Early Prophylactic Decompressive Hemicraniectomy Following Endovascular Therapy in Large Hemispheric Infarct Trial
NCT ID: NCT07118345
Last Updated: 2026-01-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
380 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-07-19
2029-06-19
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
DHC is Underutilized: Despite evidence, clinical adoption remains low.Rescue DHC Fails to Improve Outcomes in Post-EVT MCE: Studies report poor functional outcomes (only 20% mRS 0-2) and high mortality (48.6%) with standard medical therapy (SMT) plus rescue DHC after MCE develops. Retrospective data confirms worse outcomes in these patients (mRS 0-2: 16.4% vs 50%; mortality: 46.5% vs 20%) compared to those without MCE. Crucially, rescue DHC itself fails to improve prognosis once MCE is established (mRS 5-6: 64% vs 57.7%; mortality: 48% vs 46.2%).High-Risk Identification: Patients defined as high-risk for MCE (ASPECTS 3-5 + NIHSS≥30 or ASPECTS≤2) have significantly worse 90-day outcomes (mRS 0-2: 23.2% vs 44.6%; mortality: 44% vs 22.7%).Timing is Critical: Rescue DHC is often performed too late, after irreversible neurological damage occurs. Early/Prophylactic DHC, performed before significant edema and herniation develop, offers a potential pathophysiological advantage. It may:Improve cerebral perfusion pressure earlier. Reduce mass effect and edema progression. Mitigate secondary injury (e.g., reduce oxygen-free radicals, excitatory amino acids).Potentially break the ischemic-edema-herniation cycle sooner.Rationale for the Study: While DHC is effective for established MCE in non-EVT contexts and rescue DHC post-EVT is ineffective, high-quality evidence for early prophylactic DHC in high-risk large-core patients after successful EVT is lacking. Current guidelines do not address this specific, high-risk population where MCE incidence is \~50% and outcomes are dismal despite recanalization.
Study Aim: This trial will evaluate the efficacy and safety of early prophylactic decompressive hemicraniectomy compared to standard medical treatment (which includes rescue DHC if MCE develops) in AIS-LVO patients at high risk of MCE (defined by ASPECTS and NIHSS criteria) following successful EVT. The goal is to determine if proactive intervention can improve functional outcomes and reduce mortality in this critically ill population where current strategies fail.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Thrombectomy Versus Best Medical Management in Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Patients Presenting Beyond 24 Hours and With Presence of Collateral Flow on CT Angiography
NCT06654375
Efficacy of Rescue Stenting/Angioplasty After Failed Thrombectomy for Acute Large Intracranial Vascular Occlusion
NCT07026344
Exploring Cerebrolysin in Late Thrombectomy for Stroke: Blood-brain Barrier Biomarkers and Imaging Insights
NCT06339411
Intracranial Thrombosis Aspiration Catheter for Recanalization in Acute Ischemic Stroke Therapy (RECOVER)
NCT03753061
Head-down Position for Acute Ischemic Stroke With Large Artery Atherosclerosis
NCT03744533
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental group
Early prophylactic decompressive hemicraniectomy
Early prophylactic decompressive hemicraniectomy
Early prophylactic decompressive hemicraniectomy (decompressive hemicraniectomy is required to initiate within 6 hours after completion of mechanical thrombectomy and within 4 hours after randomization).
Control group
Standard medical treatment (with or without rescue decompressive craniectomy if needed).
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Early prophylactic decompressive hemicraniectomy
Early prophylactic decompressive hemicraniectomy (decompressive hemicraniectomy is required to initiate within 6 hours after completion of mechanical thrombectomy and within 4 hours after randomization).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. ASPECTS 3-5 and NIHSS ≥ 30;
2. ASPECTS 0-2; 7.Signs on CT/MRI of an infarct of at least 50% of the middle cerebral artery territory; 8.No midline shift or midline shift \<5mm; 9.Mechanical Thrombectomy and successful recanalization (defined as eTICI ≥2b50); 10.Ability to initiate decompressive hemicraniectomy within 6 hours after completion of mechanical thrombectomy and within 4 hours after randomization; 11.Informed consent obtained from the patient or his/her legal representative.
Exclusion Criteria
2. In the judgment of the investigator, the subject is likely to have supportive care withdrawn in the first day.
3. Commitment to decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) prior to enrollment.
4. Severe, sustained hypertension (systolic blood pressure \> 220 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure \> 110 mm Hg);
5. Baseline blood glucose \<50 mg/dl (2.8 mmol/L) or \>400 mg/dl (22.2 mmol/L);
6. Baseline platelet count \<100 x10\^9/L;
7. Known hemorrhagic diathesis, coagulation factor deficiency, or oral anticoagulant therapy with international normalized ratio \> 1.7;
8. Severe renal insufficiency, defined as serum creatinine \> 3.0 mg/dl (or 265.2 μmol/l) or glomerular filtration rate \[GFR\] \< 30 ml/min, or patients requiring hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis;
9. Patients that cannot complete 90-day follow-up (such as no fixed residence, overseas patients, etc.);
10. Suspected vasculitis or septic embolism;
11. Neurological diseases or mental disorders before onset that affect the assessment of the condition;
12. Females who are pregnant or in lactation;
13. Participating in other clinical trials that could confound the evaluation of the study;
14. Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator, have a life expectancy \<3 months due to conditions not related to current LHI or are unlikely to comply with follow-up requirements. Other conditions that the investigators believe are not suitable for participation or may pose a significant risk to the patient.
1. Evidence of other brain diseases such as cerebral trauma, intracranial tumor (except small meningioma), cerebral aneurysm, etc.
2. Evidence of acute ischemic infarction in bilateral anterior circulation territory or involvement of posterior circulation territories (other than in patients with a fetal or near-fetal PCA configuration);
3. Vascular perforation during thrombectomy;
4. The pre-randomization CT findings exhibits evidence of parenchymal hemorrhage 2 intracranial hemorrhage, diffuse severe subarachnoid hemorrhage, or intraventricular hemorrhage. Patients with localized mild subarachnoid hemorrhage, hemorrhagic infarction type1 or 2, and small parenchymal hematoma type 1 without midline shift may be included;
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University.
Beijing, , China
Liaocheng Brain Hospital
Shandong, , China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IAT-EPIC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.