Robotic vs. Freehand Corrective Surgery for Pediatric Scoliosis
NCT ID: NCT02084264
Last Updated: 2019-08-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
272 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-10-31
2019-07-08
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prospective Database Registry Study of Scoliosis in Children With Cerebral Palsy
NCT00680264
Effect of Global Postural Re-education in Idiopathic Scoliosis
NCT03663088
Vertebral Body Tethering Outcomes for Pediatric Idiopathic Scoliosis
NCT03194568
The Effect of Flexible Thoracolumbar Brace on Scoliosis in Cerebral Palsy
NCT04012125
Manual Therapy and Virtual Reality Supported in Patient With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
NCT05861856
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm 1: Robotic-guided, open approach
Robotic-guided, open approach
No interventions assigned to this group
Arm 2: control arm- non-robotic, open approach
control arm- non-robotic, open approach°
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patient capable of complying with study requirements
3. Signed informed consent by patient
Exclusion Criteria
2. Infection or malignancy
3. Primary abnormalities of bones (e.g. osteogenesis imperfecta)
4. Primary muscle diseases, such as muscular dystrophy
5. Neurologic diseases (e.g. Charcot-Marie Tooth, Guillain-Barre syndrome, cerebral palsy, spina bifida, or neurofibroma)
6. Spinal cord abnormalities with any neurologic symptoms or signs
7. Spinal cord lesions requiring neurosurgical interventions, such as hydromyelia
8. Patients who have participated in a research study involving an investigational product in the 12 weeks prior to surgery
9. Patients requiring anterior release or instrumentation
10. Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study.
11. Pregnancy
12. Patient cannot follow study protocol, for any reason
13. Patient cannot or will not sign informed consent
10 Years
21 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mazor Robotics
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Doron Dinstein, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Mazor Robotics
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Rady Children's Hospital- San Diego
San Diego, California, United States
Florida Hospital for Children
Orlando, Florida, United States
Children's Healtchare of Atlanta at Scottish Rite
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Geisinger Orthopaedic Institute
Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Devito DP, Kaplan L, Dietl R, Pfeiffer M, Horne D, Silberstein B, Hardenbrook M, Kiriyanthan G, Barzilay Y, Bruskin A, Sackerer D, Alexandrovsky V, Stuer C, Burger R, Maeurer J, Donald GD, Schoenmayr R, Friedlander A, Knoller N, Schmieder K, Pechlivanis I, Kim IS, Meyer B, Shoham M. Clinical acceptance and accuracy assessment of spinal implants guided with SpineAssist surgical robot: retrospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Nov 15;35(24):2109-15. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d323ab.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CLN108
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.