Comparing Carotid Stenting With Endarterectomy in Severe Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis
NCT ID: NCT00772278
Last Updated: 2017-07-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
137 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-01-31
2015-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Primary:
• Comparison of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity which includes cardiac and neurological morbidity (TIA and CVA) in the two invasive treatments of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis
Secondary:
* Comparison of non cardiovascular morbidity caused by the two invasive techniques
1. morbidity at the site of incision (infection or local hematoma)
2. damage to cranial nerves (hypoglossus, vagus)
3. brain hyperperfusion which is defined as severe headache which is not responsive to analgesics with or without nausea and vomiting.
4. events of bradycardia within the first 24 hours, clinically evident and/or silent
* microembolic brain events immediately after the procedure and their relationship with morbidity and/or mortality due to TIA's or CVA's
* the change in the stenotic carotid artery at the time of follow up with duplex of neck arteries
* the comparison of the affect of the two procedures on patient life style
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Carotid Artery Stenting During Endovascular Treatment of Acute Stroke
NCT06511089
Endarterectomy Versus Stenting in Patients With Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis - 2
NCT07054060
Endarterectomy vs Stenting in Chinese Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Patients
NCT03737175
Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in Brazil
NCT02538276
" Endarterectomy Combined With Optimal Medical Therapy (OMT) vs OMT Alone in Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Atherosclerotic Carotid Artery Stenosis at Higher-than-average Risk of Ipsilateral Stroke "
NCT02841098
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Recently endovascular technique involving stent placement has been introduced to treat carotid artery stenosis. Early studies found this technique to be equal to traditional carotid endarterectomy in mortality and morbidity (8). Complications associated with endovascular stenting: 1-3% of patients develop a TIA or a CVA, bleeding at artery access site is at the rate of 1%, cardiac complications depending on individual risk factors (0.5%), 1-4% of patients suffer from a periprocedural arterial thromboembolic events, finally, 1% of patients suffer from renal function deterioration. Invasive treatment of carotid artery stenosis, traditional or endovascular, may be accompanied by microembolic events, which, do not necessarily result in cerebral ischemia with evident neurological deficiency. These events, however, may be noted on brain CT and may result in cognitive decline (2-4%). The role of stent deposition in conjunction with a vascular protective device, in protecting from microembolic events is still unclear.
In this study, price-rapid exchange® (Cordis, FL, USA) will be evaluated in the treatment of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Traditional indications for stent placement will be used: stenosis of 70% or more demonstrated by carotid artery duplex, CTA or MRA. The stent is placed into the area of stenosed carotid artery using percutaneous approach in the operating room. The artery is visualized by injecting contrast material, a vascular protective device, angioguard® (Cordis, FL, USA), is placed downstream from carotid artery stenosis, the stent is inserted and expanded by a balloon, amiia® (Cordis, FL, USA). Furthermore, a completion angiography is preformed to visualize the final stent location and the protective vascular device is removed. A regiment of 100mg Aspirin, once daily, is initiated before endovascular treatment, and then continued as a part of a permanent treatment. Five thousand units of intravenous heparin are given at the beginning of the endovascular procedure. Heparin is than continued at 500 units per hour for the next 12 hours. The patient is discharged one day after the procedure.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CAS
carotid artery stenting
carotid artery stenting
carotid artery angiography, angioplasty and stenting
CEA
carotid endarterectomy
carotid endarterectomy
open surgery including endarterectomy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
carotid artery stenting
carotid artery angiography, angioplasty and stenting
carotid endarterectomy
open surgery including endarterectomy
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* No evidence of TIA or CVA originating in area of the brain supplied by the carotid artery under study, in the four months preceding treatment.
* Eligibility for both treatment options:
1. suited for operative treatment as assessed by an anesthesiologist
2. suited for endovascular procedure by established radiological guidelines (including: access to the stenotic area via the vessels of the aortic arch, the absence of occlusion preventing this access, absence of significant atherosclerosis within the arch of aorta, absence of torturous anatomy of the common and internal carotid artery, and absence of thrombus in the area of stenosis)
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Carmel Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dallit Manheim
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dallit Mannheim, Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Carmel Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Carmel Medical Center
Haifa, , Israel
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
cas vs cea-001-carmel
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CMC-07-0094-CTIL
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.