopathic Early-Onset Scoliosis
NCT04500041
Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation for Children and Youth With Spina Bifida
NCT06918119
Robotic vs. Freehand Corrective Surgery for Pediatric Scoliosis
NCT02084264
Guided Growth Technique Use In Treatment Of Hip Sublaxation In CP Childern
NCT06983353
The Effect of Flexible Thoracolumbar Brace on Scoliosis in Cerebral Palsy
NCT04012125
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
If treated with a TLSO brace, many idiopathic scoliosis patients would conceivably be subjected to years of brace wear and the cost and psychological factors inherent therein. Additional downsides of brace treatment include the potentially negative psychosocial impact of wearing an external sign of deformity during adolescence, a key period of emotional development. Prior research has identified negative psychosocial effects related to wearing a brace in children.
Recent evidence has suggested that certain curve patterns will likely progress to 50 degrees or more, despite treatment with a TLSO brace. Sanders, et al. demonstrated a correlation of Cobb angle (greater than 35 degrees) and skeletal maturity (bone age 4 or less) to the risk of progression to 50 degrees or more, despite TLSO bracing. The evidence supports that the current practice of TLSO bracing is not an effective treatment to avoid progression to 50 degrees in these patients. It is on this population (thoracic Cobb angle greater than 35 degrees, bone age of 4 or less) that we intend to test the safety and feasibility of Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering to avoid curve progression to 50 degrees.
The study intervention is surgical orthopedic implantation of the Anterior Vertebral Tether Device, by way of thoracoscopic surgery under general anesthesia. The primary outcome measures include assessments of safety of the insertion procedure and of the device, as well as the secondary measure of feasibility by determining the ability to successfully implant the investigational device.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Anterior Vertebral Tethering
Subjects receiving Anterior Vertebral Tethering intervention.
Anterior Vertebral Tether
Vertebral body tethering through anterior thoracoscopic approach under general anesthesia and fluoroscopic guidance.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Anterior Vertebral Tether
Vertebral body tethering through anterior thoracoscopic approach under general anesthesia and fluoroscopic guidance.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Diagnosis of idiopathic scoliosis
3. Sanders bone age of less than or equal to 4
4. Thoracic curve of greater than or equal to 35 degrees and less than or equal to 60 degrees
5. Lumbar curve less than 35 degrees
6. Patient has already been identified for and recommended to have surgical intervention
7. Spina bifida occulta is permitted
8. Spondylolysis or Spondylolisthesis is permitted, as long as it is non-operative, the subject has not had any previous surgery for this, and no surgery is planned in the future
Exclusion Criteria
2. Prior spinal or chest surgery
3. MRI abnormalities (including syrinx greater than 4mm, Chiari malformation, or tethered cord)
4. Neuromuscular, thoracogenic, cardiogenic scoliosis, or any other non-idiopathic scoliosis
5. Associated syndrome, including Marfan syndrome or neurofibromatosis
6. Sanders bone age greater than 4
7. Thoracic curve less than 35 degrees or greater than 60 degrees
8. Lumbar curve greater than or equal to 35 degrees
9. Unable or unwilling to firmly commit to returning for required follow-up visits
10. Investigator judgement that the subject/family may not be a candidate for the intervention
8 Years
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Patrick Cahill, MD
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Patrick Cahill, MD
Attending Orthopaedic Surgeon
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Patrick Cahill, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
17-013694
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.