Carotid Artery Stenting During Endovascular Treatment of Acute Stroke
NCT ID: NCT06511089
Last Updated: 2024-07-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE3
600 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-11-15
2026-11-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objective: to assess the safety and efficacy of immediate cervical CAS during EVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to LVO with a high-grade stenosis \>50% or occlusion of the ipsilateral cervical carotid artery.
Study design: prospective randomized open label controlled trial comparing immediate CAS during EVT versus EVT with deferred treatment of the cervical carotid artery lesion (deferred CAS/CEA or medical management alone). Outcome assessment will be blinded for treatment allocation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Permanent Intracranial Stenting for Acute Ischemic Stroke Related to a Refractory Large Vessel Occlusion
NCT06071091
Endovascular Acute Stroke Intervention - Tandem OCclusion Trial
NCT04261478
Endarterectomy Versus Stenting in Patients With Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis - 2
NCT07054060
Endovascular Treatment and RIPC in Acute Ischemic Stroke
NCT04581759
Treatment With Endovascular Intervention for STroke Patients With Existing Disability
NCT05911568
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Who can participate? Patients with acute ischemic stroke with a CT-angiography-proven intracranial LVO in the anterior circulation (ICA, A1, M1 or M2) as well as an ipsilateral cervical carotid artery tandem lesion of presumed atherosclerotic origin with a stenosis \>50% or an ipsilateral acute proximal internal carotid artery occlusion who are treated with EVT according to the guidelines.
What does the study involve? Patients will be randomly allocated to receive either a carotid artery stent immediately after suffering a stroke, or to treatment as usual.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating? Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: All patients are being treated with EVT according to the local guidelines. The patients allocated to the intervention group will undergo CAS during EVT, which carries a risk of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome and subsequent intracerebral hemorrhage. The potential benefits of immediate CAS during thrombectomy include: an improvement of cerebral blood flow during and after EVT. A second benefit is a lower risk of recurrent stroke in the first 14 days compared to the deferred treatment strategy. A third benefit of immediate CAS is that the patient does not need a second invasive treatment (carotid revascularization surgery (CEA or CAS) during the rehabilitation period which again carries some risk of complications. At last, the immediate CAS approach is likely to reduce health care costs.
Where is the study run from? The study will be coordinated by the University Medical Center Groningen in the Netherlands and by the University Hospital Leuven in Belgium. 26 centres (9 in Belgium and 17 in the Netherlands) will participate.
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for? November 2022 to November 2026
Who is funding the study? The study is part of the COllaboration of New TReatments of Acute STroke (CONTRAST) consortium (www.contrast-consortium.nl).
The study is funded by the BeNeFIT funding members (ZonMw/KCE) (the Netherlands)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Carotid artery stenting during endovascular thrombectomy
In the intervention group, the cervical carotid artery lesion will be treated with a stent during the EVT (just before or directly after intracranial thrombus removal)
carotid artery stenting during EVT
Patients with an ipsilateral high grade carotid artery stenosis or occlusion of presumed atherosclerotic origin and an proximal intracranial large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation will be randomized using a web-based randomization tool to immediate carotid artery stenting or deferred treatment strategy of carotid artery stenosis.
In the intervention group, the cervical carotid artery lesion will be treated with a stent during the EVT (just before or directly after intracranial thrombus removal), the control group will be treated according to the national guidelines with carotid endarterectomy of carotid artery stenting (for patients with non-disabling stroke) or medical management alone (for patients with severe disabling stroke).
No immediate carotid artery stenting during endovascular thrombectomy
The control group will be treated according to the national guidelines with carotid endarterectomy of carotid artery stenting (for patients with non-disabling stroke) or medical management alone (for patients with severe disabling stroke)
no carotid artery stenting during EVT
A deferred treatment approach: carotid revascularization within two weeks after stroke onset or best medical management only, depending on the functional recovery of the patient.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
carotid artery stenting during EVT
Patients with an ipsilateral high grade carotid artery stenosis or occlusion of presumed atherosclerotic origin and an proximal intracranial large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation will be randomized using a web-based randomization tool to immediate carotid artery stenting or deferred treatment strategy of carotid artery stenosis.
In the intervention group, the cervical carotid artery lesion will be treated with a stent during the EVT (just before or directly after intracranial thrombus removal), the control group will be treated according to the national guidelines with carotid endarterectomy of carotid artery stenting (for patients with non-disabling stroke) or medical management alone (for patients with severe disabling stroke).
no carotid artery stenting during EVT
A deferred treatment approach: carotid revascularization within two weeks after stroke onset or best medical management only, depending on the functional recovery of the patient.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Stenosis \>50% according to the NASCET criteria16 or initial occlusion of the ipsilateral cervical carotid artery of presumed atherosclerotic origin on baseline CT angiography
3. Eligible for EVT according to the guidelines: EVT within 6 hours of onset or EVT between 6-24 hours after onset based on perfusion CT imaging selection (conform current guidelines)
4. Baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≥2
5. Age \>18 years
6. Written informed consent (deferred consent)
Exclusion Criteria
2. Cervical carotid artery stenosis or occlusion with other causes than presumed atherosclerosis (e.g. carotid artery dissection, floating thrombus, carotid web)
3. Any exclusion criterion for EVT according to the guidelines
4. Pre stroke disability (defined as a modified Rankin Scale score \>2)
5. Recent gastro-intestinal or urinary tract hemorrhage (\<6 weeks)
6. Recent severe head trauma (\<6 weeks)
7. Recent infarction on baseline brain CT in the same vascular territory (\<6 weeks)
8. Known allergy to aspirin and/or clopidogrel
9. Pregnancy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
OTHER
University Medical Center Groningen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Maarten Uyttenboogaart, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Medical Center Groningen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Maes L, Van Elk T, van der Meij A, Roelofs F, Bogaerts K, Bokkers RP, de Borst GJ, den Hertog HM, Dippel DW, Francois O, Ligot N, Lingsma HF, Majoie CB, Peluso JP, Tancredi I, van den Wijngaard IR, van der Lugt A, Yperzeele L, Zeebregts CJ, Nederkoorn PJ, Lemmens R, Uyttenboogaart M. Carotid Artery Stenting during Endovascular treatment of acute ischemic Stroke (CASES) study protocol for a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Eur Stroke J. 2025 Sep;10(3):995-1002. doi: 10.1177/23969873251319941. Epub 2025 Feb 16.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
trial website
Contrast Consortium
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL79046.078.23
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.