Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-12-21
2023-06-06
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Single-session tDCS in Cerebral Palsy
NCT03635775
Enhancing Motor Plasticity After Perinatal Stroke Using tDCS
NCT02170285
Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Motor Learning in Children With Cerebral Palsy (CP)
NCT01852474
Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Pediatric Hemiparesis
NCT01636661
Effects Obtained at Manual Function After Applying Anodic Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tCDS) in Children With Spastic Hemiparetic Cerebral Palsy
NCT06438666
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
An estimated 3.6 per 1,000 births in the United States are affected by stroke or brain bleeds which can lead to Cerebral Palsy (CP), a developmental disorder associated with motor impairment. While, the majority of rehabilitation approaches focus on behavioral repetition to improve gait and upper extremity function, these therapies can require extensive practice times and extent of recovery is variable. Thus, there is a need for novel strategies which can optimize rehabilitation outcomes for this population. Brain development during childhood is characterized by heighted neuroplastic potential stressing the importance for intervention methods that harness neuroplasticity. Accordingly, several therapies are theoretically based in mechanisms of motor learning and use-dependent plasticity.
Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), specifically transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), provides an approach for modulation of neuroplasticity that is safe, inexpensive, and portable. Furthermore, rehabilitation approaches combined with tDCS have shown promise to improve motor function recovery and quality of life after stroke in adults. Integrating the application of NIBS may allow for enhanced rehabilitation during the enhanced neuroplastic period of childhood and NIBS has demonstrated promising outcomes in increasing the rate and extent of recovery.
The Pediatric Neuromodulation laboratory has shown that in children with CP the use of tDCS is safe, feasible, and successful at modifying motor performance when in combination with other physical therapy interventions. tDCS is not currently available to subjects without taking part in the study. In this study, investigators plan to administer tDCS in the remote setting during a synchronous zoom call with trained laboratory members. To ensure the device is safely used in the home setting only during designated times, in the presence of a trained safety monitor. The safety monitor will bring the device to the session, oversee the safety of its use, and take it back to the laboratory after the session is complete.
This intervention has the potential to improve motor rehabilitation outcomes and can offer telehealth access, which may reduce treatment cost and improve access to limited access to clinic or hospital facilities. This study has the potential to set the foundation for larger clinical trials studies evaluating the efficacy of remote tDCS combined with rehabilitation interventions in children. Ultimately, this will contribute to a wider reach in improving quality of life across the lifespan in children with CP.
On Day #1 there will be a practice stimulation montage setup assessment. Before their session, a GMFCS and pediatric cognition survey will be completed with the investigative team. All participants will be asked to view instructional videos on how to perform the procedures.
Parent/child pairs will perform the assessment by walking through the steps with the guidance of the lab team member via videoconferencing. Efficiency and quality of setup data will be collected. A setup ease/comfort survey will be completed upon completion of the stimulation montage setup. Days 2-5 will consist of sham/active stimulation in the home setting under caregiver, safety monitor, and remote investigator supervision and direction. Status surveys inquiring well-being will be conducted before, during, and after stimulation as well as a Box and Blocks motor function tests. At any time the participant perceives discomfort while dosing to 1.5mA the investigators will adapt and modify the stimulation intensity.
Protocol Amendment Approved 6/7/2023: addition of an optional 6 and 12 month study visit.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Children diagnosed with stroke/brain bleed
Male and females aged 8 to 21 with established diagnosis of stroke/brain bleed who are US residents.
Soterix 1x1 tDCS LTE Stimulator Device Model 1401
Participants will receive 20 minutes of 1.5 mA (Milliampere) transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) via Soterix 1x1 tDCS LTE Stimulator Device Model 1401 with a bilateral M1 montage.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Soterix 1x1 tDCS LTE Stimulator Device Model 1401
Participants will receive 20 minutes of 1.5 mA (Milliampere) transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) via Soterix 1x1 tDCS LTE Stimulator Device Model 1401 with a bilateral M1 montage.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Children who have hemiparetic cerebral palsy with a history of perinatal brain bleed/stroke
* Receptive language function to follow two-step commands
* Able to give informed assent along with the informed consent of the legal guardian. If the participant is 18-21 (with the capacity to consent), they must be able to give informed consent.
* Intentional about representing the sub-population of children with CP who experience intellectual disability (at least 2/10 participants with mild intellectual disabilities will be recruited)
* ≥ 10 degrees of active motion at the metacarpophalangeal joint
* Children who have had surgeries, which may influence motor function e.g.- tendon transfer, will be included, yet surgical history will be documented and included in any publication within a participant characteristics table.
Exclusion Criteria
* Implants
* Neoplasm
* Metabolic Disorders
* Epilepsy
* Seizure within two years preceding the study
* Acquired Traumatic Brain Injury
* Pregnancy
* Indwelling metal or incompatible medical devices
* Evidence of skin disease or skin abnormalities
* Botulinum toxin or Phenol block within \[six-months\] preceding the study
* Disorder of Cellular Migration and Proliferation
To be eligible for the optional 6-month/12-month follow-up:
* participants must have previously participated in the primary study
* have access to a reliable internet connection and a functioning computer, laptop, or mobile device.
* If participants become pregnant after participating in primary study, they may participate in the 6- and 12-month follow up sessions
8 Years
21 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Wisconsin, Madison
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bernadette Gillick, PhD, MSPT
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lench DH, Simpson E, Sutter EN, Gillick BT. Feasibility of remote transcranial direct current stimulation for pediatric cerebral palsy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Brain Stimul. 2020 Nov-Dec;13(6):1803-1804. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Oct 23. No abstract available.
Christopher P, Sutter EN, Gavioli M, Lench DH, Nytes G, Mak V, Simpson EA, Ikonomidou C, Villegas MA, Saiote C, Gillick BT. Safety, tolerability and feasibility of remotely-instructed home-based transcranial direct current stimulation in children with cerebral palsy. Brain Stimul. 2023 Sep-Oct;16(5):1325-1327. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.08.024. Epub 2023 Aug 29. No abstract available.
Simpson EA, Saiote C, Sutter E, Lench DH, Ikonomidou C, Villegas MA, Gillick BT. Remotely monitored transcranial direct current stimulation in pediatric cerebral palsy: open label trial protocol. BMC Pediatr. 2022 Sep 29;22(1):566. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03612-8.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Protocol ver 8 5/4/2023
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
Development Pediatrics
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2021-0691
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.