Endovascular Revascularization for Chronic Carotid Artery Occlusion Trial

NCT ID: NCT03179774

Last Updated: 2025-07-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-05-17

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Revascularization for carotid artery occlusion (CAO) remained controversial, there is no prospective randomized control trial (RCT) regarding carotid artery stenting (CAS) in CAO patients. The investigators conduct a prospective study composed of clinical registry arm and RCT arm. The main purpose of the study is investigate neurocognitive function at 3 months and thereafter up to 12 months.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Carotid artery stenosis is an important cause of stroke. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) provides non-inferior clinical outcome comparing to carotid endarterectomy (CEA). However, revascularization for carotid artery occlusion (CAO) remained controversial, owing to failed extracranial-to-intracranial (EC-IC) artery bypass trials, anatomical hindrance for CEA, and technical limitation for CAS. In the past 10 years, the investigators devoted in endovascular therapy for CAO and published innovative and pilot study results regarding feasibility of CAS for CAO, neurocognitive function (NCF) improvement after successful CAS for CAO, and predictors for CAS success in CAO, all in high-ranking journals. Moreover, successful CAS for CAO would lead to lower mortality and stroke rate during long-term follow-up, according to the preliminary analysis from the investigators. However, there is no prospective randomized control trial (RCT) regarding CAS in CAO patients, and in fact, most of the CAS trials excluded CAO.

The investigators, with the largest volume and experience in CAO recanalization in the world, felt obliged and responsible to propose the following RCT to evaluate endovascular revascularization for chronic CAO.

The study composed of two parts. The first part composed of prospective clinical registry for CAO. The second part compose of a prospective superiority trial, rater blinded, with 1:1 randomization to evaluate the clinical efficacy of interventional therapy for CAO. Eligible candidates for CAO revealed by CT, ultrasonography, angiography, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with abnormal brain perfusion demonstrated by CT perfusion study (CTP) or MRI, will be enrolled in to study. If the participants agreed for randomization, participants will be randomized into 2 groups: the optimal medical therapy (OMT) group and the endovascular revascularization plus optimal medical therapy (ER+OMT) group. The primary end-point of the trial is the NCF improvement at 3 months and thereafter up to 12 months. The secondary endpoint includes: cumulative incidence of death and stroke within 30 days after the procedure; death or ipsilateral stroke between 31 days and 1 year; major stroke, ischemic stroke, or hemorrhagic stroke within 30 days after the procedure; major stroke, ischemic stroke, or hemorrhagic stroke between 31 days and 1 year; cognitive function measured by CANTAB; change of cerebral perfusion measured by CTP; target vessel revascularization rate; technique success rate; procedure success rate; and major procedure complication.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Carotid Occlusion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Part 1: Clinical registry study (Optimal medical therapy group vs. Endovascular revascularization and optimal medical therapy) Part 2: Randomized control trial (Optimal medical therapy group vs. Endovascular revascularization and optimal medical therapy)
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Clinical registry-ER and OMT

In clinical registry setting, participants who selected Endovascular revascularization and optimal medical therapy as the treatment for carotid artery occlusion are enrolled.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Endovascular revascularization

Intervention Type DEVICE

All interventions will be performed via 8F femoral sheath. Target common carotid artery will be engaged with 8F JR 4 guiding catheter. Intra-luminal wiring using coronary guidewires and microcatheters or alternative subintimal tracking with antegrade re-entry technique. Wiring would be abandoned after 30 minutes of futile effort, consumption of more than 300 ml of contrast, or when the wire tip is confirmed to be extravascular. Once wire enters distal true lumen, the microcatheter was exchanged to a 1.5 mm diameter coronary balloon for pre-dilatation. Distal embolic protection device would be deployed if an adequate landing zone can be identified. Properly sized balloon expandable stents and self-expanding stents were then deployed to scaffold the occlusion. Balloon post-dilatation may be done if stent expansion was inadequate.

Clinical registry-OMT

In clinical registry setting, participants who selected optimal medical therapy as the treatment for carotid artery occlusion are enrolled.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

RCT-ER and OMT

In randomized control trial setting, participants who are randomized to received endovascular revascularization and optimal medical therapy for carotid artery occlusion are enrolled.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Endovascular revascularization

Intervention Type DEVICE

All interventions will be performed via 8F femoral sheath. Target common carotid artery will be engaged with 8F JR 4 guiding catheter. Intra-luminal wiring using coronary guidewires and microcatheters or alternative subintimal tracking with antegrade re-entry technique. Wiring would be abandoned after 30 minutes of futile effort, consumption of more than 300 ml of contrast, or when the wire tip is confirmed to be extravascular. Once wire enters distal true lumen, the microcatheter was exchanged to a 1.5 mm diameter coronary balloon for pre-dilatation. Distal embolic protection device would be deployed if an adequate landing zone can be identified. Properly sized balloon expandable stents and self-expanding stents were then deployed to scaffold the occlusion. Balloon post-dilatation may be done if stent expansion was inadequate.

RCT-OMT

In randomized control trial setting, participants who are randomized to received optimal medical therapy for carotid artery occlusion are enrolled.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endovascular revascularization

All interventions will be performed via 8F femoral sheath. Target common carotid artery will be engaged with 8F JR 4 guiding catheter. Intra-luminal wiring using coronary guidewires and microcatheters or alternative subintimal tracking with antegrade re-entry technique. Wiring would be abandoned after 30 minutes of futile effort, consumption of more than 300 ml of contrast, or when the wire tip is confirmed to be extravascular. Once wire enters distal true lumen, the microcatheter was exchanged to a 1.5 mm diameter coronary balloon for pre-dilatation. Distal embolic protection device would be deployed if an adequate landing zone can be identified. Properly sized balloon expandable stents and self-expanding stents were then deployed to scaffold the occlusion. Balloon post-dilatation may be done if stent expansion was inadequate.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Carotid artery stenting

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient age 20 years or older
* Abnormal cerebral perfusion by CTP or MRI
* No medical history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) ipsilateral to the carotid occlusion within 90 days of randomization
* Women must not be of childbearing potential or, if of childbearing potential, have a negative pregnancy test prior to randomization.


* Patient age 20 years or older
* Abnormal cerebral perfusion by CTP or MRI
* No medical history of stroke or TIA ipsilateral to the carotid occlusion within 90 days of randomization
* Patients must have a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤2 at the time of informed consent.
* Women must not be of childbearing potential or, if of childbearing potential, have a negative pregnancy test prior to randomization.
* Randomization will apply to only 1 carotid artery occlusion for patients with bilateral carotid occlusion. Intervention of the contralateral stenosis, should it exists, may be done in according to clinical indications at least 30 days prior to randomization.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient has acute stroke within 90 days,
* Intolerance or allergic reaction to a study medication without a suitable management alternative.
* Patient is expected to have the ADP antagonist therapy interruption within 3 months after the procedure.
* GI hemorrhage within 1 month prior to enrollment that would preclude antiplatelet therapy
* Bleeding diathesis
* Intracranial hemorrhage within the past 12 months.
* Platelet count \<100,000/μl or history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
* Other high-risk cardiac sources of emboli, including left ventricular aneurysm, severe cardiomyopathy, aortic or mitral mechanical heart valve, severe calcific aortic stenosis (valve area \< 1.0 cm2), endocarditis, moderate to severe mitral stenosis, left atrial thrombus, or any intracardiac mass, or known unrepaired patent foramen ovale (PFO) with prior paradoxical embolism.
* Any major surgery, major trauma, revascularization procedure within the past 1 month.
* Acute coronary syndrome within the past 1 month or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) that is not amenable to revascularization (patients should undergo planned coronary revascularization at least 30 days before randomization).
* Inability to understand and cooperate with study procedures or provide informed consent.
* Patients with \< 5 years life expectancy
* Concomitant vascular conditions precluding endovascular revascularization procedure;
* Previous ipsilateral carotid artery stenting
* Intracranial aneurysm or arteriovenous malformation;
* Educational level lower than elementary school;
* Aphasia or right-sided hemiparesis
* Marked depression.
* Severe dementia.

Part 2: Randomized control study


* Patient has acute stroke within 90 days,
* Prior major ipsilateral stroke in the past with moderate disability (mRS ≥ 3) that is likely to confound study outcomes.
* Current neurologic illness characterized by fleeting or fixed neurologic deficits that cannot be distinguished from TIA or stroke.
* Patient has significant renal insufficiency with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<30 ml/min (at screening). and would not receive renal replacement therapy if contrast agent related nephropathy occurs
* Intolerance or allergic reaction to a study medication without a suitable management alternative.
* Patient is expected to have the ADP antagonist therapy interruption within 3 months after the procedure.
* GI hemorrhage within 1 month prior to enrollment that would preclude antiplatelet therapy
* Bleeding diathesis
* Intracranial hemorrhage within the past 12 months.
* Platelet count \<100,000/μl or history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
* Other high-risk cardiac sources of emboli, including left ventricular aneurysm, severe cardiomyopathy, aortic or mitral mechanical heart valve, severe calcific aortic stenosis (valve area \< 1.0 cm2), endocarditis, moderate to severe mitral stenosis, left atrial thrombus, or any intracardiac mass, or known unrepaired PFO with prior paradoxical embolism.
* Major (non-carotid) surgery/procedures planned within 3 months after enrollment.
* Any major surgery, major trauma, revascularization procedure within the past 1 month.
* Acute coronary syndrome within the past 1 month or ACS that is not amenable to revascularization (patients should undergo planned coronary revascularization at least 30 days before randomization).
* Coronary artery disease with two or more proximal or major diseased coronary arteries with ≥ 70% stenosis that have not, or cannot, be revascularized.
* Inability to understand and cooperate with study procedures or provide informed consent.
* Patients with \< 5 years life expectancy
* Concomitant vascular conditions precluding endovascular revascularization procedure;
* Previous ipsilateral carotid artery stenting
* Intracranial aneurysm or arteriovenous malformation;
* Educational level lower than elementary school;
* Aphasia or right-sided hemiparesis
* Marked depression.
* Severe dementia.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Taiwan University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hsien-Li Kao, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Taiwan University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Taiwan University Hospital

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Hsien-Li Kao, MD

Role: CONTACT

+886-2-2312-3456 ext. 65874

Ying-Hsien Chen, MD

Role: CONTACT

+886-972652463

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Hsien-Li Kao, MD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

201702049RINA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.